|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Sept 6, 2022 21:16:53 GMT
If atoms don't change, they don't have any future, nor past. What about the present? Do they have it?
No-soul objects don't need in nay time. For why? The next second is the same as the previous, the future = the past.
A person cares. For a person it makes sense what's gonna happen tomorrow. And any next minute. Some people care.
And time create that purposes, allow meaning to appear right after our view of that near future. It makes sense.
If S :: A will be in future as B, and we don't want A to become C, but we'd like A became B, then S is what makes sense.
Example: a seed of an apple buried into the soil will bring apple fruits. But if instead of fruits it had brought potatoes, it wouldn't make any sense.
However, it's not definitely. If that seed is a potato one, we will use it in different situation, or will sell it.
It seems like anything makes sense, that is predictable. But without time, any predictions fade out.
And again, if something doesn't change or changes constantly, then it only a surface where sense is being made.
If to long this thought, and to add functions in it (I'll try to introduce and to explain it a little later) it will encounter a paradox, that any meaningful things are uncertain, and they are out of sense.
(Briefly, to make sense that something must be governed, and predictable. Predictions must be previously unknown, and a function of such things must not be tautology. But in this case, any such functions make no sense as unpredictable.)
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Sept 29, 2022 22:52:02 GMT
An algorithm is a pattern, a pattern is the repetition of substance/form, repetition is circular thus an algorithm is cyclical. Take for example 1+2=3, it is the repetition of 1: 1+(1+1)=(1+1+1). Algorithm = Game Coding.
Cycle = Game Interface.Yet the interface and coding result in one another.
|
|
|
Post by IM LITERALLY NEO on Sept 29, 2022 23:04:50 GMT
Algorithm = Game Coding.
Cycle = Game Interface. Yet the interface and coding result in one another. Without The Game Coding (Algorithm) There Is No Game Interface (Cycle). Algorithm Is A Deeper Aspect Than A Cycle; People Know How To Use A Computer, But People Don't Know How To Make A Computer.
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Oct 4, 2022 18:35:38 GMT
Yet the interface and coding result in one another. Without The Game Coding (Algorithm) There Is No Game Interface (Cycle). Algorithm Is A Deeper Aspect Than A Cycle; People Know How To Use A Computer, But People Don't Know How To Make A Computer.But without the cycle there is no algorithm. Without coding there is no computer, how a computer is formed requires knowledge of coding. Considering algorithms determine cycles the cycle is connected to the algorithm. Considering, as well, the cycle determines the algorithm...they are both interchangeable.
|
|