|
Post by karl on Dec 16, 2019 23:18:52 GMT
|
|
Clovis Merovingian
Prestige/VIP
Elder
Posts: 2,673
Likes: 1,757
Meta-Ethnicity: Anglo-American
Ethnicity: Deep Southerner
Country: My State and my Region are my country
Region: The Deep South
Location: South Carolina
Ancestry: Gaelic (patrilineal), English, Ulster Scots/Scots Irish, Scottish, German, Swiss German, Swedish, Manx, Finnish, Norman French/Quebecois (distantly), Dutch (distantly)
Taxonomy: Borreby/Alpine/ Nordid mix
Y-DNA: R-S660/R-DF109
mtDNA: T1a1
Politics: Conservative
Religion: Christian
Hero: Andrew Jackson, Thomas Jefferson, James K. Polk
Age: 30
Philosophy: I try to find out what is true as best I can.
|
Post by Clovis Merovingian on Dec 17, 2019 1:27:25 GMT
Growing up, I never understood the appeal of Nazi ideology. It seemed to me to be the most puppy kickingly evil ideology on the planet. However, with the modern rise of ethnonationalism in the west I get it. The appeal is tribalism. The idea of having pride in your ancestors, your culture, your race, and your tribe, and doing only what is best for them is very appealing to people. I'm not even saying it's necessarily wrong. However, Hitler took this to an insanely evil extreme elevating the German people to being superior to others, labeling others that were not German or Germanic as subhuman, imbuing his people with destiny for the conquest of Europe and subjugation of other tribes for his thousand-year Reich and his murdering of all those he deemed as subhuman by the millions. Hitler is what happens when mankind's tribalistic impulses go too far.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 17, 2019 5:16:34 GMT
Growing up, I never understood the appeal of Nazi ideology. It seemed to me to be the most puppy kickingly evil ideology on the planet. However, with the modern rise of ethnonationalism in the west I get it. The appeal is tribalism. The idea of having pride in your ancestors, your culture, your race, and your tribe, and doing only what is best for them is very appealing to people. I'm not even saying it's necessarily wrong. However, Hitler took this to an insanely evil extreme elevating the German people to being superior to others, labeling others that were not German or Germanic as subhuman, imbuing his people with destiny for the conquest of Europe and subjugation of other tribes for his thousand-year Reich and his murdering of all those he deemed as subhuman by the millions. Hitler is what happens when mankind's tribalistic impulses go too far. Until and unless people don't realize the reality, that the father's of these people, on whom they are taking pride, the so called race, culture, which their father's brought, actually were FOREIGN INVADERS who had imposed on the native people, killed the local males, and snatch and bred with the girls.
Once they realize how they have got birth, then people like hitler will not even be heard in society.
Evolution is a dynamic state of nature, not static.
|
|
|
Post by karl on Dec 17, 2019 13:28:34 GMT
Growing up, I never understood the appeal of Nazi ideology. It seemed to me to be the most puppy kickingly evil ideology on the planet. However, with the modern rise of ethnonationalism in the west I get it. The appeal is tribalism. The idea of having pride in your ancestors, your culture, your race, and your tribe, and doing only what is best for them is very appealing to people. I'm not even saying it's necessarily wrong. However, Hitler took this to an insanely evil extreme elevating the German people to being superior to others, labeling others that were not German or Germanic as subhuman, imbuing his people with destiny for the conquest of Europe and subjugation of other tribes for his thousand-year Reich and his murdering of all those he deemed as subhuman by the millions. Hitler is what happens when mankind's tribalistic impulses go too far.
When parts of human nature is suppressed, it comes back with a vengeance. Humans typically do not evolve through choosing what they see as good options, but rather as the only options left. The most effective way to have people support a policy is to first allow them to see that the alternative fails. Germans appeared as a progressive people after WW1, and elected progressive politicians who ended up failing them. Partly because of bad policies, and partly because of bad circumstances, such as the war debt owed to France, France's occupation of the Ruhr, which had the German government print money to pay the workers who then went on strike, and the global economical crash six years later. But the collective never conducts a careful analysis of anything, and all they saw was failure, leading to a misery that had lasted for fifteen years.
This is similar to how "democracy" became a dirty word in Russia due to that it's associated with the devastation of the Russian economy caused by ultra-liberalistic policies which wiped out 50% of Russian businesses overnight, after the fall of the Soviet union. So they sought a strong leader instead, which is what Putin represents.
Human nature is complex and contradictory. Yes, we are drawn towards tribalism, but we're also drawn towards universalism. No policy could ever be successful in the long run if it doesn't cater to both. Full tribalism would only lead to internal conflicts within a society based on it. If it's based on culture, there would be purity tests on where you are in the social hierarchy based on how true you are towards what's considered as the right culture, and if it's based on ethnicity, there will be purity tests on how close you are to what's considered the genetic ideal.
My own take on it is that the devil is in the details. I do not believe that it works to just cram people under the same flag, irregardless of their collective identity, and ask them to not care about who or what they belong to. They will feel a need to belong whether that's recognised or not, and, again, if that is suppressed within them, it will come back with a vengeance. Brexit is an attempt for the British people to assert their identity, "Make America great again" is the American equivalent to it, and even in China one declares "Make China great again", believing that China is destined to be no.1 in the world.
It's very difficult to separate tribalism from the desire to feel superior to others, which is why it must be allowed some outlet in order to prevent that it starts growing in frustration over being suppressed. Therein lies the danger or the EU project, and also of how globalisation of trade has moved more and more power away from people and into the hands of amoral international companies, who are basically the ones writing these treaties.
Some will always be drawn towards nationalism, but the majority tends not to, unless the alternative fails. In this case, the existing alternative is globalism, which does look as if it's in the process of failing. What comes afterwards is anyone's guess, but it could get really ugly.
|
|
|
Post by jonbain on Dec 17, 2019 23:49:48 GMT
Reading Churchill, it was evident that after ww1, the Germans had a massive population explosion which was unsustainable. The French population then also radically increased a couple of years later. In the years to follow, German school-teachers were instructed to inflict severe corporal punishment to make those kids into hungry rabid wolves. The seeds of ww2 were planted way before the nazis were even a twinkling in Adolph's eye, and the politics of the matter was little more than a stylistic veneer. Democracy, capitalism, communism, socialism or monarchy are all superficial excuses for intellectuals to wave their hands around in the air. The coal and steel producing power-mongers of the lost German land at the end of ww1 were the real architects of that vengeance. Gelsenkirchen bergwerk-AG was the name of the puppeteers that orchestrated the affair. The Germans were just sheep; brainwashed and murdered at the behest of the coal-steel corporations. So technically, they were capitalists with a socialist cheer-leader. But that is a superficial label, and any other label would do. Adolph was a totem, a mascot, an idol for the masses to worship and fear. This free book archive.org/details/hitlerovereurope009891mbp/page/n6was printed in 1935 and described how the plan was well known in advance. I have an original copy of it. And I took the time to write the review on that link too. Having played a crucial role in the destruction of the apartheid state, I know full well how Saxon culture uses violence, fear, and ignorance to stampede people in herds. Politics is puppet-strings and its adherents are either unwitting fools or willing tools of the evil minds that tug on them. Beware the monopolies, the power which controls them is deeply subconscious. These patterns are throughout history repeated. Next...
|
|
Clovis Merovingian
Prestige/VIP
Elder
Posts: 2,673
Likes: 1,757
Meta-Ethnicity: Anglo-American
Ethnicity: Deep Southerner
Country: My State and my Region are my country
Region: The Deep South
Location: South Carolina
Ancestry: Gaelic (patrilineal), English, Ulster Scots/Scots Irish, Scottish, German, Swiss German, Swedish, Manx, Finnish, Norman French/Quebecois (distantly), Dutch (distantly)
Taxonomy: Borreby/Alpine/ Nordid mix
Y-DNA: R-S660/R-DF109
mtDNA: T1a1
Politics: Conservative
Religion: Christian
Hero: Andrew Jackson, Thomas Jefferson, James K. Polk
Age: 30
Philosophy: I try to find out what is true as best I can.
|
Post by Clovis Merovingian on Dec 18, 2019 3:12:24 GMT
jonbain What is meant by Saxon Culture? Do you mean Germanic culture in general?
|
|
Clovis Merovingian
Prestige/VIP
Elder
Posts: 2,673
Likes: 1,757
Meta-Ethnicity: Anglo-American
Ethnicity: Deep Southerner
Country: My State and my Region are my country
Region: The Deep South
Location: South Carolina
Ancestry: Gaelic (patrilineal), English, Ulster Scots/Scots Irish, Scottish, German, Swiss German, Swedish, Manx, Finnish, Norman French/Quebecois (distantly), Dutch (distantly)
Taxonomy: Borreby/Alpine/ Nordid mix
Y-DNA: R-S660/R-DF109
mtDNA: T1a1
Politics: Conservative
Religion: Christian
Hero: Andrew Jackson, Thomas Jefferson, James K. Polk
Age: 30
Philosophy: I try to find out what is true as best I can.
|
Post by Clovis Merovingian on Dec 18, 2019 3:14:31 GMT
Growing up, I never understood the appeal of Nazi ideology. It seemed to me to be the most puppy kickingly evil ideology on the planet. However, with the modern rise of ethnonationalism in the west I get it. The appeal is tribalism. The idea of having pride in your ancestors, your culture, your race, and your tribe, and doing only what is best for them is very appealing to people. I'm not even saying it's necessarily wrong. However, Hitler took this to an insanely evil extreme elevating the German people to being superior to others, labeling others that were not German or Germanic as subhuman, imbuing his people with destiny for the conquest of Europe and subjugation of other tribes for his thousand-year Reich and his murdering of all those he deemed as subhuman by the millions. Hitler is what happens when mankind's tribalistic impulses go too far. Until and unless people don't realize the reality, that the father's of these people, on whom they are taking pride, the so called race, culture, which their father's brought, actually were FOREIGN INVADERS who had imposed on the native people, killed the local males, and snatch and bred with the girls.
Once they realize how they have got birth, then people like hitler will not even be heard in society.
Evolution is a dynamic state of nature, not static.
I think that Hitler and the Nazis actually identified with their foreign invaders from Scandinavia who brought Germanic culture to what is modern day Germany. That's why they believed Nordic people to be the master race.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 18, 2019 12:12:00 GMT
Until and unless people don't realize the reality, that the father's of these people, on whom they are taking pride, the so called race, culture, which their father's brought, actually were FOREIGN INVADERS who had imposed on the native people, killed the local males, and snatch and bred with the girls.
Once they realize how they have got birth, then people like hitler will not even be heard in society.
Evolution is a dynamic state of nature, not static.
I think that Hitler and the Nazis actually identified with their foreign invaders from Scandinavia who brought Germanic culture to what is modern day Germany. That's why they believed Nordic people to be the master race. As per sagas of Snorri, those people came from Asia Minor, after the Trojan War.
The Prologue is the first section of four books of the Edda, consisting of an euhemerized Christian account of the origins of Nordic mythology: the Nordic gods are described as human Trojan warriors who left Troy after the fall of that city (an origin similar to the one chosen by Geoffrey of Monmouth in the 12th century to account for the ancestry of the British nation, and which parallels Virgil's Aeneid). According to Edda, these warriors settled in northern Europe, where they were accepted as divine kings because of their superior culture and technology.
The accounts of thor is this , and aesir were men of asia, central asian people. Some people, who controlled the regions of Central Asia, designated themselves as Aryans, before their invasion of the northwest frontier provinces and upper regions of the indus.
The prologue to the Prose Edda euhemerises Thor as a prince of Troy, and the son of king Memnon by Troana, a daughter of Priam. Thor, also known as Tror, is said to have married the prophetess Sibyl (identified with Sif). Thor is further said here to have been raised in Thrace by a chieftain named Lorikus, whom he later slew to assume the title of "King of Thrace", to have had hair "fairer than gold", and to have been strong enough to lift ten bearskins.
The name of the æsir is explained as "men from Asia", Asgard being the "Asian city" (i.e., Troy). Alternatively, Troy is in Tyrkland (Turkey, i.e., Asia Minor), and Asialand is Scythia, where Thor founded a new city named Asgard. Odin is a remote descendant of Thor, removed by twelve generations, who led an expedition across Germany, Denmark and Sweden to Norway.
|
|
|
Post by jonbain on Dec 21, 2019 21:40:43 GMT
jonbain What is meant by Saxon Culture? Do you mean Germanic culture in general? There are no precise lines between the words we use: 'culture', 'Germanic', 'Saxon'. We can look through the mists of time to when the Saxons pushed the Briton's out of England, and see how their narratives are increasingly designed to undermine liberty. I believe that the Celts invited the Vikings to rectify things. So if you include Vikings as Germanic, then that is not what I mean by Saxon. But in society today there are two primal forces of mind that seem locked in a struggle that echos through the ages and throughout the world. In any family you will find those that seek to dominate, those that seek liberty. This is not a racial distinction, but a cultural one: a choice. The prime means of Saxon culture is hierarchical monetization: by owning the financial-legal monopoly they indirectly own all those that adhere to the fears which they generate; often through populist lies which ostracize minorities of awareness by overpowering them with mobs of ignorance. Who are 'they'? Their brainwashing uses superficial and arbitrary "uniformity of appearance" to coerce the population into mindless subservience; so 'they' are the little semi-invisible grey men of the banks, with their compulsive piss-pot hairstyles and fashion fascism, shiny black shoes, and silk nooses around their necks. Their minions are the school-teachers, bureaucrats and other jingoists; propaganda bleating lackeys, doctors, and simply anybody who gathers money by lies. Easily identified by their lack of aesthetics and cowardly retentive style. Is it clear now?
|
|
Clovis Merovingian
Prestige/VIP
Elder
Posts: 2,673
Likes: 1,757
Meta-Ethnicity: Anglo-American
Ethnicity: Deep Southerner
Country: My State and my Region are my country
Region: The Deep South
Location: South Carolina
Ancestry: Gaelic (patrilineal), English, Ulster Scots/Scots Irish, Scottish, German, Swiss German, Swedish, Manx, Finnish, Norman French/Quebecois (distantly), Dutch (distantly)
Taxonomy: Borreby/Alpine/ Nordid mix
Y-DNA: R-S660/R-DF109
mtDNA: T1a1
Politics: Conservative
Religion: Christian
Hero: Andrew Jackson, Thomas Jefferson, James K. Polk
Age: 30
Philosophy: I try to find out what is true as best I can.
|
Post by Clovis Merovingian on Dec 22, 2019 20:11:48 GMT
jonbain What is meant by Saxon Culture? Do you mean Germanic culture in general? There are no precise lines between the words we use: 'culture', 'Germanic', 'Saxon'. We can look through the mists of time to when the Saxons pushed the Briton's out of England, and see how their narratives are increasingly designed to undermine liberty. I believe that the Celts invited the Vikings to rectify things. So if you include Vikings as Germanic, then that is not what I mean by Saxon. But in society today there are two primal forces of mind that seem locked in a struggle that echos through the ages and throughout the world. In any family you will find those that seek to dominate, those that seek liberty. This is not a racial distinction, but a cultural one: a choice. The prime means of Saxon culture is hierarchical monetization: by owning the financial-legal monopoly they indirectly own all those that adhere to the fears which they generate; often through populist lies which ostracize minorities of awareness by overpowering them with mobs of ignorance. Who are 'they'? Their brainwashing uses superficial and arbitrary "uniformity of appearance" to coerce the population into mindless subservience; so 'they' are the little semi-invisible grey men of the banks, with their compulsive piss-pot hairstyles and fashion fascism, shiny black shoes, and silk nooses around their necks. Their minions are the school-teachers, bureaucrats and other jingoists; propaganda bleating lackeys, doctors, and simply anybody who gathers money by lies. Easily identified by their lack of aesthetics and cowardly retentive style. Is it clear now? Yes, it's clear. I'm only confused about why you're linking it to the Saxons.
|
|
Clovis Merovingian
Prestige/VIP
Elder
Posts: 2,673
Likes: 1,757
Meta-Ethnicity: Anglo-American
Ethnicity: Deep Southerner
Country: My State and my Region are my country
Region: The Deep South
Location: South Carolina
Ancestry: Gaelic (patrilineal), English, Ulster Scots/Scots Irish, Scottish, German, Swiss German, Swedish, Manx, Finnish, Norman French/Quebecois (distantly), Dutch (distantly)
Taxonomy: Borreby/Alpine/ Nordid mix
Y-DNA: R-S660/R-DF109
mtDNA: T1a1
Politics: Conservative
Religion: Christian
Hero: Andrew Jackson, Thomas Jefferson, James K. Polk
Age: 30
Philosophy: I try to find out what is true as best I can.
|
Post by Clovis Merovingian on Jan 7, 2020 0:57:47 GMT
I think that Hitler and the Nazis actually identified with their foreign invaders from Scandinavia who brought Germanic culture to what is modern day Germany. That's why they believed Nordic people to be the master race. As per sagas of Snorri, those people came from Asia Minor, after the Trojan War.
The Prologue is the first section of four books of the Edda, consisting of an euhemerized Christian account of the origins of Nordic mythology: the Nordic gods are described as human Trojan warriors who left Troy after the fall of that city (an origin similar to the one chosen by Geoffrey of Monmouth in the 12th century to account for the ancestry of the British nation, and which parallels Virgil's Aeneid). According to Edda, these warriors settled in northern Europe, where they were accepted as divine kings because of their superior culture and technology.
The accounts of thor is this , and aesir were men of asia, central asian people. Some people, who controlled the regions of Central Asia, designated themselves as Aryans, before their invasion of the northwest frontier provinces and upper regions of the indus.
The prologue to the Prose Edda euhemerises Thor as a prince of Troy, and the son of king Memnon by Troana, a daughter of Priam. Thor, also known as Tror, is said to have married the prophetess Sibyl (identified with Sif). Thor is further said here to have been raised in Thrace by a chieftain named Lorikus, whom he later slew to assume the title of "King of Thrace", to have had hair "fairer than gold", and to have been strong enough to lift ten bearskins.
The name of the æsir is explained as "men from Asia", Asgard being the "Asian city" (i.e., Troy). Alternatively, Troy is in Tyrkland (Turkey, i.e., Asia Minor), and Asialand is Scythia, where Thor founded a new city named Asgard. Odin is a remote descendant of Thor, removed by twelve generations, who led an expedition across Germany, Denmark and Sweden to Norway.
The thing about Snorri's Prose Edda was that is was a reaction to Scandinavians starting to adopt chivalric romance stories from continental Europe instead of reading and writing literature from their own traditions (the sagas, Norse myth etc.) The problem with Scandinavian traditions are that they are rooted in pagan mythology and in the Middle Ages the pagan gods were seen as demons. Snorri in giving the gods of Germanic myth an origin as Trojan/Central ages kings who were so great that they later became gods was a tool to give the gods a more noble origin than being demons. As I understand it the haplogroup most found in Scandinavia is I1 which is of pre indo european origin. I think that when push comes to shoves where a person stands ethnically is their culture, customs, and traditions rather than ancestry as it is culture that separates one people from another on the group level in the most fundamental way. Obviously someone needs to respect, study, and love their ancestors and their culture and there is a large genetic component to culture but I think when all is said and done, one's identity is with their own culture.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 7, 2020 11:47:42 GMT
As per sagas of Snorri, those people came from Asia Minor, after the Trojan War.
The Prologue is the first section of four books of the Edda, consisting of an euhemerized Christian account of the origins of Nordic mythology: the Nordic gods are described as human Trojan warriors who left Troy after the fall of that city (an origin similar to the one chosen by Geoffrey of Monmouth in the 12th century to account for the ancestry of the British nation, and which parallels Virgil's Aeneid). According to Edda, these warriors settled in northern Europe, where they were accepted as divine kings because of their superior culture and technology.
The accounts of thor is this , and aesir were men of asia, central asian people. Some people, who controlled the regions of Central Asia, designated themselves as Aryans, before their invasion of the northwest frontier provinces and upper regions of the indus.
The prologue to the Prose Edda euhemerises Thor as a prince of Troy, and the son of king Memnon by Troana, a daughter of Priam. Thor, also known as Tror, is said to have married the prophetess Sibyl (identified with Sif). Thor is further said here to have been raised in Thrace by a chieftain named Lorikus, whom he later slew to assume the title of "King of Thrace", to have had hair "fairer than gold", and to have been strong enough to lift ten bearskins.
The name of the æsir is explained as "men from Asia", Asgard being the "Asian city" (i.e., Troy). Alternatively, Troy is in Tyrkland (Turkey, i.e., Asia Minor), and Asialand is Scythia, where Thor founded a new city named Asgard. Odin is a remote descendant of Thor, removed by twelve generations, who led an expedition across Germany, Denmark and Sweden to Norway.
The thing about Snorri's Prose Edda was that is was a reaction to Scandinavians starting to adopt chivalric romance stories from continental Europe instead of reading and writing literature from their own traditions (the sagas, Norse myth etc.) The problem with Scandinavian traditions are that they are rooted in pagan mythology and in the Middle Ages the pagan gods were seen as demons. Snorri in giving the gods of Germanic myth an origin as Trojan/Central ages kings who were so great that they later became gods was a tool to give the gods a more noble origin than being demons. As I understand it the haplogroup most found in Scandinavia is I1 which is of pre indo european origin. I think that when push comes to shoves where a person stands ethnically is their culture, customs, and traditions rather than ancestry as it is culture that separates one people from another on the group level in the most fundamental way. Obviously someone needs to respect, study, and love their ancestors and their culture and there is a large genetic component to culture but I think when all is said and done, one's identity is with their own culture.
This DNA is from Chalcolithic europe, which is actually YAMNAYA STEPPE people.
That's the site of asia minor from where Thor had founded asgard, and odin was remote descendant of thor, who led an expedition across the nordic regions.
In 2007, it was suggested that it initially dispersed from the area that is now Denmark.[9].
If you want more information on this, then search of Ynglinga Sagas.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 8, 2020 6:36:34 GMT
jonbain What is meant by Saxon Culture? Do you mean Germanic culture in general? There are no precise lines between the words we use: 'culture', 'Germanic', 'Saxon'. We can look through the mists of time to when the Saxons pushed the Briton's out of England, and see how their narratives are increasingly designed to undermine liberty. I believe that the Celts invited the Vikings to rectify things.So if you include Vikings as Germanic, then that is not what I mean by Saxon. But in society today there are two primal forces of mind that seem locked in a struggle that echos through the ages and throughout the world. In any family you will find those that seek to dominate, those that seek liberty. This is not a racial distinction, but a cultural one: a choice. The prime means of Saxon culture is hierarchical monetization: by owning the financial-legal monopoly they indirectly own all those that adhere to the fears which they generate; often through populist lies which ostracize minorities of awareness by overpowering them with mobs of ignorance. Who are 'they'? Their brainwashing uses superficial and arbitrary "uniformity of appearance" to coerce the population into mindless subservience; so 'they' are the little semi-invisible grey men of the banks, with their compulsive piss-pot hairstyles and fashion fascism, shiny black shoes, and silk nooses around their necks. Their minions are the school-teachers, bureaucrats and other jingoists; propaganda bleating lackeys, doctors, and simply anybody who gathers money by lies. Easily identified by their lack of aesthetics and cowardly retentive style. Is it clear now?
Only the TEUTONIC KNIGHTS were real ANGLO SAXONS people, who came out of Germany, and east of anglia, and established themselves at THE NOR FOLK.
Before their conversion to christianity, TEUTONIC KNIGHTS were pagans, and had derived their ancestry from ODIN.
I think most of these british are mix, more or less now, who went with the colonialism.
|
|
Clovis Merovingian
Prestige/VIP
Elder
Posts: 2,673
Likes: 1,757
Meta-Ethnicity: Anglo-American
Ethnicity: Deep Southerner
Country: My State and my Region are my country
Region: The Deep South
Location: South Carolina
Ancestry: Gaelic (patrilineal), English, Ulster Scots/Scots Irish, Scottish, German, Swiss German, Swedish, Manx, Finnish, Norman French/Quebecois (distantly), Dutch (distantly)
Taxonomy: Borreby/Alpine/ Nordid mix
Y-DNA: R-S660/R-DF109
mtDNA: T1a1
Politics: Conservative
Religion: Christian
Hero: Andrew Jackson, Thomas Jefferson, James K. Polk
Age: 30
Philosophy: I try to find out what is true as best I can.
|
Post by Clovis Merovingian on Jan 8, 2020 7:02:35 GMT
There are no precise lines between the words we use: 'culture', 'Germanic', 'Saxon'. We can look through the mists of time to when the Saxons pushed the Briton's out of England, and see how their narratives are increasingly designed to undermine liberty. I believe that the Celts invited the Vikings to rectify things.So if you include Vikings as Germanic, then that is not what I mean by Saxon. But in society today there are two primal forces of mind that seem locked in a struggle that echos through the ages and throughout the world. In any family you will find those that seek to dominate, those that seek liberty. This is not a racial distinction, but a cultural one: a choice. The prime means of Saxon culture is hierarchical monetization: by owning the financial-legal monopoly they indirectly own all those that adhere to the fears which they generate; often through populist lies which ostracize minorities of awareness by overpowering them with mobs of ignorance. Who are 'they'? Their brainwashing uses superficial and arbitrary "uniformity of appearance" to coerce the population into mindless subservience; so 'they' are the little semi-invisible grey men of the banks, with their compulsive piss-pot hairstyles and fashion fascism, shiny black shoes, and silk nooses around their necks. Their minions are the school-teachers, bureaucrats and other jingoists; propaganda bleating lackeys, doctors, and simply anybody who gathers money by lies. Easily identified by their lack of aesthetics and cowardly retentive style. Is it clear now?
Only the TEUTONIC KNIGHTS were real ANGLO SAXONS people, who came out of Germany, and east of anglia, and established themselves at THE NOR FOLK.
Before their conversion to christianity, TEUTONIC KNIGHTS were pagans, and had derived their ancestry from ODIN.
I think most of these british are mix, more or less now, who went with the colonialism.
The Frisians in the Northern Netherlands and Germany are the purist genetic descendants of the Anglo Saxons. The old Frisians because of flooding had abandoned the area of Frisia and the people who resettled the area were Angles, Jutes, and Saxons becoming modern Frisians and they even speak a language close to old English today. In appearance they are very Nordic unlike the English who are shorter and darker in features usually. Studies have shown that modern English people are more or less one third Anglo Saxon with the exact percentage being 38%. The rest of the people in the British Isles have a lot of Anglo Saxon blood too but it is lower at 30%. There also seems to be an east west gradient with the more eastern parts of England having a lot of Anglo Saxon blood and the more western parts having more Celtic blood. However terms like Celtic, Germanic, and Anglo Saxon are really more cultural terms rather than genetic as by a genetic definition the only real Germanic people would be Scandinavians and the only real Celts would be Austrians where these cultures originated. The original Celts and Germanics spread from their homeland, conquered other cultures, mixed into them, and imposed their culture upon them creating the various ethnic groups of Europe. The English are culturally Anglo Saxon and that is what makes them ethnically Anglo Saxon as well.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 8, 2020 7:05:02 GMT
Only the TEUTONIC KNIGHTS were real ANGLO SAXONS people, who came out of Germany, and east of anglia, and established themselves at THE NOR FOLK.
Before their conversion to christianity, TEUTONIC KNIGHTS were pagans, and had derived their ancestry from ODIN.
I think most of these british are mix, more or less now, who went with the colonialism.
The Frisians in the Northern Netherlands and Germany are the purist genetic descendants of the Anglo Saxons. The old Frisians because of flooding had abandoned the area of Frisia and the people who resettled the area were Angles, Jutes, and Saxons becoming modern Frisians and they even speak a language close to old English today. In appearance they are very Nordic unlike the English who are shorter and darker in features usually. Studies have shown that modern English people are more or less one third Anglo Saxon with the exact percentage being 38%. The rest of the people in the British Isles have a lot of Anglo Saxon blood too but it is lower at 30%. There also seems to be an east west gradient with the more eastern parts of England having a lot of Anglo Saxon blood and the more western parts having more Celtic blood. However terms like Celtic, Germanic, and Anglo Saxon are really more cultural terms rather than genetic as by a genetic definition the only real Germanic people would be Scandinavians and the only real Celts would be Austrians where these cultures originated. The original Celts and Germanics spread from their homeland, conquered other cultures, mixed into them, and imposed their culture upon them creating the various ethnic groups of Europe. The English are culturally Anglo Saxon and that is what makes them ethnically Anglo Saxon as well.
Yes, FRISSIAN are people who have ancestry from THRACIAN INDO EUROPEANS.
And the english lords were pushing these people into slavery, like african mine, VAN DE KAAP types.
reason for the war between dutch afrikanner and british
|
|