Post by xxxxxxxxx on Oct 9, 2019 7:01:34 GMT
Quadratic Negation or Quadratic Voiding in a circular means of logic where a premise is taken and through a fourfold negation/voiding multiple propositions are manifested leading to such a complexity that the original premise is annihilate through a multitude of following premises rendering it "desolate".
The premise (x) is observed as a context in an of itself and is purely assumed. It can be any assumption such as "color", "blue", "hearing", "cow", etc.
For this example "Good" will be applied as an assumption: (G)
The first voiding is grounded in a doubling, similar to the negation of negation in intuitionist logic, except that thus "doubling" results in an inherent tension within the propostion where its self imposed opposition results in an inherent middle antithetical term to the split thetical term.
This "split" thetical term results in the thesis existing in grades where each grade results in a progressive seperation. It can be observed a dualism of dualisms or the halving of halving:
1. The Goodness of Good projects Absence of Good as Evil
((G)G) --> (-G <----> E)
2. Evilest of Evils projects Absence of Evil as Good
((E)E) --> (-E <----> G)
Or
((-G)-G) --> (--G)
***Points 1 can be observed as the bluest of blues necessitating certain not blues exist as one blue is bluer than another as many blues. One general replicated into another general results in a particular.
Point 2 observes not bluest of blues as necessitating one general blue as a particular.
3. The Goodness of Evil projects as a fragmentation of Good and Evil in to Various Grades of Good
((G)-G) --> ((-G)X)
*** A more empirical version would be the blueness of not blue as various grades of blue grades where "x" observes a range of variables colors such as red, orange, etc mixed with Blue. Thus "blue" as a particulate is magnified into multiple further particulate states.
((B)-B) --> ((B)X)
4. The Evilest Good as a fragmentation of Evil and Good into further evils.
((-G)G) --> ((-G)X)
*** This can be observed as not blueness of blue resulting into further not blues. Thus "not blue" as a particulate state is manifested into further particulates.
This fourfold negating is takes a general and turns it to a particular with these particular manifesting into further particulars in different respects. A thesis of a thesis results in an antithesis thus is negation of Hegelian dialectic in one respect, while observing an inversion of intuitionist logics double negation as double positives.
This Desolation Logic is about the magnification of assumptions into a mass of continual assumptions that effectively turns the original assumption into an empty formless mass of assumptions that have no rationality (ie ratios).
It is fallacy inducing by nature and can be considered as the inversion of a valid or sound assumption/premise into a fallacy where a thesis is reduced to its antithesis continually thus creating deeper degrees of uncertainty through the production of complexity.
The premise (x) is observed as a context in an of itself and is purely assumed. It can be any assumption such as "color", "blue", "hearing", "cow", etc.
For this example "Good" will be applied as an assumption: (G)
The first voiding is grounded in a doubling, similar to the negation of negation in intuitionist logic, except that thus "doubling" results in an inherent tension within the propostion where its self imposed opposition results in an inherent middle antithetical term to the split thetical term.
This "split" thetical term results in the thesis existing in grades where each grade results in a progressive seperation. It can be observed a dualism of dualisms or the halving of halving:
1. The Goodness of Good projects Absence of Good as Evil
((G)G) --> (-G <----> E)
2. Evilest of Evils projects Absence of Evil as Good
((E)E) --> (-E <----> G)
Or
((-G)-G) --> (--G)
***Points 1 can be observed as the bluest of blues necessitating certain not blues exist as one blue is bluer than another as many blues. One general replicated into another general results in a particular.
Point 2 observes not bluest of blues as necessitating one general blue as a particular.
3. The Goodness of Evil projects as a fragmentation of Good and Evil in to Various Grades of Good
((G)-G) --> ((-G)X)
*** A more empirical version would be the blueness of not blue as various grades of blue grades where "x" observes a range of variables colors such as red, orange, etc mixed with Blue. Thus "blue" as a particulate is magnified into multiple further particulate states.
((B)-B) --> ((B)X)
4. The Evilest Good as a fragmentation of Evil and Good into further evils.
((-G)G) --> ((-G)X)
*** This can be observed as not blueness of blue resulting into further not blues. Thus "not blue" as a particulate state is manifested into further particulates.
This fourfold negating is takes a general and turns it to a particular with these particular manifesting into further particulars in different respects. A thesis of a thesis results in an antithesis thus is negation of Hegelian dialectic in one respect, while observing an inversion of intuitionist logics double negation as double positives.
This Desolation Logic is about the magnification of assumptions into a mass of continual assumptions that effectively turns the original assumption into an empty formless mass of assumptions that have no rationality (ie ratios).
It is fallacy inducing by nature and can be considered as the inversion of a valid or sound assumption/premise into a fallacy where a thesis is reduced to its antithesis continually thus creating deeper degrees of uncertainty through the production of complexity.