|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Jun 16, 2022 20:12:58 GMT
If observation is dependent upon only itself, as it must be if one considers there is nothing separate from observation, it is dependent upon nothing as only observation existing leaves no room for comparison thus resulting in formless no-thingness.
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Sept 11, 2022 22:24:02 GMT
And they fail under there own rules. They Only Fail If People Stop Using Fallacy Over Practicality. As Long As People Keep Using Fallacies, Rumors, Hearsay, Emotional Bias, Confirmation Bias, Feigning Of The Truth Despite Irrefutable Evidence, Opinions, Scapegoats, Adages, Quotes, Contradictions, Subjective Perception, Over True Intentions And True Observations, This World Will Always Be A Boiling Pot Of Willful Ignorance.
Furthermore, I Often Noticed That If Someone Can't Speak PRACTICALLY, They Speak PARODOXICALLY, Which Is What You Are Doing. Instead Of Removing The Contradictions Of Your Poor Arguments, You Complicate It Even More By Creating Circular Rationalizations That Have No Place In A Genuine Atmosphere. You Simply Aren't Here To See The Errors In Your Words.
I Am Here To Help You See The Error In Your Way Of Thinking, But It's Like Convincing A Gold Digger They Are A Gold Digger; When People Want An Affirmation For An Erroneous Reason, They Don't Care About Observation And Objectivity, They Only Care About Themselves And Reduce Their Response To Deflection And Denial With Zero Chance Of Reconciliation (But I Try).Practicality is relative as what is practical to some is not practical to others. For example your statements are not practical to me and alot of other people but they are practical to you. Practicality, as relative, is paradoxical as it both exists and does not exist when all possible contexts are applied.
|
|
|
Post by IM LITERALLY NEO on Sept 11, 2022 22:46:40 GMT
They Only Fail If People Stop Using Fallacy Over Practicality. As Long As People Keep Using Fallacies, Rumors, Hearsay, Emotional Bias, Confirmation Bias, Feigning Of The Truth Despite Irrefutable Evidence, Opinions, Scapegoats, Adages, Quotes, Contradictions, Subjective Perception, Over True Intentions And True Observations, This World Will Always Be A Boiling Pot Of Willful Ignorance.
Furthermore, I Often Noticed That If Someone Can't Speak PRACTICALLY, They Speak PARODOXICALLY, Which Is What You Are Doing. Instead Of Removing The Contradictions Of Your Poor Arguments, You Complicate It Even More By Creating Circular Rationalizations That Have No Place In A Genuine Atmosphere. You Simply Aren't Here To See The Errors In Your Words.
I Am Here To Help You See The Error In Your Way Of Thinking, But It's Like Convincing A Gold Digger They Are A Gold Digger; When People Want An Affirmation For An Erroneous Reason, They Don't Care About Observation And Objectivity, They Only Care About Themselves And Reduce Their Response To Deflection And Denial With Zero Chance Of Reconciliation (But I Try). Practicality is relative as what is practical to some is not practical to others. For example your statements are not practical to me and alot of other people but they are practical to you. Practicality, as relative, is paradoxical as it both exists and does not exist when all possible contexts are applied. Practicality Is Measured By Objectivity, Based On The Universe's Least Amount Of Consequence Per Action, And Based On The Efficiency Per Action Compared To Any Other Action (Where Multiple Actions Could Be Practical By Sharing Similar Results).
You Are Trying To Undermine The Practicality Of My Words, To Reinforce Your Paradoxical Scapegoat Perception, It's Not Wise.
Furthermore, Multiple People Have Called You Out On The Same Logical Fallacy, Including People That Always Disagree On Every Other Subject, This Alone Should Convince You To Reconsider Your Entire Ontological Framework, But You Never Do.
I Will Say This Again, The Universe Is A Super Quantum Computer, Your Thinking Level Is Binary And Like An Apple Mac, You Should Improve Your Arguments, Instead Of Looking For More Circular Excuses (That Have Been Called Out By Not Just Me).
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Sept 11, 2022 22:52:00 GMT
Practicality is relative as what is practical to some is not practical to others. For example your statements are not practical to me and alot of other people but they are practical to you. Practicality, as relative, is paradoxical as it both exists and does not exist when all possible contexts are applied. Practicality Is Measured By Objectivity, Based On The Universe's Least Amount Of Consequence Per Action, And Based On The Efficiency Per Action Compared To Any Other Action (Where Multiple Actions Could Be Practical By Sharing Similar Results).
You Are Trying To Undermine The Practicality Of My Words, To Reinforce Your Paradoxical Scapegoat Perception, It's Not Wise.
Furthermore, Multiple People Have Called You Out On The Same Logical Fallacy, Including People That Always Disagree On Every Other Subject, This Alone Should Convince You To Reconsider Your Entire Ontological Framework, But You Never Do.
I Will Say This Again, The Universe Is A Super Quantum Computer, Your Thinking Level Is Binary And Like An Apple Mac, You Should Improve Your Arguments, Instead Of Looking For More Circular Excuses (That Have Been Called Out By Not Just Me).
What is efficient in one respect is not efficient in another. Take for example chopping wood. It is efficient for exercise but not efficient to a woodsplitter; a woodsplitter is efficient for splitting wood but not efficient for exercise. And stop resorting to group agreement, that is the bandwagon fallacy (and you believe in the fallacies). You contradict yourself under your own standards.
|
|
|
Post by IM LITERALLY NEO on Sept 11, 2022 23:18:16 GMT
Practicality Is Measured By Objectivity, Based On The Universe's Least Amount Of Consequence Per Action, And Based On The Efficiency Per Action Compared To Any Other Action (Where Multiple Actions Could Be Practical By Sharing Similar Results).
You Are Trying To Undermine The Practicality Of My Words, To Reinforce Your Paradoxical Scapegoat Perception, It's Not Wise.
Furthermore, Multiple People Have Called You Out On The Same Logical Fallacy, Including People That Always Disagree On Every Other Subject, This Alone Should Convince You To Reconsider Your Entire Ontological Framework, But You Never Do.
I Will Say This Again, The Universe Is A Super Quantum Computer, Your Thinking Level Is Binary And Like An Apple Mac, You Should Improve Your Arguments, Instead Of Looking For More Circular Excuses (That Have Been Called Out By Not Just Me).
What is efficient in one respect is not efficient in another. Take for example chopping wood. It is efficient for exercise but not efficient to a woodsplitter; a woodsplitter is efficient for splitting wood but not efficient for exercise. And stop resorting to group agreement, that is the bandwagon fallacy (and you believe in the fallacies). You contradict yourself under your own standards. I Am Not The Type To Put Weight On Things Like That, Because I Have The Big Philosophical Points To Make. However, It Still Stands As A Consequence Towards Your Lack Of Judgement On Philosophical Debates, You Resort To Too Many Fallacies, Subjective Circulatory Interpretations Of Reality And Linguistics, And It Has Not Only Been Made Apparent To Me, But Others That Came To Their Own Conclusions Of Your "Philosophy", And It's The Same Exact Point (Again, You Can't Call It A Bandwagon, When It Involves People That NEVER Agree On Anything Else, This Just Shows How Bad Your Argument Points Are).
There Is No Contradiction On My Side Of This, You In All Actuality Are Indeed Beyond Any Doubt Making Contradicting Circulatory Consensuses. Then, When Called Out, You Defend Logical Fallacies With Even More Logical Fallacies.
|
|
|
Post by MAYA-EL on Sept 12, 2022 14:47:50 GMT
And they fail under there own rules. They Only Fail If People Stop Using Fallacy Over Practicality. As Long As People Keep Using Fallacies, Rumors, Hearsay, Emotional Bias, Confirmation Bias, Feigning Of The Truth Despite Irrefutable Evidence, Opinions, Scapegoats, Adages, Quotes, Contradictions, Subjective Perception, Over True Intentions And True Observations, This World Will Always Be A Boiling Pot Of Willful Ignorance.
Furthermore, I Often Noticed That If Someone Can't Speak PRACTICALLY, They Speak PARODOXICALLY, Which Is What You Are Doing. Instead Of Removing The Contradictions Of Your Poor Arguments, You Complicate It Even More By Creating Circular Rationalizations That Have No Place In A Genuine Atmosphere. You Simply Aren't Here To See The Errors In Your Words.
I Am Here To Help You See The Error In Your Way Of Thinking, But It's Like Convincing A Gold Digger They Are A Gold Digger; When People Want An Affirmation For An Erroneous Reason, They Don't Care About Observation And Objectivity, They Only Care About Themselves And Reduce Their Response To Deflection And Denial With Zero Chance Of Reconciliation (But I Try).You forgot to add "Jesus complex" to your list you wrote in the beginning of your reply, Which now that I think of it I remember hearing this guy on a YouTube channel talking about when he was locked up in the looney bin for 3 months he said he was put in their by his mom and dad (he was 19yr old) and he said the past like 5 years their has been a major surge in popularity of the mental illness called The jesus complex For whatever reason it has become the new popular thing in the Looney bin not too sure why perhaps maybe it's our ability to have information at our fingertips or one of the other many possibilities but I digress.
|
|
|
Post by IM LITERALLY NEO on Sept 12, 2022 19:35:32 GMT
They Only Fail If People Stop Using Fallacy Over Practicality. As Long As People Keep Using Fallacies, Rumors, Hearsay, Emotional Bias, Confirmation Bias, Feigning Of The Truth Despite Irrefutable Evidence, Opinions, Scapegoats, Adages, Quotes, Contradictions, Subjective Perception, Over True Intentions And True Observations, This World Will Always Be A Boiling Pot Of Willful Ignorance.
Furthermore, I Often Noticed That If Someone Can't Speak PRACTICALLY, They Speak PARODOXICALLY, Which Is What You Are Doing. Instead Of Removing The Contradictions Of Your Poor Arguments, You Complicate It Even More By Creating Circular Rationalizations That Have No Place In A Genuine Atmosphere. You Simply Aren't Here To See The Errors In Your Words.
I Am Here To Help You See The Error In Your Way Of Thinking, But It's Like Convincing A Gold Digger They Are A Gold Digger; When People Want An Affirmation For An Erroneous Reason, They Don't Care About Observation And Objectivity, They Only Care About Themselves And Reduce Their Response To Deflection And Denial With Zero Chance Of Reconciliation (But I Try). You forgot to add "Jesus complex" to your list you wrote in the beginning of your reply, Which now that I think of it I remember hearing this guy on a YouTube channel talking about when he was locked up in the looney bin for 3 months he said he was put in their by his mom and dad (he was 19yr old) and he said the past like 5 years their has been a major surge in popularity of the mental illness called The jesus complex For whatever reason it has become the new popular thing in the Looney bin not too sure why perhaps maybe it's our ability to have information at our fingertips or one of the other many possibilities but I digress. You Are Going To Need A Better Attitude And Perspective To Handle What Will Inevitably Occur On 9 . 13 . 2022, Just Because You Don't Understand How Formulas Work, It Doesn't Mean They Don't Work, My Formulas Solved Riemann's Hypothesis. People With A "Jesus Complex" Can't Even Do Basic Formulas, Let Alone Solve A Problem Unsolved For Thousands Of Years.
|
|
|
Post by MAYA-EL on Sept 12, 2022 20:10:45 GMT
You forgot to add "Jesus complex" to your list you wrote in the beginning of your reply, Which now that I think of it I remember hearing this guy on a YouTube channel talking about when he was locked up in the looney bin for 3 months he said he was put in their by his mom and dad (he was 19yr old) and he said the past like 5 years their has been a major surge in popularity of the mental illness called The jesus complex For whatever reason it has become the new popular thing in the Looney bin not too sure why perhaps maybe it's our ability to have information at our fingertips or one of the other many possibilities but I digress. You Are Going To Need A Better Attitude And Perspective To Handle What Will Inevitably Occur On 9 . 13 . 2022, Just Because You Don't Understand How Formulas Work, It Doesn't Mean They Don't Work, My Formulas Solved Riemann's Hypothesis. People With A "Jesus Complex" Can't Even Do Basic Formulas, Let Alone Solve A Problem Unsolved For Thousands Of Years.So if you're plane crashed next week and you found yourself the only survivor in the middle of the rainforest or the Mojave desert how would this solved equation help you survive? How is it applicable in order to better your life?
|
|
|
Post by IM LITERALLY NEO on Sept 12, 2022 20:31:48 GMT
You Are Going To Need A Better Attitude And Perspective To Handle What Will Inevitably Occur On 9 . 13 . 2022, Just Because You Don't Understand How Formulas Work, It Doesn't Mean They Don't Work, My Formulas Solved Riemann's Hypothesis. People With A "Jesus Complex" Can't Even Do Basic Formulas, Let Alone Solve A Problem Unsolved For Thousands Of Years. So if you're plane crashed next week and you found yourself the only survivor in the middle of the rainforest or the Mojave desert how would this solved equation help you survive? How is it applicable in order to better your life? There Are Plenty Of People Out There That Had Normal Lives, While Being Also The Ones Solving Mysteries And Problems. You Keep Equating Someone's Hard Work To Not Having A Normal Life, When Both Can Be Done Simultaneously.
|
|
|
Post by MAYA-EL on Sept 13, 2022 8:57:29 GMT
So if you're plane crashed next week and you found yourself the only survivor in the middle of the rainforest or the Mojave desert how would this solved equation help you survive? How is it applicable in order to better your life? There Are Plenty Of People Out There That Had Normal Lives, While Being Also The Ones Solving Mysteries And Problems. You Keep Equating Someone's Hard Work To Not Having A Normal Life, When Both Can Be Done Simultaneously.Then that makes you normal by your own definition
|
|
|
Post by IM LITERALLY NEO on Sept 13, 2022 15:19:44 GMT
There Are Plenty Of People Out There That Had Normal Lives, While Being Also The Ones Solving Mysteries And Problems. You Keep Equating Someone's Hard Work To Not Having A Normal Life, When Both Can Be Done Simultaneously. Then that makes you normal by your own definition Not Exactly, I Have Simultaneously Lived A Normal Life To The Point People Don't Know About What I Am; It's Like Superman.
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Sept 15, 2022 21:19:57 GMT
What is efficient in one respect is not efficient in another. Take for example chopping wood. It is efficient for exercise but not efficient to a woodsplitter; a woodsplitter is efficient for splitting wood but not efficient for exercise. And stop resorting to group agreement, that is the bandwagon fallacy (and you believe in the fallacies). You contradict yourself under your own standards. I Am Not The Type To Put Weight On Things Like That, Because I Have The Big Philosophical Points To Make. However, It Still Stands As A Consequence Towards Your Lack Of Judgement On Philosophical Debates, You Resort To Too Many Fallacies, Subjective Circulatory Interpretations Of Reality And Linguistics, And It Has Not Only Been Made Apparent To Me, But Others That Came To Their Own Conclusions Of Your "Philosophy", And It's The Same Exact Point (Again, You Can't Call It A Bandwagon, When It Involves People That NEVER Agree On Anything Else, This Just Shows How Bad Your Argument Points Are).
There Is No Contradiction On My Side Of This, You In All Actuality Are Indeed Beyond Any Doubt Making Contradicting Circulatory Consensuses. Then, When Called Out, You Defend Logical Fallacies With Even More Logical Fallacies.From my angle the fallacies contradict themselves. From your angle the fallacies do not and yet you still fall prey to them, you fail under your own rules.
|
|
|
Post by IM LITERALLY NEO on Sept 15, 2022 23:06:10 GMT
I Am Not The Type To Put Weight On Things Like That, Because I Have The Big Philosophical Points To Make. However, It Still Stands As A Consequence Towards Your Lack Of Judgement On Philosophical Debates, You Resort To Too Many Fallacies, Subjective Circulatory Interpretations Of Reality And Linguistics, And It Has Not Only Been Made Apparent To Me, But Others That Came To Their Own Conclusions Of Your "Philosophy", And It's The Same Exact Point (Again, You Can't Call It A Bandwagon, When It Involves People That NEVER Agree On Anything Else, This Just Shows How Bad Your Argument Points Are).
There Is No Contradiction On My Side Of This, You In All Actuality Are Indeed Beyond Any Doubt Making Contradicting Circulatory Consensuses. Then, When Called Out, You Defend Logical Fallacies With Even More Logical Fallacies. From my angle the fallacies contradict themselves. From your angle the fallacies do not and yet you still fall prey to them, you fail under your own rules. No Fallacies On My Side, I Don't Resort To Circulatory Fallacies, Everything I Stated Is As Practical As It Gets.
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Sept 29, 2022 21:06:34 GMT
From my angle the fallacies contradict themselves. From your angle the fallacies do not and yet you still fall prey to them, you fail under your own rules. No Fallacies On My Side, I Don't Resort To Circulatory Fallacies, Everything I Stated Is As Practical As It Gets.Practical is relative, pointing to armageddon all the time is impractical to some as it is a priori to some that everything is always ending due to the nature of change. Dually always cycling back to math, to explain your argument, is the same thing repeating thus is circular. You claim "the math is correct because the math is correct".
|
|
|
Post by IM LITERALLY NEO on Sept 29, 2022 22:29:31 GMT
No Fallacies On My Side, I Don't Resort To Circulatory Fallacies, Everything I Stated Is As Practical As It Gets. Practical is relative, pointing to armageddon all the time is impractical to some as it is a priori to some that everything is always ending due to the nature of change. Dually always cycling back to math, to explain your argument, is the same thing repeating thus is circular. You claim "the math is correct because the math is correct". The Nature Of Change Has Always Been Around, But The True Ending Of Planet Earth Is Beyond The Faculties Of Change, It Is Transformation From The Beyond For The First Time That Actually Involves The Exit / Exodus Of Humans That Behaved In This Prison.
There Is No Relativity Here, I Have Perfect Formulas For Euler's Function And PI, That's Not Relativity, That's Perfect Objectivity.
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Sept 29, 2022 22:36:16 GMT
Practical is relative, pointing to armageddon all the time is impractical to some as it is a priori to some that everything is always ending due to the nature of change. Dually always cycling back to math, to explain your argument, is the same thing repeating thus is circular. You claim "the math is correct because the math is correct". The Nature Of Change Has Always Been Around, But The True Ending Of Planet Earth Is Beyond The Faculties Of Change, It Is Transformation From The Beyond For The First Time That Actually Involves The Exit / Exodus Of Humans That Behaved In This Prison.
There Is No Relativity Here, I Have Perfect Formulas For Euler's Function And PI, That's Not Relativity, That's Perfect Objectivity.The ending of one thing is the beginning of another so nothing really changes in this respect considering the underlying substance/form, of that which "changes", is repeated again. The destruction of this planet is the beginning of another. Yet know one agrees one perfection, you math is you interpretation otherwise you would be universally accepted...and you are not.
|
|