|
Post by Lone Wanderer on Nov 30, 2017 16:57:39 GMT
In my opinion, it's OK if 2 persons really love each other and they are capable of managing a mixed family and they are aware of their marriage consequences due to their differences.
|
|
|
Post by Διαμονδ on Jan 20, 2018 0:53:28 GMT
What the fuck is this, racist bullshit. I refuse to believe this asshole is actually saying this 1800s era bullshit. How the fuck is this allowed? Just don't talk to him if he's a problem to you. I don't agree with manyyyy people here. But as long as no one is saying a certain race should be killed then they can be here. But having different views about marriages whether they're mixed marriages or gay marriages is ok to share your views and opinions. If people promote death to such people then that's a different thing and we remove them. Because all people and all opinions are allowed. If you support only one opinion here and forbid another, I will be offended! Despite my respect and friendship! I'm serious..
|
|
|
Post by Elizabeth on Jan 20, 2018 1:01:34 GMT
Just don't talk to him if he's a problem to you. I don't agree with manyyyy people here. But as long as no one is saying a certain race should be killed then they can be here. But having different views about marriages whether they're mixed marriages or gay marriages is ok to share your views and opinions. If people promote death to such people then that's a different thing and we remove them. Because all people and all opinions are allowed. If you support only one opinion here and forbid another, I will be offended! Despite my respect and friendship! I'm serious.. I didn't forbid either view since well free speech and all
|
|
|
Post by Διαμονδ on Jan 20, 2018 1:03:27 GMT
If you support only one opinion here and forbid another, I will be offended! Despite my respect and friendship! I'm serious.. I didn't forbid either view since well free speech and all Excellent! Just keep on the same spirit! What us not boring here you understand? ))
|
|
|
Post by Lone Wanderer on Jan 20, 2018 11:39:39 GMT
No need to attack each other. Just write your opinions.
|
|
amenemhab
Junior Member
Posts: 66
Likes: 45
Ethnicity: American
Country: USA
Region: Mountain States
Ancestry: English, Irish, German, others
Politics: Democrat
Religion: Christian
Age: 54
|
Post by amenemhab on Jan 21, 2018 11:39:39 GMT
"Hey guys! Race isn't real!" -Someone on an anthropology forum Odd that we’ve got someone on this thread calling interracial unions a “white genocide,” when roughly 1.9% of whites are contracting marriages with blacks, a figure we can expect to increase to no more than 5% in coming decades. (Note that most Hispanics are classified as white in the USA.) This is the stuff we see on the web sites of Jared Taylor or Richard Spencer, or on Takimag, which also include gay marriage under the genocide rubric, for its failure to reproduce the parents. Seems we’re in a race to make sugar-cube babies faster than the other races pump out Hershey bars, in a world where the human population explosion is driving climate change.
Yet the Supreme Court has spoken. States can’t ban interracial marriages because of Loving v. Virginia, 1967. Obergefell v. Hodges, 2015, requires states to recognize gay marriages. We’re taking government out of the bridal suite, and about high time! For young millennials in a browning America, this means that when Cupid’s Arrow strikes, they’ll have more potential partners to consider. If we intermarry enough, maybe we our kids will all be Reese’s peanut butter cups.
Although it is a social construct, defined by law in the USA for antidiscrimination and Census Bureau purposes, race is in fact real. We do have the issue of whether children of interracial marriages will be accepted by their peers at school. Bullying is a problem, sometimes severe enough to force a couple to move to a more tolerant neighborhood. But recent generations accept interracial union more readily than my generation did, and far more than the cohorts born in in the 1910s or ‘20s. Times do change; the clock never stops.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 21, 2018 15:20:22 GMT
It would be unjust to say all mixtures are bad, but most of the time, it results in their offspring's allegiance being caught between two or more races, if not the offspring being unable to fit in with either side. These people tend to incline themselves towards democratic and/or cosmopolitan agendas. Kalergi is a fine specimen of a rootless being.
Mohammed (if his last sermon is really genuine), Alice A. Bailey (a former Christian missionary), and Nikola Tesla (a brilliant genius), for instance, likewise advocated the merging of races, based on the teaching that people are of one blood i.e. Adam and Eve (Acts 17:26).
Such people think peace can come about from the dissolution of races, which appears, on the surface, as the simplest and easiest solution to nullifying prejudices. Hence why Kalergi identifies cosmopolitan democracy and revolutionary communism as forms of pacifism. But scarcely does the easy way out lead to the solution. It almost certainly leads people away from it. And as we have seen in the past 70 years, it is obviously not an easy to attain goal. What have these madmen sacrificed for these ends? The lives of millions. We have influential people like Thomas Barnett and James Warburg making their aims quite clear with their open threats.
Little known fact: Julian the Apostate spoke against race mixing in his essay against Christians. How did I arrive at this interpretation? Well, he frequently emphasizes the differences between peoples, for he believed each people had been fashioned by their own god. From Akhenaten to Tacitus, Aurelius, Renan, Meiners, Goethe, etc., the differences between races have been clearly recognized throughout history. You don't have to be a racist or a Nazi to make this fact known.
|
|
convoy
New Member
Posts: 40
Likes: 36
|
Post by convoy on Jan 21, 2018 15:56:53 GMT
"Hey guys! Race isn't real!" -Someone on an anthropology forum Odd that we’ve got someone on this thread calling interracial unions a “white genocide,” when roughly 1.9% of whites are contracting marriages with blacks, a figure we can expect to increase to no more than 5% in coming decades. (Note that most Hispanics are classified as white in the USA.) This is the stuff we see on the web sites of Jared Taylor or Richard Spencer, or on Takimag, which also include gay marriage under the genocide rubric, for its failure to reproduce the parents. Seems we’re in a race to make sugar-cube babies faster than the other races pump out Hershey bars, in a world where the human population explosion is driving climate change.
Yet the Supreme Court has spoken. States can’t ban interracial marriages because of Loving v. Virginia, 1967. Obergefell v. Hodges, 2015, requires states to recognize gay marriages. We’re taking government out of the bridal suite, and about high time! For young millennials in a browning America, this means that when Cupid’s Arrow strikes, they’ll have more potential partners to consider. If we intermarry enough, maybe we our kids will all be Reese’s peanut butter cups.
Although it is a social construct, defined by law in the USA for antidiscrimination and Census Bureau purposes, race is in fact real. We do have the issue of whether children of interracial marriages will be accepted by their peers at school. Bullying is a problem, sometimes severe enough to force a couple to move to a more tolerant neighborhood. But recent generations accept interracial union more readily than my generation did, and far more than the cohorts born in in the 1910s or ‘20s. Times do change; the clock never stops.Lmao. I say bully the heck out of them. Interracial couples are 20x more likely to end in divorce and/or heartbreak and domestic violence. The only reason interracial "unions" (fuckbuddies) are tolerated now is because you're brainwashed into tolerating it - ignoring statistics, facts, uncomfortable 'hate' facts indeed - because you're too convoluted in your own magical world of multiculturalism to face reality. 90% of White women who have kids with black men are unemployed or earn less than 10K a year. papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=262589397% of Black fathers who have children with White women are not active in their children’s lives. papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2625893"We’re taking government out of the bridal suite, and about high time!" The government's job is to govern. It's job is to protect its' people, its' culture, and its' moral dignity as a sovereign state. Therefore it IS the job of a government to interfere in marital affairs because these things directly effect our offspring and youth. I advocate for the deportation of all nonwhites from our countries, just like they did to us in South Africa. If they can do it, so can we - and tenfold. "Although it is a social construct," Are you high? "Odd that we’ve got someone on this thread calling interracial unions a “white genocide,” when roughly 1.9% of whites are contracting marriages with blacks, a figure we can expect to increase to no more than 5% in coming decades." What you're not taking into consideration - is that our birthrate (represented by reproduction strategy X) in most regions in the US are rapidly decreasing, whereas nonwhite birthrates (represented by reproduction strategy Y) continue to stay high, and in fact GROW. Strategy X - quality over quantity, whites tend to have less kids and focus on raising them effectively Strategy Y - quantity over quality, nonwhites (especially blacks) will tend to neglect their children, even impregnating multiple women over a short period of time. Look at the statistics.. According to a 2010 study, 72 percent of black children are born to unwed mothers, a sharp contrast to the 24 percent detailed in the 1965 Moynihan Report. Non-Hispanic whites 25 percent
Hispanics 42 percent
American Indian and Native Alaskans 53 percent
Non-Hispanic blacks 67 percentHonesty from the Left on Hispanic Immigration www.city-journal.org/html/honesty-left-hispanic-immigration-10467.htmlBlacks are 50% more likely to cheat on their spouses than whites; archive.is/3aVLNBlacks commit 56% of all robberies, despite being only 12% of the population. www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2013/crime-in-the-u.s.-2013/tables/table-43And 50% of all murders.. www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2013/crime-in-the-u.s.-2013/tables/table-43And you don't tell me race doesn't exist? Bull. Fucking. Shit. Let's just keep going.. I really could go forever on this topic. Mixed race kids suffer from low self-esteem, social isolation, and poor family dynamics.archive.today/o/LRe05/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1448064/I may as well start going off topic here - just to prove that other races do NOT belong here, and in fact are decreasing our living standards daily. 91.4% of refugees in America are on food stamps. cis.org/High-Cost-of-Resettling-Middle-Eastern-RefugeesCaring for one Middle Eastern refugee in America costs $64,370 over five years. cis.org/High-Cost-of-Resettling-Middle-Eastern-Refugees33% of Muslims in America believe that Sharia law is greater than the Constitution. www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/150612-CSP-Polling-Company-Nationwide-Online-Survey-of-Muslims-Topline-Poll-Data.pdfIn 2008, 80% of Somali immigration to the United States was fraudulent. www.startribune.com/new-somali-refugee-arrivals-in-minnesota-are-increasing/281197521/#162% of Canadian Muslims want Sharia law. www.torontosun.com/2011/11/01/strong-support-for-shariah-in-canadaLet's jump over the ocean to Sweden: 85% of rapists in Sweden were non-Swedish immigrants. www.gatestoneinstitute.org/5195/sweden-rape
|
|
nchsh
New Member
Posts: 18
Likes: 10
Meta-Ethnicity: Burner
Ethnicity: Slavic-American
Country: United States
Region: Pennsylvania
Ancestry: Polish-Rusyn-Slovak-Hungarian
Taxonomy: Homo Sapiens Sapiens
Y-DNA: I1-M253
mtDNA: HV9
Politics: Anarcho-Communism
Religion: Satanist (The Satanic Temple)
Relationship Status: Domestic Partnership
Hero: Robert Anton Wilson
Age: 41
|
Post by nchsh on Jan 26, 2018 16:58:41 GMT
Biologically, there's absolutely no such thing as "race," it's merely and arbitrary and vague social categorization, mostly created to justify the oppression of non-(mostly Western) Europeans. From a biological/genetic standpoint, everyone is a mixture of many different gene lines, including not only homo sapiens sapiens, but also other known and unknown hominid species. Ethnicity is also completely arbitrary, and never static. Often, cultures can't even agree on what ethnicity they are. My father's family, for example, considered themselves "Carpatho-Rusyns," while the majority of culturally, biologically, and regionally similar people considered themselves to be "Ukrainian." Both terms are almost wholly socio-political, and ultimately meaningless (other than the tensions caused by the usage of such labels). I do recognize that most people believe "race" exists, and actively reinforce those categories, so there's no point in simply denying them, regardless of how inaccurate they are. And, since it's unlikely we'll be able to dispense with those categories any time soon, I propose we simply mix as much as possible and make the whole world brown.
|
|
|
Post by Διαμονδ on Jan 26, 2018 22:51:01 GMT
Biologically, there's absolutely no such thing as "race," it's merely and arbitrary and vague social categorization, mostly created to justify the oppression of non-(mostly Western) Europeans. From a biological/genetic standpoint, everyone is a mixture of many different gene lines, including not only homo sapiens sapiens, but also other known and unknown hominid species. Ethnicity is also completely arbitrary, and never static. Often, cultures can't even agree on what ethnicity they are. My father's family, for example, considered themselves "Carpatho-Rusyns," while the majority of culturally, biologically, and regionally similar people considered themselves to be "Ukrainian." Both terms are almost wholly socio-political, and ultimately meaningless (other than the tensions caused by the usage of such labels). I do recognize that most people believe "race" exists, and actively reinforce those categories, so there's no point in simply denying them, regardless of how inaccurate they are. And, since it's unlikely we'll be able to dispense with those categories any time soon, I propose we simply mix as much as possible and make the whole world brown. Here is talk of a mixture between Negroid and Europeoid and other!
|
|
|
Post by Elizabeth on Jan 26, 2018 23:15:23 GMT
Biologically, there's absolutely no such thing as "race," it's merely and arbitrary and vague social categorization, mostly created to justify the oppression of non-(mostly Western) Europeans. From a biological/genetic standpoint, everyone is a mixture of many different gene lines, including not only homo sapiens sapiens, but also other known and unknown hominid species. Ethnicity is also completely arbitrary, and never static. Often, cultures can't even agree on what ethnicity they are. My father's family, for example, considered themselves "Carpatho-Rusyns," while the majority of culturally, biologically, and regionally similar people considered themselves to be "Ukrainian." Both terms are almost wholly socio-political, and ultimately meaningless (other than the tensions caused by the usage of such labels). I do recognize that most people believe "race" exists, and actively reinforce those categories, so there's no point in simply denying them, regardless of how inaccurate they are. And, since it's unlikely we'll be able to dispense with those categories any time soon, I propose we simply mix as much as possible and make the whole world brown. I get what you mean. This is why I say we're all same race too. As I learned in biology we only look different because of where we had lived for a long time and how much sun and other factors played a role. Just like the animals in Galapagos islands began looking different from the other animals because were isolated for a while.
|
|
convoy
New Member
Posts: 40
Likes: 36
|
Post by convoy on Jan 27, 2018 16:50:06 GMT
Biologically, there's absolutely no such thing as "race," it's merely and arbitrary and vague social categorization, mostly created to justify the oppression of non-(mostly Western) Europeans. From a biological/genetic standpoint, everyone is a mixture of many different gene lines, including not only homo sapiens sapiens, but also other known and unknown hominid species. Ethnicity is also completely arbitrary, and never static. Often, cultures can't even agree on what ethnicity they are. My father's family, for example, considered themselves "Carpatho-Rusyns," while the majority of culturally, biologically, and regionally similar people considered themselves to be "Ukrainian." Both terms are almost wholly socio-political, and ultimately meaningless (other than the tensions caused by the usage of such labels). I do recognize that most people believe "race" exists, and actively reinforce those categories, so there's no point in simply denying them, regardless of how inaccurate they are. And, since it's unlikely we'll be able to dispense with those categories any time soon, I propose we simply mix as much as possible and make the whole world brown. Did you even bother reading what I said? God damn morons.. I swear.
|
|
|
Post by Διαμονδ on Jan 27, 2018 17:13:16 GMT
Did you even bother reading what I said? God damn morons.. I swear. Everyone thinks only about his own..
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 27, 2018 17:55:01 GMT
// As I learned in biology we only look different because of where we had lived for a long time and how much sun and other factors played a role//
Heck, no. Looks like even education is controlled and desigend to promote race mixing. One's look is determined by the genetic traits, of course, parents, and their parents, and their parents. It is a recursive chain.
This is the problem with so called modern world. I don't know why people take pride in 'RACE MIXING'. I can't understand that why don't they want to resemble their grand dads, the grand daddy of their grand dads etc. The culture of tribes, all people looking similar, SYMMETRICAL FACIAL STRUCTURE, have taken a back seat.
Though, still marriage is at a personal level , I don't justify interracial marriages. Even within the same races also, I feel that they should breed with their people.
|
|
|
Post by Polaris on Jan 27, 2018 18:10:47 GMT
it is ok as long as the two of them are fully aware of the consequences and are ready to make some concessions.
|
|
amenemhab
Junior Member
Posts: 66
Likes: 45
Ethnicity: American
Country: USA
Region: Mountain States
Ancestry: English, Irish, German, others
Politics: Democrat
Religion: Christian
Age: 54
|
Post by amenemhab on Jan 30, 2018 14:13:02 GMT
It would be unjust to say all mixtures are bad, but most of the time, it results in their offspring's allegiance being caught between two or more races, if not the offspring being unable to fit in with either side. These people tend to incline themselves towards democratic and/or cosmopolitan agendas. Kalergi is a fine specimen of a rootless being. This is a problem for parents of mixed-race children. However, democratic, cosmopolitan agendas are hardly surprising, given the increasingly cosmopolitan world we have today. It’s the folks who want to maintain rigid walls between themselves and the rest of the planet who are gonna get left behind as the economy continues to globalize. Still, I think it should be the parents’ choice, and I support the right of small, isolationist nations such as Montenegro to determine their own migration, trade and marriage policies. Reformers will have to work within those countries’ systems, not try to force change from the outside.Such people [democrats] think peace can come about from the dissolution of races, which appears, on the surface, as the simplest and easiest solution to nullifying prejudices. Little known fact: Julian the Apostate spoke against race mixing in his essay against Christians. Only the naïve democrats. While I’m a Democrat, too, I’m also a realist. We’ll always find a casus belli for the next war. Dissolving the races to create a uniform, olive-skinned people would take 50 generations or more, unless intermarriages are forced by the state, a policy I’d oppose. So you need not worry; we’ll have races for quite a while. Yet no wonder Julian became an apostate. Christianity has always taken stances against racism, except in the modern chattel slavery countries where racism was folded into Christian doctrine to justify subjugation and forced labor for the slaves.From Akhenaten to Tacitus, Aurelius, Renan, Meiners, Goethe, etc., the differences between races have been clearly recognized throughout history. What was really recognized was ethnicity or political allegiance, not race per se. Egypt was a multiracial empire, with blacks and Mediterranean-type people living side by side with white Cretans, all considered Egyptian because of their loyalty to Pharaoh. Even the tiniest, most remote kingdoms had significant other-race populations, except maybe Scandinavia or the African interior.
Language and customs figure in this problem as much as skin color does, and the ancient world lacked modern race concepts based on skin color, eyes, nose or lips. Most Egyptians spoke Egyptian. Even today, language matters: We have Spanish-English issues in the USA with migration from Latin America.
The only reason interracial "unions" (fuckbuddies) are tolerated now is because you're brainwashed into tolerating it... Therefore it IS the job of a government to interfere in marital affairs... Then get your marriage agenda passed in Congress, that is, if you can. The racists are losing this fight. Everyone here laughs at Jared Taylor and Richard Spencer. Their street demonstrations draw rotten eggs thrown from the crowds of spectators. Now enjoying little political pull in the USA, racists will become pariahs in American society within 20 years at the rate things are going now.
I’ve never denied biological diversity or the role genetic factors play in race issues. These are obvious. The American black community entertains a form of racism and insularity of its own, based on how much melanin a person’s skin has. In fact, opposition to interracial marriage is stronger among blacks than among whites, perhaps because a higher proportion of blacks intermarry, causing black leaders to worry their influence will wane. Yet attitudes, law, language and custom remain the dominant factors in determining formation of racial categories.
|
|