|
Post by Lone Wanderer on Feb 5, 2018 12:25:16 GMT
Neuroscientific techniques continue to advance, but their applications in law raise concerns of a threat to individual rights. Previous applications of neuroscientific evidence include using brain scans to detect deception in an individual, and neurological responses to determine whether someone has intimate knowledge of a crime. However, just because we can use this technology, does it mean we should? "Brain science is being viewed for its potential to be used in legal cases," explains Prof. James Giordano, who co-wrote the paper. "It can certainly afford information relevant to an individual's capability, but there have also been attempts to employ neuroscientific methods to gain insight -- and to inform juries and judges -- about persons' intent and possible guilt." Source and full article: Can your brain testify against you?
|
|
|
Post by Elizabeth on Feb 6, 2018 1:04:33 GMT
I heard that it isn't always fully accurate since I watch shows that use it. But I always wanted to try the lie detector test or a truth serum that they have. I think would be fun but no it's not a good source to use to see if you're guilty of a crime.
|
|