Post by xxxxxxxxx on Jan 25, 2020 21:37:08 GMT
Abstraction is the taking of something concrete and inverting it into "nothing", while inversely taking "nothing" and inverting it into something concrete. Abstraction is instrumentally empty form with form being symbolic by nature or rather a symbol.
It is the formation and reformation of symbols, congruent by nature to chaos as the symbols are principles of the psyche by nature, that cause a polarization within the individual and collective psyche as a polarization of principles. This polarization of the psyche, hence principles, results in a cognitive dissonance where any traditional archetype is interpreted and re-interpreted into a series of further and further images thus causing a state of dissolusionment.
Where all may seem lost in the reinterpretation of basic psychic archetypes, even this fear lends itself to falsity as the divergent points of view are are still subject to a primal symbolic archetype...that being "points". The point being, not only the most universal quantitative and qualitative symbol, is also self referential in describing the nature of who assumes it considering the nature of assumption itself as grounded in emptiness of thought. It is akin to a boundless field no different than a single point that has no contrasting backdrop.
The point as a symbol represents the primordial generative nature of the mind in this context as well as the converging and diverging points of view in the respect that all assumed forms are assumed points of observation that project from one to another linearly as well as repetitively in a cycle. Under these terms the definitive nature of the point of awareness progressing to another results in a line while the repitition of these points of view necessitates a loop or rather circularity.
Hence while the formation and reformation if symbols results in chaos, this chaos is reinvented into a specific set of geometric symbols that are not only universal but inherently are unavoidable as they recommit to the basic elements of the psyche itself in how it reasons. This triad, as a set of principles and therefore abstractions, is less of a self referencing creative idol of the mind itself and more of a perpetual mode of reasoning integrated through the process of reasoning.
As such the cold abstract nature of the "principle" is rooted in how man reasons. This triad is the point of awareness, continual linear reasoning, and the repetitious cyclic pattern of assumptions that give form to identity. All of these give rise to the underlying archetype that gives birth to all other archetypes which in due course are reabsorbed back to this original archetype; it is not so much an external projection of abstractions but an internal one.
To interpret and reinterpret these symbols is to follow the linearly progressive nature of these symbols while yet always cycling back to the original primal nature. In these respects an authoritative state is mandated by all propositions alone, considering they are all variations of this base primal, hence authoritative, symbol of the psyche.
Authority is therefore grounded in a process of imitation as the replication of key psychic constants, with constructs in this case being less of an artificial or man made state of being and rather the mode through which man operates.
The continual imitation of these symbols, through further symbols, results in a state of progressive entropy into what grounds authority resulting in a dialectical game amidst the sciences, philosophies and religions as to which holds the most power. Paradoxically it is this triad, resulting in a spiral of reasoning, that makes science, philosophy and religion one and the same thing with any diversity being false and disillusioning ae they stem from these basic geometric archetypes. In the question of "authority?" a resolute "all" suffices as the answer with any regressive diatribe being negated when each is acting in accords to its specific context.
The dualism of faith and reason is thus synthesized under the blunt fact and continually propagated beleif that all is assumed; knowledge thereby taking a single solitary nature of "definition" not more, not less. Proof is thus alignment of one context to another under the symmetry of propagated variables with any act of faith being a continuum of assumption tested and retested in accords to the symmetry they produce.
The triad, in this context, points to a wholism of neither individual or group perspective being the foundation of truth, but remarkably both the individual and group with any deviation of one form from another being a deviation from the natural mode of reasoning which makes humanity human.
Authority is thus not only grounded in symbolism, which can be correlatively shown in our times with the fracturing of authority corresponding to the fracturing of language and symbols, but symbolism is authority as it is the archetype which guides the subconsciousness and the zietgeist by giving form to an unactualized mass.
In practical terms this triad necessitates a balance of authority between the self and the self, the self and the group, and the group and the group which is not seen so definitively in this age of continual polarization except by instinct or intuition alone. In simpler terms we, through authority, are responsible for ourselves and for others and vice versa. A sway to either side of the pendulum is unnatural and a symptom of the artificiality and fairness of our current age as it is focused more on reflections and images rather than the source of these reflections and images
It is the formation and reformation of symbols, congruent by nature to chaos as the symbols are principles of the psyche by nature, that cause a polarization within the individual and collective psyche as a polarization of principles. This polarization of the psyche, hence principles, results in a cognitive dissonance where any traditional archetype is interpreted and re-interpreted into a series of further and further images thus causing a state of dissolusionment.
Where all may seem lost in the reinterpretation of basic psychic archetypes, even this fear lends itself to falsity as the divergent points of view are are still subject to a primal symbolic archetype...that being "points". The point being, not only the most universal quantitative and qualitative symbol, is also self referential in describing the nature of who assumes it considering the nature of assumption itself as grounded in emptiness of thought. It is akin to a boundless field no different than a single point that has no contrasting backdrop.
The point as a symbol represents the primordial generative nature of the mind in this context as well as the converging and diverging points of view in the respect that all assumed forms are assumed points of observation that project from one to another linearly as well as repetitively in a cycle. Under these terms the definitive nature of the point of awareness progressing to another results in a line while the repitition of these points of view necessitates a loop or rather circularity.
Hence while the formation and reformation if symbols results in chaos, this chaos is reinvented into a specific set of geometric symbols that are not only universal but inherently are unavoidable as they recommit to the basic elements of the psyche itself in how it reasons. This triad, as a set of principles and therefore abstractions, is less of a self referencing creative idol of the mind itself and more of a perpetual mode of reasoning integrated through the process of reasoning.
As such the cold abstract nature of the "principle" is rooted in how man reasons. This triad is the point of awareness, continual linear reasoning, and the repetitious cyclic pattern of assumptions that give form to identity. All of these give rise to the underlying archetype that gives birth to all other archetypes which in due course are reabsorbed back to this original archetype; it is not so much an external projection of abstractions but an internal one.
To interpret and reinterpret these symbols is to follow the linearly progressive nature of these symbols while yet always cycling back to the original primal nature. In these respects an authoritative state is mandated by all propositions alone, considering they are all variations of this base primal, hence authoritative, symbol of the psyche.
Authority is therefore grounded in a process of imitation as the replication of key psychic constants, with constructs in this case being less of an artificial or man made state of being and rather the mode through which man operates.
The continual imitation of these symbols, through further symbols, results in a state of progressive entropy into what grounds authority resulting in a dialectical game amidst the sciences, philosophies and religions as to which holds the most power. Paradoxically it is this triad, resulting in a spiral of reasoning, that makes science, philosophy and religion one and the same thing with any diversity being false and disillusioning ae they stem from these basic geometric archetypes. In the question of "authority?" a resolute "all" suffices as the answer with any regressive diatribe being negated when each is acting in accords to its specific context.
The dualism of faith and reason is thus synthesized under the blunt fact and continually propagated beleif that all is assumed; knowledge thereby taking a single solitary nature of "definition" not more, not less. Proof is thus alignment of one context to another under the symmetry of propagated variables with any act of faith being a continuum of assumption tested and retested in accords to the symmetry they produce.
The triad, in this context, points to a wholism of neither individual or group perspective being the foundation of truth, but remarkably both the individual and group with any deviation of one form from another being a deviation from the natural mode of reasoning which makes humanity human.
Authority is thus not only grounded in symbolism, which can be correlatively shown in our times with the fracturing of authority corresponding to the fracturing of language and symbols, but symbolism is authority as it is the archetype which guides the subconsciousness and the zietgeist by giving form to an unactualized mass.
In practical terms this triad necessitates a balance of authority between the self and the self, the self and the group, and the group and the group which is not seen so definitively in this age of continual polarization except by instinct or intuition alone. In simpler terms we, through authority, are responsible for ourselves and for others and vice versa. A sway to either side of the pendulum is unnatural and a symptom of the artificiality and fairness of our current age as it is focused more on reflections and images rather than the source of these reflections and images