|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Jan 20, 2020 21:36:14 GMT
All truths are simultaneously true and false dependent upon context, thus making all truth as a matter of symmetry between contexts as the recursion of variables. For example, a square and triangle may differ but unite through the common limit of the line as a set of forms.
|
|
|
|
Post by Calliope on Jan 21, 2020 9:17:28 GMT
Every truth is, in essence, assimetric, because resides in the becoming truth, of the becoming of truth. And the becoming, and the becoming truth, relies on assimetries of discourse. It's clear to me because in Brazil we have Euclides da Cunha, a jornalist who writes the geographical history of a religious revolution. We sense the geographical accidents of language in his writing, we sense the assimetries of truth in becoming. It's very clear to me that the assimetries of a modal system of through makes every truth of discourse perfectly evident. Is in assimetry that truth becomes evident.
|
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Jan 21, 2020 16:31:24 GMT
Every truth is, in essence, assimetric, because resides in the becoming truth, of the becoming of truth. And the becoming, and the becoming truth, relies on assimetries of discourse. It's clear to me because in Brazil we have Euclides da Cunha, a jornalist who writes the geographical history of a religious revolution. We sense the geographical accidents of language in his writing, we sense the assimetries of truth in becoming. It's very clear to me that the assimetries of a modal system of through makes every truth of discourse perfectly evident. Is in assimetry that truth becomes evident. 1 is a state of dynamic change; it composed of alternating proportional sets that approach towards zero and from point zero, each are inversely proportional. (N-->0)+(N<--0)= 1 As such all numbers, as composed of one, are composed of infinite sets of numbers. |
|
