|
Post by DKTrav88 on Feb 21, 2018 17:04:22 GMT
What are some false doctrines that are popular among Christians today?
|
|
|
Post by Elizabeth on Apr 4, 2018 9:22:51 GMT
unknown Yeah I only clicked on it for a few seconds and heard Russian so assumed it was all in Russian xD
|
|
|
Post by DKTrav88 on Apr 4, 2018 9:38:33 GMT
Elizabeth The video in two translations. You can listen to it to, Bradshaw is almost the one of the modern analytic philosophers of religion which claiming the more neutral/accurate position. The video maybe is not short, but it's worth to watch/listen to. DKTrav88 Excuse me, but who has taught you your language? The Bible is for itself just from itself (aka 'sola fide' of Luter) is unappropriate even for Protestants, because it's obvious that the Bible has been written in Aramean, not in English. So, counting on your own in this case seems to be nothing but strange. I'd say that there's a dangerous hiding in someone's interpretation, but everyone the same here, anyone can be without mistakes. - Bradshaw is interpreting it within the Bible. I don't understand that escaping of Protestant form teaching of Fathers. Even understanding more progressive and rational role of Protestantism this case still seems to me just something absolutely nonsense. There is not any reason to struggle from them. Almost every philosophers today would say that our consciousness is based intersubjectively, that means that even being alone, just with yourself, you are still surrounded by imagine persons. We cannot avoid being with other 'persons' in our mind. It can be explained just because of the nature of consciousness that tied up with language which, in turn, is divided in three parts: name (or symbol), meaning and sense. All these three parts are necessary for everyone who sane, and even for insane; i.e. for all human is necessary to have consciousness that in turn has these three parts, that in turn means that we're 'not alone'. Therefore, it has no reason to struggle from interpretation of Fathers, or someone else. I'd say that 'to listen to' doesn't imply 'to accept it'. So, I thought it wouldn't be useless to watch the video. Διαμονδ - You're absolutely right. None tries to carry out another Church member into another, it's just a conversation, pretty reasoning about that. The main topics about 'why Fathers saw no problem in "the problem of free will"'? And Bradshaw says us that Fathers... (I have left some gaps here, because I'm non going to retell it now) says that God doing in accordance with the good will of any human. That's why we can't say that God has concern to bad things doing of men. Hmmm well put your faith in Bradshaw then, choice is yours.
|
|
|
Post by Διαμονδ on Apr 4, 2018 9:45:39 GMT
Hmmm well put your faith in Bradshaw then, choice is yours. Bradshaw quotes only the Bible information and information that does not contradict the Bible! I carefully studied the subject!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 4, 2018 9:47:36 GMT
Elizabeth The video in two translations. You can listen to it to, Bradshaw is almost the one of the modern analytic philosophers of religion which claiming the more neutral/accurate position. The video maybe is not short, but it's worth to watch/listen to. DKTrav88 Excuse me, but who has taught you your language? The Bible is for itself just from itself (aka 'sola fide' of Luter) is unappropriate even for Protestants, because it's obvious that the Bible has been written in Aramean, not in English. So, counting on your own in this case seems to be nothing but strange. I'd say that there's a dangerous hiding in someone's interpretation, but everyone the same here, anyone can be without mistakes. - Bradshaw is interpreting it within the Bible. I don't understand that escaping of Protestant form teaching of Fathers. Even understanding more progressive and rational role of Protestantism this case still seems to me just something absolutely nonsense. There is not any reason to struggle from them. Almost every philosophers today would say that our consciousness is based intersubjectively, that means that even being alone, just with yourself, you are still surrounded by imagine persons. We cannot avoid being with other 'persons' in our mind. It can be explained just because of the nature of consciousness that tied up with language which, in turn, is divided in three parts: name (or symbol), meaning and sense. All these three parts are necessary for everyone who sane, and even for insane; i.e. for all human is necessary to have consciousness that in turn has these three parts, that in turn means that we're 'not alone'. Therefore, it has no reason to struggle from interpretation of Fathers, or someone else. I'd say that 'to listen to' doesn't imply 'to accept it'. So, I thought it wouldn't be useless to watch the video. Διαμονδ - You're absolutely right. None tries to carry out another Church member into another, it's just a conversation, pretty reasoning about that. The main topics about 'why Fathers saw no problem in "the problem of free will"'? And Bradshaw says us that Fathers... (I have left some gaps here, because I'm non going to retell it now) says that God doing in accordance with the good will of any human. That's why we can't say that God has concern to bad things doing of men. Hmmm well put your faith in Bradshaw then, choice is yours. Why to? I'm interested in honestly, not in authorities.
|
|
|
Post by DKTrav88 on Apr 4, 2018 9:53:11 GMT
Hmmm well put your faith in Bradshaw then, choice is yours. Why to? I'm interested in honestly, not in authorities. God cannot lie, hence He is honest. And God is the ultimate authority
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 4, 2018 9:55:33 GMT
To me the most funny situation is when the Christians decide who is right and who is wrong, bashing everybody around, because they possesed the truth that nobody knows. Oh dear... It's really funny to see that modern Sanhedrin wears the crosses on the chest. If you talk about Jesuits, I understand you! I wasn't talking about Jesuits.
|
|
|
Post by Διαμονδ on Apr 4, 2018 10:00:13 GMT
Why to? I'm interested in honestly, not in authorities. God cannot lie, hence He is honest. And God is the ultimate authority God has spoken to his church from the time of the apostles through his Spirit! This is the essence of Christianity - the anointings from the Spirit of God that the church has always had holy people because God is always with believers! If God can not lie to his people, then why don't you believe them?
|
|
|
Post by DKTrav88 on Apr 4, 2018 10:01:55 GMT
God cannot lie, hence He is honest. And God is the ultimate authority God has spoken to his church from the time of the apostles through his Spirit! This is the essence of Christianity - the anointings from the Spirit of God that the church has always had holy people because God is always with believers! If God can not lie to his people, then why don't you believe them? Because God said all men are liars.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 4, 2018 10:03:12 GMT
Why to? I'm interested in honestly, not in authorities. God cannot lie, hence He is honest. And God is the ultimate authority Without doubt, if there's a God, He shall be. But: 1) I doubt at an existence of Him (I understand it well, that in any cases and ways, it doesn't imply that there's no God); 2) Only what I'd heard about Him were someone's interpretations; i.e. prophecy, and reading of the scriptures. 3) The scriptures could be as having been interpreted as having been corrected by someone. These three reasons allow me to have some doubts about the existence of God, not denying His existence completely.
|
|
|
Post by DKTrav88 on Apr 4, 2018 10:04:58 GMT
God cannot lie, hence He is honest. And God is the ultimate authority Without doubt, if there's a God, He shall be. But: 1) I doubt at an existence of Him (I understand it well, that in any cases and ways, it doesn't imply that there's no God); 2) Only what I'd heard about Him were someone's interpretations; i.e. prophecy, and reading of the scriptures. 3) The scriptures could be as having been interpreted as having been corrected by someone. These three reasons allow me to have some doubts about the existence of God, not denying His existence completely. I can’t change what you believe
|
|
|
Post by Διαμονδ on Apr 4, 2018 10:13:23 GMT
God has spoken to his church from the time of the apostles through his Spirit! This is the essence of Christianity - the anointings from the Spirit of God that the church has always had holy people because God is always with believers! If God can not lie to his people, then why don't you believe them? Because God said all men are liars. Why then are the authors of the Gospel not liars ?? For atheists and non-Christians, they are also liars!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 4, 2018 10:16:14 GMT
Without doubt, if there's a God, He shall be. But: 1) I doubt at an existence of Him (I understand it well, that in any cases and ways, it doesn't imply that there's no God); 2) Only what I'd heard about Him were someone's interpretations; i.e. prophecy, and reading of the scriptures. 3) The scriptures could be as having been interpreted as having been corrected by someone. These three reasons allow me to have some doubts about the existence of God, not denying His existence completely. I can’t change what you believe And it isn't necessary. I think you're a good guy, why to say me more that it shall be said? I mean, I look at this situation - the discussion of ours - as the fact that you have wanted to say me good about God, to say that God is not just a toy, a mirage, etc. So, I think that it's not necessary to reckon situations in which no followers of God have been appeared as the situation with turning into believing in God. I'd say that you have been honestly and courage, so I can count it just like brief knight duel Anyway, I stepped closely to changing myself - to God or from God, but I'd already chose the side. I with you the best!
|
|
|
Post by DKTrav88 on Apr 4, 2018 10:16:38 GMT
Because God said all men are liars. Why then are the authors of the Gospel not liars ?? For atheists and non-Christians, they are also liars! 😊 Because God isn’t a liar, God promised to preserve His word forever
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 4, 2018 10:17:39 GMT
Because God said all men are liars. Why then are the authors of the Gospel not liars ?? For atheists and non-Christians, they are also liars! Well, not exactly, they are not liars. I just put in here, that there's a measuring of the lie; the lie have some degrees.
|
|
|
Post by Διαμονδ on Apr 4, 2018 10:22:17 GMT
Why then are the authors of the Gospel not liars ?? For atheists and non-Christians, they are also liars! 😊 Because God isn’t a liar, God promised to preserve His word forever Yes! But was all his Word written on paper? The Bible itself says that no ..
|
|