|
Post by Lone Wanderer on Apr 17, 2022 7:43:12 GMT
New research shows that people with blue eyes have a single, common ancestor. Scientists have tracked down a genetic mutation which took place 6,000-10,000 years ago and is the cause of the eye color of all blue-eyed humans alive on the planet today. "Originally, we all had brown eyes," said Professor Hans Eiberg from the Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine. Variation in the colour of the eyes from brown to green can all be explained by the amount of melanin in the iris, but blue-eyed individuals only have a small degree of variation in the amount of melanin in their eyes. "From this we can conclude that all blue-eyed individuals are linked to the same ancestor," says Professor Eiberg. "They have all inherited the same switch at exactly the same spot in their DNA." Brown-eyed individuals, by contrast, have considerable individual variation in the area of their DNA that controls melanin production.The mutation of brown eyes to blue represents neither a positive nor a negative mutation. It is one of several mutations such as hair colour, baldness, freckles and beauty spots, which neither increases nor reduces a human's chance of survival. As Professor Eiberg says, "it simply shows that nature is constantly shuffling the human genome, creating a genetic cocktail of human chromosomes and trying out different changes as it does so." -- www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/01/080130170343.htm
|
|
lamburk
Full Member
Posts: 227
Likes: 80
|
Post by lamburk on Jun 9, 2022 10:09:32 GMT
//Generalized moral judgements have to be comparative to be meaningful. USA is more racist than whom?
//
Isn't the KKK emerged in USA itself? And, there are lot of black lives matter, and anti discrimination against non whites. EWell, I am not saying that I hate america. All I am saying that there are specific groups in USA, who are racists, and they even push many whites as part of their racialism. It's deepely embedded in the society of USA. IT has nothing to do with me being born in India. I am not even talking for racism which Indians encounter in USA. Racial supremacist people in USA are racist against russians also.
// Its still just about the only country that even managed to have a president of another ethnicity (Obama).//
That's politics, but, many people, who are part of racialism were not happy. anyways, even I knew, that they are wrong and for the good.
//I deal daily with racist Americans, they are terrible. Openly supporting Hitler. Racism is rife everywhere.//
I am talking about these type of people, who are indeed stupid. They don't want to learn anything new.
//To India's credit they have adopted English as a language from beyond its shores for sake of international pragmatism.//
Besides, many people who occupied Indian politics, had good knowledge of English, and they wanted to teach this to many of the feudal societies of India. There's a difference between an educated person in India, who understands India really well, and educated people in India, who has no Idea about India at all, like today's generation of Indians are.
English was thrusted upon people of India, during british raj, for administrative purpose. But, when they left, it still was kept intact. Even if Indian people can speak impeccable english, there still will not be acceptance by any of the white races. Educated Indians are just viewed as subservient, while, illiterate as slaves.
Probably, India is the only nation on this planet, which still is not able to deal with it's colonial history past, and record is very abysmal.
|
|
lamburk
Full Member
Posts: 227
Likes: 80
|
Post by lamburk on Jun 9, 2022 10:20:08 GMT
//This is where we need to carefully separate Ideology from Ethnicity. The west has been successful because of its Christian Heritage.//
On the contrary, europe had dark ages, when ,they chose christianity. The tales are very well written.
In fact, europe had it's golden age, during the administrative ruling of the two of the most hated groups - arabs and jews.
Arabs colony at al-andalus was centre of learning, while german jews invented modern technology like printing press, which made paper printing and currency possible.
It were the arabs, due to whom columbus was able to set on the ship. So, I think, christian europe was pretty much lame.
|
|
|
Post by jonbain on Jun 9, 2022 12:04:52 GMT
//Generalized moral judgements have to be comparative to be meaningful. USA is more racist than whom? // Isn't the KKK emerged in USA itself? And, there are lot of black lives matter, and anti discrimination against non whites. EWell, I am not saying that I hate america. All I am saying that there are specific groups in USA, who are racists, and they even push many whites as part of their racialism. It's deepely embedded in the society of USA. IT has nothing to do with me being born in India. I am not even talking for racism which Indians encounter in USA. Racial supremacist people in USA are racist against russians also. // Its still just about the only country that even managed to have a president of another ethnicity (Obama).// That's politics, but, many people, who are part of racialism were not happy. anyways, even I knew, that they are wrong and for the good. //I deal daily with racist Americans, they are terrible. Openly supporting Hitler. Racism is rife everywhere.// I am talking about these type of people, who are indeed stupid. They don't want to learn anything new. //To India's credit they have adopted English as a language from beyond its shores for sake of international pragmatism.// Besides, many people who occupied Indian politics, had good knowledge of English, and they wanted to teach this to many of the feudal societies of India. There's a difference between an educated person in India, who understands India really well, and educated people in India, who has no Idea about India at all, like today's generation of Indians are. English was thrusted upon people of India, during british raj, for administrative purpose. But, when they left, it still was kept intact. Even if Indian people can speak impeccable english, there still will not be acceptance by any of the white races. Educated Indians are just viewed as subservient, while, illiterate as slaves. Probably, India is the only nation on this planet, which still is not able to deal with it's colonial history past, and record is very abysmal.
Sadly most people see others as subservient. I am effectively an outcast simply because people don't like my hairstyle. Of all ethnic origins.
My hair is a consequence of my religion, and thus it is my psy-op against
the atheist-saxon cultural structure which dominates the west. It is very hierarchical; but in a superficial way.
Its interesting you say the american presidents are celtic-norse. Most of the tyrannical racist hierarchy is saxon or roman.
These tyrants treat everyone as their slave if you let them get away with it. Even their 'fellow whites' they trample on with disdain at any opportunity.
If India had not adopted English, they likely would be in an even worse position,
and be entirely over-powered by the communist-russian-chinese tyranny.
You speak against the Hindus, but Christianity was 'taught' to me in
such a deplorable manner, that the only way I could find my way back into the spirit of Jesus, was by adopting many beliefs of the Hindu's, such as reincarnation and karma. I was even a vegetarian for years to try and purge the aggression they put in me.
I must have been a tyrant in past lives to have had to endure what the afrikaners did to me throughout my childhood.
Not that such excuses them.
But it prevents me from laying all the blame on them. Even though I can never trust them again.
I am very happy to be in africa. I doubt I will leave here.
|
|
|
Post by jonbain on Jun 9, 2022 12:09:53 GMT
//This is where we need to carefully separate Ideology from Ethnicity. The west has been successful because of its Christian Heritage.// On the contrary, europe had dark ages, when ,they chose christianity. The tales are very well written. In fact, europe had it's golden age, during the administrative ruling of the two of the most hated groups - arabs and jews. Arabs colony at al-andalus was centre of learning, while german jews invented modern technology like printing press, which made paper printing and currency possible. It were the arabs, due to whom columbus was able to set on the ship. So, I think, christian europe was pretty much lame.
The dark ages were not so dark. The long haul to literacy takes centuries, and the Christian church led the way. The majority of people in those times may have waved Christian flags to honor the monarchy and the church, but they were crude illiterate peasants who understood very little as to what that actually entails.
The other great success of the west was the Viking naval technology, which really made so much difference.
Strangely, the Viking narrative is often said to be 'pre-Christian', but it was only written down for the first time in the 9th century AD.
In all effect, its actually post-Christian for the most part. And the other legacy, is all the evil tales told about the Vikings were written by the saxons.
|
|
lamburk
Full Member
Posts: 227
Likes: 80
|
Post by lamburk on Jun 10, 2022 5:09:56 GMT
//The other great success of the west was the Viking naval technology, which really made so much difference.
Strangely, the Viking narrative is often said to be 'pre-Christian', but it was only written down for the first time in the 9th century AD./
shhhh, don't tell this to anglo saxon or they would call you destructor of europe. Eternal Anglos.
//Its interesting you say the american presidents are celtic-norse. Most of the tyrannical racist hierarchy is saxon or roman. //
I read somewhere, I don't remember, an old article, in which it was mentioned that roman/latin people used to pick away german girls. So saxons technically are miscegenated people of roman/latin people, who were another Indo-Europeans, who founded rome.
Interestingly, even julius caser is also classified as keltic-nordic. And romans also considered themselves closer to kets or germanics and not to medditerneans.
|
|
lamburk
Full Member
Posts: 227
Likes: 80
|
Post by lamburk on Jun 11, 2022 9:41:44 GMT
//Its interesting you say the american presidents are celtic-norse. Most of the tyrannical racist hierarchy is saxon or roman.
These tyrants treat everyone as their slave if you let them get away with it. Even their 'fellow whites' they trample on with disdain at any opportunity.
//
However, anglo saxons and keltic-norse britons are not same. This must be kept in mind.
Like Indian brahmins and north eurasian are not same. Anglo Saxon were two tribes in germany. Being anglo saxon was cultural, not racial one. Britons turned this into racial one, and called themselves anglo saxon, because they speak english.
//If India had not adopted English, they likely would be in an even worse position,
and be entirely over-powered by the communist-russian-chinese tyranny.//
It's only services which has been generated, and yes, it has done good for India's middle class people, who otherwise were suffering under nehruvian socialism, but, still, it's now vital for modern India to shun away their colonial past, and all natives here, going back to their roots, which was farming. Only this can save the real Indian people.
|
|
lamburk
Full Member
Posts: 227
Likes: 80
|
Post by lamburk on Jun 17, 2022 4:38:13 GMT
//Strangely, the Viking narrative is often said to be 'pre-Christian', but it was only written down for the first time in the 9th century AD. //
But those NORSE GODS, could not defeat arabs, during their raids at seville. Anyways, even I know, viking means sea pirateers, and not a race or ethnicity. Anyone who used to think like them, would be a viking.
Never heard anglo saxon fighting any war against arabs or turks, directly, though yes, they made others to fight with turks or arabs or iran, like russia was made to fight against turks at crimea. But anglo saxon never did a war openly.
The group which drove islam out of europe were french and spanish people, not anglo saxon or norse people. And even russians deserve a credit here, because, during the times of USSR, islam was suppressed brutally. English people never fought against islamic rule, and they cannot, and the way london city has become now, it's evident. Afghanistan has driven out entire US army, despite being backward in terms of technology. The reason for this defeat of west by islam is because, islam in reality has a tribal and feudal culture, and democratic people, sponsored by banks , with trade and mercantile interests cannot fight against islam. One needs to be brutal and tyrannical like them only.
And I really don't know, why ruling class of India have kept british system intact, even today, despite trying to implement a socialist model, based on central planning style of erstwhile USSR.
|
|
zef
Junior Member
Posts: 54
Likes: 6
Politics: Virtues are habits of the soul by which one acts well, for the sake of what is fine and noble.
Religion: Western Mystery Tradition
Relationship Status: Always answer the phone if it rings.
Hero: Alice Deejay
Age: Mesolithic Age
Philosophy: That only the bourgeoisie has the luxury to make themselves what they are through their choices
|
Post by zef on Jul 7, 2022 18:18:15 GMT
//Strangely, the Viking narrative is often said to be 'pre-Christian', but it was only written down for the first time in the 9th century AD. // But those NORSE GODS, could not defeat arabs, during their raids at seville. Anyways, even I know, viking means sea pirateers, and not a race or ethnicity. Anyone who used to think like them, would be a viking. Never heard anglo saxon fighting any war against arabs or turks, directly, though yes, they made others to fight with turks or arabs or iran, like russia was made to fight against turks at crimea. But anglo saxon never did a war openly. The group which drove islam out of europe were french and spanish people, not anglo saxon or norse people. And even russians deserve a credit here, because, during the times of USSR, islam was suppressed brutally. English people never fought against islamic rule, and they cannot, and the way london city has become now, it's evident. Afghanistan has driven out entire US army, despite being backward in terms of technology. The reason for this defeat of west by islam is because, islam in reality has a tribal and feudal culture, and democratic people, sponsored by banks , with trade and mercantile interests cannot fight against islam. One needs to be brutal and tyrannical like them only. And I really don't know, why ruling class of India have kept british system intact, even today, despite trying to implement a socialist model, based on central planning style of erstwhile USSR. Nepotatus sumptibus omnium prodigorum ingenia superauit, commentus nouum balnearum usum, portentosissima genera ciborum atque cenarum, ut calidis frigidisque unguentis lauaretur, pretiosissima margarita aceto liquefacta sorberet, conuiuis ex auro panes et obsonia apponeret, aut frugi hominem esse oportere dictitans aut Caesarem. quin et nummos non mediocris summae e fastigio basilicae Iuliae per aliquot dies sparsit in plebem.
Caligula: I have existed from the morning of the world and I shall exist until the last star falls from the night. Although I have taken the form of Gaius Caligula, I am all men as I am no man and therefore I am a God.
And deep beneath the rolling waves In labyrinths of coral caves The echo of a distant time Comes willowing across the sand And everything is green and submarine And no one showed us to the land And no one knows the where's or why's
|
|
|
Post by joustos on Jan 3, 2023 22:22:03 GMT
It's OK, it does not matter. Someone's success, failures, does not depend on eye color or face, but work ethics, and discipline. Ethics is most vital, yes.
The word 'discipline' where I live actually is just a euphemism for child abuse. What most consider "work" is the appearance of genuine labor under the guise of enslaving whomsoever they can.
But the topic itself matters absolutely. The genetics paradigm reduces to eugenics, which is the most evil idea the world has ever had. It is based on the denial of the spirit, and the soulless philosophy of atheism.
Proof of the soul is here:
which inadvertently proves categorically, that genetics "science" is blatant quackery and pseudoscience of the most insidious nature.
Proof of the soul,,,,,,,,,,you say, or it says,,,,,,, Good points........ but then you say: the soul, the brain, My Body,,,,,,, These are NOT simple data of consciousness. OUR eternal problem: we REIFY experiences. Our ancestors PERSONIFIED suffered storms, fires. etc. -- hence gods.... Let's go from metaphysics to an empirical phenomenology of experiences.
|
|