|
Post by Διαμονδ on Jan 8, 2018 15:31:50 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Διαμονδ on Jan 8, 2018 15:32:32 GMT
What is your opinion about this?
|
|
|
Post by Mortimer on Jan 9, 2018 3:19:55 GMT
Is this a new thread? I said my opinion already in a other thread, interracial marriage is the same for me as mono racial marriage. I dont see any difference.
|
|
|
Post by AmericanCharm on Jan 9, 2018 4:31:36 GMT
If you look at the way society (In America anyway, Europe as well just not the same time table) has changed in the last 50 years it is actually nuts. Races were segregated 50 years ago and now it is perfectly acceptable for the races to inter-marry and breed with each other so much so that you can get in trouble for speaking out against it. That is a drastic change in such a short space of time. In my opinion it is natural for a group to want to remain this way because outsiders are perceived as dangerous or threatening. One could argue humans by nature are xenophobic because, mongrelizing with other races violates the law of self-preservation. Self preservation is 100% normal and says no to anything that threatens my life, my people, my religion or lack off, my culture, my history. And this principle applies to all races/ethnicities.
All these tribal instincts have been broken down gradually over the past 50 years so much so that the views your Grandparents and almost everyone before them had are now "wrong", "racist", "archaic", etc The new age of sexualized Americans and Europeans think they are the enlightened ones and that there is nothing wrong with turning thousands upon thousands of years of beliefs upside down within half a century. Something is with modern society. Every natural instinct is now perceived as wrong...
Its completely probable humans developed an evolutionary rejection to homosexuality, race-mixing and "feminism" as a means of survival. Keeping within your tribe, keeping your women home safe to bear kids and men not being gay = more offspring and securing the survival of your kind. The number one thing that has turned the whole thing upside down is TV/Media. Nothing can survive let alone thrive on perverting the laws of nature.
|
|
|
Post by Elizabeth on Jan 9, 2018 6:47:01 GMT
Oh, if it's male and female then I won't care. It's their choice to have a family that's, well, different. I just like mine the same.
|
|
|
Post by Mortimer on Jan 9, 2018 6:48:19 GMT
Oh, if it's male and female then I won't care. It's their choice to have a family that's, well, different. I just like mine the same. I agree. Im against gay marriage but not against interracial marriage.
|
|
|
Post by Elizabeth on Jan 9, 2018 7:25:01 GMT
Oh, if it's male and female then I won't care. It's their choice to have a family that's, well, different. I just like mine the same. I agree. Im against gay marriage but not against interracial marriage. Yeah, nature lets them reproduce unlike gay marriages do it's whatever really. Nature law allows it. We're all from Adam and Eve after all.
|
|
|
Post by Διαμονδ on Jan 9, 2018 8:46:44 GMT
This is absolutely unacceptable among many peoples! Especially in my country! Who wants his child to be the subject of ridicule at school and so on?????? This is bad for many signs!
|
|
amenemhab
Junior Member
Posts: 66
Likes: 45
Ethnicity: American
Country: USA
Region: Mountain States
Ancestry: English, Irish, German, others
Politics: Democrat
Religion: Christian
Age: 54
|
Post by amenemhab on Jan 10, 2018 10:00:38 GMT
What is your opinion about this? This is absolutely unacceptable among many peoples! Especially in my country! Who wants his child to be the subject of ridicule at school and so on? Morally acceptable, even desirable from a standpoint of creating alliances between the world’s peoples and tribes in our efforts to unite and create a planetary civilization. Yet interracial marriage isn’t totally problem-free. We have biracial kids who have trouble gaining acceptance from fellow schoolchildren of either of the parental races—particularly kids who have one black parent, as many blacks, due to their minority status in the USA, or colonial legacies in Africa, still keep an interest in preserving their racial identity.
I think the problems, already diminishing in the Western countries, won’t hinder progress. Yet with my neighbor kids engaged in bully talk, I suspect interracial kids can have a hard time growing up if they don’t live in a racially tolerant urban area. Those choosing marriage with children outside their own race may need to move to find more accommodating neighbors and schools. It’s completely probable humans developed an evolutionary rejection to homosexuality [and] race-mixing…as a means of survival. Keeping within your tribe, keeping your women home safe to bear kids…securing the survival of your kind. The number one thing that has turned the whole thing upside down is TV/Media. Nothing can survive let alone thrive on perverting the laws of nature. No doubt we’ve evolved such natalist, ingroup-outgroup instincts from hundreds of millennia in which we lived in small bands which had to patrol their borders to protect them from foreigners competing for resources, and screw like bunny rabbits to keep ahead of high infant mortality and killer infectious diseases.
These instincts, however, serve us less and less well in a world of computers, global economics and nuclear weapons. If we can’t moderate those urges, we may lose our modern world and go back to the way things were 600 years ago, when most people faced a life of backbreaking labor on farms amid round after round of measles, smallpox, tuberculosis, and cholera. I’m against gay marriage but not against interracial marriage. And why is one correct but the other wrong? If you really want to be a conservative, better to oppose both! Yet both are becoming reality as the generations turn. I’m getting old. I retain a few old-school thought patterns I grew up with. But I realize society is changing—and I’m not here to stop it. My peers and I rebelled, too.
|
|
|
Post by Mortimer on Jan 10, 2018 12:23:43 GMT
I’m against gay marriage but not against interracial marriage. And why is one correct but the other wrong? If you really want to be a conservative, better to oppose both! Yet both are becoming reality as the generations turn. I’m getting old. I retain a few old-school thought patterns I grew up with. But I realize society is changing—and I’m not here to stop it. My peers and I rebelled, too.[/quote] Gay and different races is totally uncomparable only for some whites this is the same but most brown muslim and black guys are against it but want a white woman. Also homosexuality is a sin in christianity and islam but not interracial. Also its natural to like women if you are male but loving another man is unnatural.
|
|
amenemhab
Junior Member
Posts: 66
Likes: 45
Ethnicity: American
Country: USA
Region: Mountain States
Ancestry: English, Irish, German, others
Politics: Democrat
Religion: Christian
Age: 54
|
Post by amenemhab on Jan 10, 2018 21:18:48 GMT
Gay and different races [are] totally incomparable...most brown Muslim and black guys are against it but want a white woman. Also homosexuality is a sin in Christianity and Islam but not interracial. Also its natural to like women if you are male but loving another man is unnatural. Calling something unnatural, as if what’s natural is “good” and what’s not is “bad,” is the appeal to nature fallacy. If this reasoning were sound, then eating a Caesar salad topped with Amanita phalloides mushrooms would stand recommended. Yet were you to try the experiment, you’d soon fall mortally ill as amatoxins destroyed your liver and your body shut down, spiraling into homeostatic shock and coma while the hospital doctors shook their heads, powerless to rescue you. There’s no antidote. These death caps are perfectly natural, growing all over the place in North America and Europe. From what I hear, they even taste good. About 200 Americans die each year from mushroom poisoning.
Whether you can accept it or not, Mortimer, society changes. Apparently you have accepted this when it comes to race (perhaps because the Roma have been persecuted throughout history), although not everyone has, some using that same appeal to nature to condemn race-mixing, and nearly all 19th- and early 20th-century Westerners declaring it a crime. SeeReviews and Literary Notices: The Laws of Race, as Connected to SlaverySidney George Fisher Review in Atlantic Monthly, February 1861 ebooks.library.cornell.edu/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=atla;cc=atla;view=toc;subview=short;idno=atla0007-2As a Christian, I take care regarding the dangers of sin, whether homo or hetero. Nor am I gay. Yet scholars today actively dispute—and research—original Greek meanings for the words μαλακοὶ (translated male prostitutes in the NRSV) and ἀρσενοκοῖται (Sodomites) in Paul’s 1 Corinthians 6:9, the only New Testament passage taken to expressly condemn homosexuality. Both refer to behavior, not orientation, a concept the ancient world lacked. Yet precisely what behaviors, and in what context, isn’t fully known. It’s believed, based on contemporary extrabiblical sources, that the μαλακοὶ worked in Roman temples, associated with the gods’ cults there.
Early societies, with rampant infectious disease but no vaccines or health care, had some justification to prohibit homosexuality, for they needed every man-woman pair married and pumping out babies as fast as possible to stay ahead of the Grim Reaper. Modern society with its overpopulated world doesn’t need to, however, and younger generations have dropped the issue. See United States Supreme Court Obergefell v. Hodges (legal decision, 2015) www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/14pdf/14-556_3204.pdf
|
|
|
Post by Mortimer on Jan 11, 2018 4:48:35 GMT
Gay and different races [are] totally incomparable...most brown Muslim and black guys are against it but want a white woman. Also homosexuality is a sin in Christianity and Islam but not interracial. Also its natural to like women if you are male but loving another man is unnatural. Calling something unnatural, as if what’s natural is “good” and what’s not is “bad,” is the appeal to nature fallacy. If this reasoning were sound, then eating a Caesar salad topped with Amanita phalloides mushrooms would stand recommended. Yet were you to try the experiment, you’d soon fall mortally ill as amatoxins destroyed your liver and your body shut down, spiraling into homeostatic shock and coma while the hospital doctors shook their heads, powerless to rescue you. There’s no antidote. These death caps are perfectly natural, growing all over the place in North America and Europe. From what I hear, they even taste good. About 200 Americans die each year from mushroom poisoning.
Whether you can accept it or not, Mortimer, society changes. Apparently you have accepted this when it comes to race (perhaps because the Roma have been persecuted throughout history), although not everyone has, some using that same appeal to nature to condemn race-mixing, and nearly all 19th- and early 20th-century Westerners declaring it a crime. SeeReviews and Literary Notices: The Laws of Race, as Connected to SlaverySidney George Fisher Review in Atlantic Monthly, February 1861 ebooks.library.cornell.edu/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=atla;cc=atla;view=toc;subview=short;idno=atla0007-2As a Christian, I take care regarding the dangers of sin, whether homo or hetero. Nor am I gay. Yet scholars today actively dispute—and research—original Greek meanings for the words μαλακοὶ (translated male prostitutes in the NRSV) and ἀρσενοκοῖται (Sodomites) in Paul’s 1 Corinthians 6:9, the only New Testament passage taken to expressly condemn homosexuality. Both refer to behavior, not orientation, a concept the ancient world lacked. Yet precisely what behaviors, and in what context, isn’t fully known. It’s believed, based on contemporary extrabiblical sources, that the μαλακοὶ worked in Roman temples, associated with the gods’ cults there.
Early societies, with rampant infectious disease but no vaccines or health care, had some justification to prohibit homosexuality, for they needed every man-woman pair married and pumping out babies as fast as possible to stay ahead of the Grim Reaper. Modern society with its overpopulated world doesn’t need to, however, and younger generations have dropped the issue. See United States Supreme Court Obergefell v. Hodges (legal decision, 2015) www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/14pdf/14-556_3204.pdf1. I didnt "accepted" the change when it comes to race, because I never had this way of thinking or shared this way of thinking to begin with. I said already that only for some whites/western people it was a crime, but not for the rest of the world or in many cultures. Whats with all the black guys who are against homosexuality but like white women? Same as brown guys or arab sheikhs or turkish pashas. That means Im not white I dont share the same mindset as whites and never did, in my family we think that dark guys like blonde girls and dark girls like blonde guys and that this is "natural" (like oppossites attract). In white culture or some western culture its a crime, but never was for us. But we think homosexuality is a abomination. 2.Yes natural/unnatural is debatable. Forget that argument. 3.Some churches accepted homosexuality and altered thousand years old christian beliefs and traditions, but if you read the bible you will see that immorality is very much despised including men with men and women with women. And the text about immorality in the old testament pretty much is also still valid for the new testament, not everything from the old testament is valid, but the passage on immorality is, because the new testament often speaks of immorality, and that this is very much despised, the new testament says "that our bodies are the temple of god and we shouldnt be immoral because in our bodies is the holy spirit and its the temple of god". Not only homosexuality is a sin but also incest for example or bestiality. Read the text on immorality. Leviticus 18New International Version (NIV) Unlawful Relations 18 The Lord said to Moses, 2 “Speak to the Israelites and say to them: ‘I am the Lord your God. 3 You must not do as they do in Egypt, where you used to live, and you must not do as they do in the land of Canaan, where I am bringing you. Do not follow their practices. 4 You must obey my laws and be careful to follow my decrees. I am the Lord your God. 5 Keep my decrees and laws, for the person who obeys them will live by them. I am the Lord. 6 “‘No one is to approach any close relative to have relations. I am the Lord. 7 “‘Do not dishonor your father by having relations with your mother. She is your mother; do not have relations with her. 8 “‘Do not have relations with your father’s wife; that would dishonor your father. 9 “‘Do not have relations with your sister, either your father’s daughter or your mother’s daughter, whether she was born in the same home or elsewhere. 10 “‘Do not have relations with your son’s daughter or your daughter’s daughter; that would dishonor you. 11 “‘Do not have relations with the daughter of your father’s wife, born to your father; she is your sister. 12 “‘Do not have relations with your father’s sister; she is your father’s close relative. 13 “‘Do not have relations with your mother’s sister, because she is your mother’s close relative. 14 “‘Do not dishonor your father’s brother by approaching his wife to have relations; she is your aunt. 15 “‘Do not have relations with your daughter-in-law. She is your son’s wife; do not have relations with her. 16 “‘Do not have relations with your brother’s wife; that would dishonor your brother. 17 “‘Do not have relations with both a woman and her daughter. Do not have relations with either her son’s daughter or her daughter’s daughter; they are her close relatives. That is wickedness. 18 “‘Do not take your wife’s sister as a rival wife and have relations with her while your wife is living. 19 “‘Do not approach a woman to have relations during the uncleanness of her monthly period. 20 “‘Do not have relations with your neighbor’s wife and defile yourself with her. 21 “‘Do not give any of your children to be sacrificed to Molek, for you must not profane the name of your God. I am the Lord. 22 “‘Do not have relations with a man as one does with a woman; that is detestable. 23 “‘Do not have relations with an animal and defile yourself with it. A woman must not present herself to an animal to have relations with it; that is a perversion. 24 “‘Do not defile yourselves in any of these ways, because this is how the nations that I am going to drive out before you became defiled. 25 Even the land was defiled; so I punished it for its sin, and the land vomited out its inhabitants. 26 But you must keep my decrees and my laws. The native-born and the foreigners residing among you must not do any of these detestable things, 27 for all these things were done by the people who lived in the land before you, and the land became defiled. 28 And if you defile the land, it will vomit you out as it vomited out the nations that were before you. 29 “‘Everyone who does any of these detestable things—such persons must be cut off from their people. 30 Keep my requirements and do not follow any of the detestable customs that were practiced before you came and do not defile yourselves with them. I am the Lord your God.’” www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Leviticus%2018
|
|
ZeroInteruppt
Junior Member
I still beleive in fairy tales. I really do.
Posts: 72
Likes: 57
Country: USA
Region: California
Ancestry: Marine Corps.
Politics: I refuse to classify
Hero: People who live deliberately
Age: Old soul
|
Post by ZeroInteruppt on Jan 11, 2018 4:59:10 GMT
I’m a humanist. And a bloody fool of a romantic. Love is merely that, love. I’m not talking about what turns you on or what kind of freaky you want to be, but love. As someone who has been in love I cannot deny that to two people no more than I can go out and cut someone’s eyes out so they never see a rainbow.
|
|
Brythonic Warrior
Full Member
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3850E0QB89c
Posts: 146
Likes: 129
Ethnicity: Scytho-Celtic
Country: Prydain
Region: Cymru
Location: Siluria
Ancestry: Brythonic, Gaelic, Gaulish
Taxonomy: Alpinised Atlanto-Brünn
Y-DNA: R-S476
mtDNA: H
Religion: Cult of the Sacred Triune
Hero: People with sense.
Philosophy: Ernst Junger, Troy Southgate, Varg Vikernes, Anacharsis, Neven Hénaff, Yann Goulet, Julian Cayo-Evans, Dennis Coslett
|
Post by Brythonic Warrior on Oct 22, 2018 15:07:18 GMT
It is not something I find attractive to myself, but I have no power to stop it, so it happens.
|
|
|
Post by Polaris on Oct 22, 2018 17:08:54 GMT
I am wondering why in almost all the picture the white is the female?
|
|