|
Post by Lone Wanderer on Dec 22, 2019 14:25:18 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Dec 25, 2019 20:24:03 GMT
Ha... clever. Nuff said.
|
|
|
Post by jonbain on Dec 26, 2019 20:59:54 GMT
Enforced medication enables corruption and quackery. The war on drugs is proof enough that govt cannot be trusted to be honest with its interpretation of what it alleges to be the scientific method.
The sheer pseudo-science of Einstein is categorical proof that academia is a farce.
And, the utter insanity of homosexual marriage shows us that given half a chance, the legal system will perpetuate lies for the sake of easy quick profit.
Physics and Psychology are easy to comprehend in comparison to biology. That is why freedom of choice is so vital in the much more complex world of medicine.
|
|
|
Post by Elizabeth on Jan 3, 2020 6:46:20 GMT
I'm anti vaccines. You must go natural to have real health.
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Jan 17, 2020 21:46:08 GMT
I'm anti vaccines. You must go natural to have real health. This position seems to be very healthy. Although, it's not so easy to separate what we usually call 'vaccines' from 'food'. The draw line between them is in chemistry. Cooking demonstrates us that we need to use some chemistry to get our vegetables, fruits, and - for some cases - (dead) animals be prepared in the right way. Also, such ingredients as mushrooms (fungies?) is needed to be check on if it's delicious or not. Chemistry helps us here, but it helps us with inventing some medical herbs, by mixing it for instance, or by extracting it. The sunflower oil or kinda is needed to be extract for more accuracy and more sure and trusty results. I think even this examples can show that the draw line between them isn't so great. Moreover, such medicine as penicillin absolutely necessary to be grown for the people's health sake. The results of Alexander Fleming proved that. I mean it's rather important to know how each medicine works (many of us don't acquainted with it), than to refuse it.
|
|
KGrim
Full Member
Coming back to Arktos...for a little while anyways...just to see how things are doing.
Posts: 442
Likes: 238
Country: USA
Region: South East
Location: East Texas
Ancestry: Scotch-Irish
Politics: Conservative
Religion: Eastern Orthodox
Hero: Jesus
Age: 33 soon to be 34
Philosophy: Hesychasm
|
Post by KGrim on Jan 20, 2020 20:45:32 GMT
I don't know what to believe about Vaccines. I have an inclination to be against them because I read some Anti-Vaccine material, but I don't know the full story.
|
|
|
Post by Elizabeth on Jan 20, 2020 20:47:09 GMT
I'm anti vaccines. You must go natural to have real health. This position seems to be very healthy. Although, it's not so easy to separate what we usually call 'vaccines' from 'food'. The draw line between them is in chemistry. Cooking demonstrates us that we need to use some chemistry to get our vegetables, fruits, and - for some cases - (dead) animals be prepared in the right way. Also, such ingredients as mushrooms (fungies?) is needed to be check on if it's delicious or not. Chemistry helps us here, but it helps us with inventing some medical herbs, by mixing it for instance, or by extracting it. The sunflower oil or kinda is needed to be extract for more accuracy and more sure and trusty results. I think even this examples can show that the draw line between them isn't so great. Moreover, such medicine as penicillin absolutely necessary to be grown for the people's health sake. The results of Alexander Fleming proved that. I mean it's rather important to know how each medicine works (many of us don't acquainted with it), than to refuse it. Well, with food we need it daily underwise we will be malnourished and then die. Water even more so. But vaccines are not like food because you don't need a vaccine for breakfast, lunch, and dinner. It'll probably kill you if you take vaccines like food. Just like drugs for medicine purposes. You should only take when sick and only take the right dosage or else you'll just overdose or whatever and die too. But people also don't have to take medicine to live. Like sometimes I take medicine for a cold and sometimes I don't. Some people prefer herbal healing over medicine even which has its own benefits. But the less you actually take that's foreign to your body the better. Like xrays provide things for doctors to learn about us and for them to know how they can help us. But xrays have radiation and it can kill us. So technically, the most healthiest choice there is to never do xrays or be exposed to radiation. And anyone can develop a drug addiction from the first usage and die from it.
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Jan 24, 2020 21:54:52 GMT
This position seems to be very healthy. Although, it's not so easy to separate what we usually call 'vaccines' from 'food'. The draw line between them is in chemistry. Cooking demonstrates us that we need to use some chemistry to get our vegetables, fruits, and - for some cases - (dead) animals be prepared in the right way. Also, such ingredients as mushrooms (fungies?) is needed to be check on if it's delicious or not. Chemistry helps us here, but it helps us with inventing some medical herbs, by mixing it for instance, or by extracting it. The sunflower oil or kinda is needed to be extract for more accuracy and more sure and trusty results. I think even this examples can show that the draw line between them isn't so great. Moreover, such medicine as penicillin absolutely necessary to be grown for the people's health sake. The results of Alexander Fleming proved that. I mean it's rather important to know how each medicine works (many of us don't acquainted with it), than to refuse it. Well, with food we need it daily underwise we will be malnourished and then die. Water even more so. But vaccines are not like food because you don't need a vaccine for breakfast, lunch, and dinner. It'll probably kill you if you take vaccines like food. Just like drugs for medicine purposes. You should only take when sick and only take the right dosage or else you'll just overdose or whatever and die too. But people also don't have to take medicine to live. Like sometimes I take medicine for a cold and sometimes I don't. Some people prefer herbal healing over medicine even which has its own benefits. But the less you actually take that's foreign to your body the better. Like xrays provide things for doctors to learn about us and for them to know how they can help us. But xrays have radiation and it can kill us. So technically, the most healthiest choice there is to never do xrays or be exposed to radiation. And anyone can develop a drug addiction from the first usage and die from it. Surely. These objections are completely acceptable. I just didn't mean such things, or to say I didn't want to compare pills with food. I just want to illustrate how close are they. In more brief and clear picture, it should be seen that the Earth is one, and all its elements are from the Earth. There is no food without the Earth; no rabbits can stay alive outside the Earth, or they'll be transformed; no trees could exist without the Earth's lands... and so on. This mean that the Earth is important, and each of its elements are belong to the Earth. That's why pills can be taken as some kind of food, but not food as it is. And I do agree with what you said about never visiting x-rays. (I must confess I cheated using some technical tricks to not invite x-rays procedure for three years; the yearly procedure is strongly required here in Ukraine.) Your arguments show how kind you are, and what healthy thoughts you have. This must be it. I wish it would be possible... All I know is that many scientists said that it's recommend to be done. Either we're using pills, or we'll dead. For instance, the epoch of Dark Ages reveals us all that scary diseases like plague. There were no cure, but when the medicine had stood on the feet of science everything started changing positively. Of course, I'm about to join the view that the Nature is what we're leaning for. And Heavens is not all that "taking pills constantly", but rather "drinking the purest water"... I hope the good changes is near. By the way, you might remember that about two years ago many participants of the forum had been passing the test. I don't remember what exactly the test was, but it was interesting, and it showed results as an image. And I remember that you have more "Ecologist" than "Progressivist" in your results, and also you results about society was "Family/parenting". The result of mine was more "Progressivist" than "Ecologist" that means I believe science can rebuilt our reality, or at least it can bring us all the dinosaurs, plants, animals, and the Earth in its good. I still share this view, but only if the science is taking as a tool. Every person is a scientists in his own way. One is an observer, a theoretical person. And even being "Progressivist" I understand the importance of the Nature as the source. Because it must be fair for everyone who's a progressivist that if the sources of goodness would be lost, anything would be possible.
|
|