|
|
Post by Elizabeth on May 22, 2018 8:08:22 GMT
Ok so this is kind of biology too as well as race. But race has less threads so it'll go here  . Ok so trying to remember my biology lesson on this...so the way different skin colors were made and all these variations depend on how much exposure you get to the sun and so on. For example, like it's hot near the equator so people tend to be darker skinned there. And in countries way up north where it's colder, the people tend to be lighter skinned. And when people live in groups/countries they reproduce and attain features unique to them. Like the Galapagos islands separated so much from the rest of the animals that they are protected now because of how unique they are. So my question is will humans gain more variations and looks? Or shrink in variaition? As in things like the dwarf and gigantium could genes die off completely and people will look more alike? Lighter or darker might not change probably unless the sun pulls something I'm guessing |
|
|
|
Post by Lone Wanderer on May 22, 2018 8:23:04 GMT
Isolation and environment and adaptation of it creates races, sub-species, species and etc. How in this modern world and with the rise of globalism, a group of humans can isolate themselves for XXXXX years? On the other hand: New Species Can Develop in Two GenerationsAlso mutations could introduce new humans or even new humanoid or human-like species. |
|
|
|
Post by Elizabeth on May 22, 2018 8:27:18 GMT
Isolation and environment and adaptation of it creates races, sub-species, species and etc. How in this modern world and with the rise of globalism, a group of humans can isolate themselves for XXXXX years? On the other hand: New Species Can Develop in Two GenerationsAlso mutations could introduce new humans or even new humanoid or human-like species. You know...with how things are going and with interracial marriages increasing...we might one day look very similar! This could help end racism  |
|
|
|
Post by Lone Wanderer on May 22, 2018 8:36:58 GMT
Isolation and environment and adaptation of it creates races, sub-species, species and etc. How in this modern world and with the rise of globalism, a group of humans can isolate themselves for XXXXX years? On the other hand: New Species Can Develop in Two GenerationsAlso mutations could introduce new humans or even new humanoid or human-like species. You know...with how things are going and with interracial marriages increasing...we might one day look very similar! This could help end racism Yeah, some scientists predicted it: Most future humans would be brown-skinned with low diversity in their phenotypes. Google it. In my opinion, South America and its people could be a good example of future. I don't think the major races will disappear but the extinction of some specific groups is possible, e.g. Andamanese |
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
Post by Deleted on May 22, 2018 9:25:14 GMT
You know...with how things are going and with interracial marriages increasing...we might one day look very similar! This could help end racism Google it. In my opinion, South America and its people could be a good example of future. I don't think the major races will disappear but the extinction of some specific groups is possible, e.g. AndamaneseDoesn't it mean if diversity is small the risk for genetically inherited illness rises? |
|
|
|
Post by Elizabeth on May 22, 2018 9:39:20 GMT
Yeah, some scientists predicted it: Most future humans would be brown-skinned with low diversity in their phenotypes. Google it. In my opinion, South America and its people could be a good example of future. I don't think the major races will disappear but the extinction of some specific groups is possible, e.g. Andamanese Doesn't it mean if diversity is small the risk for genetically inherited illness rises? How so? Wouldn't it just be like 2 people of the same race having babies? |
|
|
|
Post by Lone Wanderer on May 22, 2018 9:49:12 GMT
Yeah, some scientists predicted it: Most future humans would be brown-skinned with low diversity in their phenotypes. Google it. In my opinion, South America and its people could be a good example of future. I don't think the major races will disappear but the extinction of some specific groups is possible, e.g. Andamanese Doesn't it mean if diversity is small the risk for genetically inherited illness rises? Genetically they would be diverse. I talked about similarities in skin color and phenotypes. For instance, two persons have visible Black African traits and their skin color and facial features look similar. But genetically one in more European shifted and the other is more SSA shifted. So they are diverse in their genetic admixture. |
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
Post by Deleted on May 22, 2018 10:00:51 GMT
Doesn't it mean if diversity is small the risk for genetically inherited illness rises? How so? Wouldn't it just be like 2 people of the same race having babies? I remember the case of European Wisent in Altai region. Scientists were afraid because of lack of genetic diversity. |
|
|
|
Post by Lone Wanderer on May 22, 2018 10:08:01 GMT
The future is mixed-race and that’s a good thing for humanityAnd so is the past. Migration and mingling are essential to human success in the past, the present and into the future QuoteIf the history of life on Earth can teach us anything, it is this: as conditions change, species either adapt or become extinct. In our time of considerable environmental change, humanity should consider its options. No species, even the almighty Homo sapiens, can stop evolution completely. But we can choose to limit our capacity for ongoing biological adaptation in an effort to remain ever the same by keeping populations isolated. Of course, such decisions are not made by humanity as a whole but by individuals and governments. Nationalism and xenophobia, on the rise in the US and Europe, threaten to decrease genetic exchange between populations, stifling our ability to continue evolving and adapting. Alternatively, we can embrace immigration and globalisation in an effort to position ourselves for a brighter future. The underlying causes of the current high rates of human migration are likely to persist, and perhaps to increase, as the global human population continues to grow. Access to natural resources such as fresh water have long driven population movements, and these might become even more important drivers of migration as the world’s population expands. Likewise, as economic development proceeds, the amount of resources used by each person will continue to rise, putting further pressure on scarce resources and further motivating people to move in search of better conditions. Sea levels are expected to continue rising as a result of global climate change, and this is likely to drive large-scale population movements away from low-lying coastal areas as they become uninhabitable. In short, the reshuffling of populations that results from the movement of people around the world will continue to shape the structure of our gene pool – and, by extension, our future evolution – for many generations to come.
|
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
Post by Deleted on May 22, 2018 10:15:02 GMT
The future is mixed-race and that’s a good thing for humanityAnd so is the past. Migration and mingling are essential to human success in the past, the present and into the future QuoteIf the history of life on Earth can teach us anything, it is this: as conditions change, species either adapt or become extinct. In our time of considerable environmental change, humanity should consider its options. No species, even the almighty Homo sapiens, can stop evolution completely. But we can choose to limit our capacity for ongoing biological adaptation in an effort to remain ever the same by keeping populations isolated. Of course, such decisions are not made by humanity as a whole but by individuals and governments. Nationalism and xenophobia, on the rise in the US and Europe, threaten to decrease genetic exchange between populations, stifling our ability to continue evolving and adapting. Alternatively, we can embrace immigration and globalisation in an effort to position ourselves for a brighter future. The underlying causes of the current high rates of human migration are likely to persist, and perhaps to increase, as the global human population continues to grow. Access to natural resources such as fresh water have long driven population movements, and these might become even more important drivers of migration as the world’s population expands. Likewise, as economic development proceeds, the amount of resources used by each person will continue to rise, putting further pressure on scarce resources and further motivating people to move in search of better conditions. Sea levels are expected to continue rising as a result of global climate change, and this is likely to drive large-scale population movements away from low-lying coastal areas as they become uninhabitable. In short, the reshuffling of populations that results from the movement of people around the world will continue to shape the structure of our gene pool – and, by extension, our future evolution – for many generations to come. I think the altruism of Europeans will destroy Europeans if they accept and intermingle with foreigners, especially if they come from undeveloped areas. |
|
|
|
Post by Διαμονδ on May 22, 2018 12:23:10 GMT
Everything should stay in place!
|
|
|
|
Post by DKTrav88 on May 22, 2018 13:55:58 GMT
I think the amount variations will stay the same, but the kinds of variations will change over time. Though this mostly depends on the human population too.
As far as racism goes, I don’t think it will ever go away because people are so superficial. But I agree that skin color will mostly depend on where you live. If you’re out in the sun a lot, your skin will be darker. If you live in a place where the sun doesn’t shine much, your skin will be lighter.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lone Wanderer on May 22, 2018 15:18:38 GMT
The future is mixed-race and that’s a good thing for humanityAnd so is the past. Migration and mingling are essential to human success in the past, the present and into the future QuoteIf the history of life on Earth can teach us anything, it is this: as conditions change, species either adapt or become extinct. In our time of considerable environmental change, humanity should consider its options. No species, even the almighty Homo sapiens, can stop evolution completely. But we can choose to limit our capacity for ongoing biological adaptation in an effort to remain ever the same by keeping populations isolated. Of course, such decisions are not made by humanity as a whole but by individuals and governments. Nationalism and xenophobia, on the rise in the US and Europe, threaten to decrease genetic exchange between populations, stifling our ability to continue evolving and adapting. Alternatively, we can embrace immigration and globalisation in an effort to position ourselves for a brighter future. The underlying causes of the current high rates of human migration are likely to persist, and perhaps to increase, as the global human population continues to grow. Access to natural resources such as fresh water have long driven population movements, and these might become even more important drivers of migration as the world’s population expands. Likewise, as economic development proceeds, the amount of resources used by each person will continue to rise, putting further pressure on scarce resources and further motivating people to move in search of better conditions. Sea levels are expected to continue rising as a result of global climate change, and this is likely to drive large-scale population movements away from low-lying coastal areas as they become uninhabitable. In short, the reshuffling of populations that results from the movement of people around the world will continue to shape the structure of our gene pool – and, by extension, our future evolution – for many generations to come. I think the altruism of Europeans will destroy Europeans if they accept and intermingle with foreigners, especially if they come from undeveloped areas. Mass immigration + weak integration/assimilation system destroy any society not only European ones. Some European countries accept worst kind of immigrants and most of those immigrants/refugees are males who are actually invaders not refugees. Mass immigration, low birth rate of natives, and no integration. So it's not difficult to predict the future and fate of those countries. Race mixing is not problematic if it's not caused by racial fetishism, brain washing, or agenda. Two humans love each other and they think interracial marriage/relationship works for themselves. Good for them if they could manage it and have a happy life and normal family. I don't see any wrong things in a good and successful interracial relationship. |
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
Post by Deleted on May 22, 2018 15:49:44 GMT
I think the altruism of Europeans will destroy Europeans if they accept and intermingle with foreigners, especially if they come from undeveloped areas. Mass immigration + weak integration/assimilation system destroy any society not only European ones. Some European countries accept worst kind of immigrants and most of those immigrants/refugees are males who are actually invaders not refugees. Mass immigration, low birth rate of natives, and no integration. So it's not difficult to predict the future and fate of those countries. I guess you talk about Germany, Austria, France, UK and few others. That is actually true, but they have old, dying population and someone decided they need young manpower to sustain their collapsing economies by all cost. Race mixing is problematic because its destroying the nation. That creates general nonacceptance for mixed individuals among the other non-mixed, native individuals of the same country. Many would argue by saying how USA is counter-example, but USA has interracial problems among itself. Europe still doesn't have to such an extent, but in a couple of years the aforementioned countries will fall in similar problems, in fact the process already started by fighting ISIS in Belgium, France and UK. Now even greater problem is such behavior of mistrust among the native population can only be stopped by massive propaganda and repression. |
|
|
|
Post by joustos on May 22, 2018 17:07:40 GMT
The future is mixed-race and that’s a good thing for humanityAnd so is the past. Migration and mingling are essential to human success in the past, the present and into the future QuoteIf the history of life on Earth can teach us anything, it is this: as conditions change, species either adapt or become extinct. In our time of considerable environmental change, humanity should consider its options. No species, even the almighty Homo sapiens, can stop evolution completely. But we can choose to limit our capacity for ongoing biological adaptation in an effort to remain ever the same by keeping populations isolated. Of course, such decisions are not made by humanity as a whole but by individuals and governments. Nationalism and xenophobia, on the rise in the US and Europe, threaten to decrease genetic exchange between populations, stifling our ability to continue evolving and adapting. Alternatively, we can embrace immigration and globalisation in an effort to position ourselves for a brighter future. The underlying causes of the current high rates of human migration are likely to persist, and perhaps to increase, as the global human population continues to grow. Access to natural resources such as fresh water have long driven population movements, and these might become even more important drivers of migration as the world’s population expands. Likewise, as economic development proceeds, the amount of resources used by each person will continue to rise, putting further pressure on scarce resources and further motivating people to move in search of better conditions. Sea levels are expected to continue rising as a result of global climate change, and this is likely to drive large-scale population movements away from low-lying coastal areas as they become uninhabitable. In short, the reshuffling of populations that results from the movement of people around the world will continue to shape the structure of our gene pool – and, by extension, our future evolution – for many generations to come. I think the altruism of Europeans will destroy Europeans if they accept and intermingle with foreigners, especially if they come fr.om undeveloped areas. I agree. The biological "destruction" of Europe is already underway, as it is evident especially in Greece and in Italy, but the reason for the foreigners' ill effects is not exactly either the colour of their skin, or the underdevelopment of the areas where they come from. Many of them belong to the cerebral race of primitives, akin to Neanderthals rather than Cro-magnons. The admixture of somatic races necessarily involves an admixture of cerebral races, and, in the course of time, the "Neanderthals" will be the majority of the European population. The environmental physical conditions of the Western world does not change either their colour or their brains -- at least for millennia, by which time there will not be a civilized West left.
|
|
. Ok so trying to remember my biology lesson on this...so the way different skin colors were made and all these variations depend on how much exposure you get to the sun and so on. For example, like it's hot near the equator so people tend to be darker skinned there. And in countries way up north where it's colder, the people tend to be lighter skinned. And when people live in groups/countries they reproduce and attain features unique to them. Like the Galapagos islands separated so much from the rest of the animals that they are protected now because of how unique they are. So my question is will humans gain more variations and looks? Or shrink in variaition? As in things like the dwarf and gigantium could genes die off completely and people will look more alike? Lighter or darker might not change probably unless the sun pulls something I'm guessing 
