Post by xxxxxxxxx on Oct 4, 2019 17:59:26 GMT
Sets are a revolving context of symbols which invert to further symbols as sets.
1. The hindu number system, our modern means of numbers, used 10 different symbols to create an infinite number spectrum.
2. All logic and math is grounded in key symbols which invert to different variations of the original symbols through a change in how the number is repeated.
3. It is this reptition of the symbol (ie: 1, 11, 1211, 13171...) and how it inverts to another symbol (ex: 1 -> 2 = (1,2 and 12), 3 -> 7 = (3,7 and 37), 34 -> 35 = (34,35 and 3435) that determines how we count phenomenon.
4. These symbols are thus rooted in key grounding symbols that exist through a perpetual variation. Each set of symbols thus revolves through other symbols to create new ones. This reptition necessitates all counting and spelling as a form of "looping" key symbols necessitating the basic elements of logic and math itself are grounded in a fallacy of circularity.
5. These core symbols, the standard 11 core numbers of Hinduism (as "0" can be counted as a number) for example, effectively are all empty of meaning in and of themselves and gain this "meaning" through a 4 fold looping:
1. A looping where one number leads to another number as that number looping itself.
2. A looping where each number, as a loop of a prior number, loop through eachother as a new number
3. A looping where one number as leading to another number, as a variation of the original number, goes from one number to many numbers back to one number again.
Example: 1 goes to 2 as 1 and 1. 1 is one number 2 is one number, 1 and 1 are many numbers.
4. A looping where many numbers lead to one number than many numbers.
Example: 1 and 2 lead to 3 with 3 and 1 leading to 4 and 3 and 2 leading to 5. 1 and 2 are multiple numbers leading to one number of 3. 3 as singular number loops back to 1 and 2, as many numbers, again resulting in singular numbers for each respective loop.
5. This one and many, grounded in the looping of symbols, reflects a basic odd (singular) and even (many) approach where counting is grounded in self referential loop in which all numbers are the counting of prior numbers and all letters are spelling through other letters (basic pronunciation of any letter necessitates an inherent spelling of that letter).
6. Counting and spelling as subject to looping and equivocation are thus fallacious by nature.
****The same occurs respectively for linguistic symbols of course.
1. The hindu number system, our modern means of numbers, used 10 different symbols to create an infinite number spectrum.
2. All logic and math is grounded in key symbols which invert to different variations of the original symbols through a change in how the number is repeated.
3. It is this reptition of the symbol (ie: 1, 11, 1211, 13171...) and how it inverts to another symbol (ex: 1 -> 2 = (1,2 and 12), 3 -> 7 = (3,7 and 37), 34 -> 35 = (34,35 and 3435) that determines how we count phenomenon.
4. These symbols are thus rooted in key grounding symbols that exist through a perpetual variation. Each set of symbols thus revolves through other symbols to create new ones. This reptition necessitates all counting and spelling as a form of "looping" key symbols necessitating the basic elements of logic and math itself are grounded in a fallacy of circularity.
5. These core symbols, the standard 11 core numbers of Hinduism (as "0" can be counted as a number) for example, effectively are all empty of meaning in and of themselves and gain this "meaning" through a 4 fold looping:
1. A looping where one number leads to another number as that number looping itself.
2. A looping where each number, as a loop of a prior number, loop through eachother as a new number
3. A looping where one number as leading to another number, as a variation of the original number, goes from one number to many numbers back to one number again.
Example: 1 goes to 2 as 1 and 1. 1 is one number 2 is one number, 1 and 1 are many numbers.
4. A looping where many numbers lead to one number than many numbers.
Example: 1 and 2 lead to 3 with 3 and 1 leading to 4 and 3 and 2 leading to 5. 1 and 2 are multiple numbers leading to one number of 3. 3 as singular number loops back to 1 and 2, as many numbers, again resulting in singular numbers for each respective loop.
5. This one and many, grounded in the looping of symbols, reflects a basic odd (singular) and even (many) approach where counting is grounded in self referential loop in which all numbers are the counting of prior numbers and all letters are spelling through other letters (basic pronunciation of any letter necessitates an inherent spelling of that letter).
6. Counting and spelling as subject to looping and equivocation are thus fallacious by nature.
****The same occurs respectively for linguistic symbols of course.