|
Post by waechter418 on Sept 27, 2019 13:28:38 GMT
The following is based on the supposition that unity comprises multiplicity in order to realize itself. The interaction of unity and multiplicity is called ConsciousNess and regarded as an inter-extrapolation that relates in a viewpoint which manifests ConsciousNess.* * (The particular spelling is to emphasize the relativity of Conscious: purposeful, aware – and Ness: being, existence) In 2750, an Egyptian priest of Ptah paraphrased it like this: “The seeing of the eyes, the hearing of the ears and the breathing of the nose report to the mind; the mind is the centre of cognition, the tongue expresses the cognized” – and since this cognition consists of a reflection & projection, the priest added – “thus gods are made”. The Egyptians called the cognition Hoor Paar Kraat (Horus the Child) and its Reflection & Projection Isis & Osiris. This relativity, or state of ConsciousNess, did apparently not suffice, as they reflected & projected Isis & Osiris with Nephtys & Seth, setting off a contrary Reflection/Projection (R/P) dynamic, wherein Horus became the arbiter of its pole positions – or field limits – and thus an intermediate viewpoint. Cultures subjected to this contrary R/P dynamic, called it a war of gods. In the Egyptian version, Seth divided Osiris and claimed his throne – or pole position – which put him into opposition to Horus, who joined (wed) his “mother” Isis. With the son of this marriage the entire process repeated itself – that is: the contrary R/P field and its intermediate viewpoint were doubled and turned into an eight-pole R/P dynamic which filled the Egyptian pantheon with numerous Horus (& Osiris) variants. The history of Egyptian ConsciousNess (or religion) demonstrates, that it was henceforth governed by attempts to restrain this division-multiplication process through a 9th pole (or god) –which might have been the first monopolistic (or monotheistic) attempt to transform the intermediate into an absolute viewpoint – in order to fix the pole positions and thus inhibit the creation of additional R/P fields and viewpoints. It is not known if the priests realized that thereby they fixed the contraries too, or if they feared losing their prosperous pantheon-managements, when they exiled this so called “Aton” to (or with) the Israeli tribes, whom he henceforth ruled under the term JHVH. And it was the son (Jesus) of this (four-poled) contrary R/P field, whose (cross-shaped) coordinate got established in the Hellenic time/space, where it became a principal pattern for the formation of the Occident. The R/P patterns of the Egyptians and the ancient Greeks were similar, except that the Greeks established four intermediary viewpoints and thus a contrary field within contrary fields, which brought about a R/P mode that was to become renown as rationalism (after the Latin ratio = calculation) and to give birth to the philosophers and geometricians who separated the fields and assigned one to psyche and one to soma (mind & matter), turning them into the cornerstones of a polarisation-dynamic that was going to shape – with the help of religion and science – the occidental cultures. In 1904 appeared LIBER AL VEL LEGIS. LAL reveals that when Dualisms reach their (linear) limits, a (non-linear) inter/extrapolation takes place which forms the selfcomplementary R/P relativity of Selfconsciousness. The Inter/Extrapolation of its R/P-equations (for convenience sake numbered 2-8, 3-7, 4-6) is envisioned spherical and depicted as the following: The R/P poles interrelate in 3 phases: 4~6 cognition 3~7 understanding and 2~8 (Self) knowledge - 5 marks the Point of View, O the circumference and 1-1 (LAL eleven) the R/P equation of SelfConsciousNess. In LAL it is called a star, embodying a microcosm which relates a macrocosm. Macrocosm is the inter/extrapolation-sphere of stars, or microcosms. The force of their inter/extrapolation is Love under Will.
|
|
|
Post by waechter418 on Oct 7, 2019 15:38:31 GMT
2 Reflections & Projections are time/space relativities of the inter/extrapolation of ConsciousNess.
There are three principal Reflection/Projection modes – the alternating, whose manifestations complement each other – the contrary, where they contrast each other, and the dualistic R/P, whose manifestations appear separate.
The alternating R/P is typical for the Orient, whereas the contrary R/P has been dominating the Egyptian, Mesopotamian and Hellenic cultures and became the foundation of the dualistic R/P that determines the Occident and its cultures. (Orient & Occident represent here R/P systems as well as cerebral & global hemispheres)
Every R/P mode has a characteristic time/space and corresponding life- & death rites. In the alternating R/P the dissolving body (soma) is left to earth, fire, water or air, while the psyche is kept alive with rituals – particularly where it is believed to be essential for the re-incarnation of the soma aspect.
In the contrary R/P the body receives a space, or room, furnished with life-utensils, while (notably in Egypt) symbols and data-cards (Stele) are employed to keep the diseased present. With the doubling of the R/P field, that space is perceived as another world (or dimension) wherein the deceased has to justify his existence to the gods in charge of it – i.e. of the measures and values it is composed of.
In Dualism the times & spaces of the living & the dead are not only divided, but also fractured by the counter-dynamics of its R/P fields. Thus the dead wind up in heavens above and hells below, while the spaces of the living get subdivided into sections for you & me, pasts & futures, inner & outer worlds, one for psyche and one for soma, in short: times & spaces for everything they fear from death – and hope from it as well, since their existence is not only determined by their fear of death, but also by their fear of life.
Existence is to realize ConsciousNess. In the alternating R/P system, existence appears as a change and in the contrary as an action/reaction that triggers in Dualism feedback-emotions (mostly in form of fear) and promotes notions like existence being a fight, or even a will, of survival. However, fear is not will, but weakness.
Fear restricts the interactivity of psyche & soma. (mind & body)
The myriad varieties of psyche-soma relativities and the ways they affirm and express themselves, demonstrate the innumerable Selfrealisation possibilities of ConsciousNess and its lust & joy of existence.
In undivided R/P systems the lust & joy of existence are revered with sex, art & war, and in some cultures with the sacrifice of the body to the feast of life. In the Occident, where the separation of life & death culminated in the sacrifice of the son of its god, and where the lust & joy of existence got corrupted by a religion that thrives on misery and merchant-emotions, not only lust & joy degenerated, but also the understanding that when the body dissolves, there remains that which is reflected & projected as its life and death.
Thus there is the death of those whose existence is determined by fear & hope – and the death of those who associate it with the death of the dogs.
There is the death of the one who consumes himself in the fire of Selfrealisation and there is the dissolution of the one who determines his life as well as his death. To him existence is the Great Ritual and death the crown of it.
Who designs his life with death in sight, can be certain of a rich life as well as of a rich death.
Survival concepts may intensify the experience of existence through emotions like fear & hope – but they also confine it into a time/space with a deadly exit. 3 The constellations of the manifestations of ConsciousNess are interactive; their reciprocal changes maintain the balance of existence.
Every constellation comprises poles that determine its time/space. The poles unite in Here/Now, which thus functions also as transformation point of the manifestation.
The formation- & dissolution phases of the constellations are concurrent.
When a constellation dissolves, its components become part of another constellation. The transition phase is commonly called “nothing” and interpret as absence of existence. However, there is no absence of existence, but only an absence of its coherence, or an (local time/space)interruption of its continuity.
To claim that the components of existence eliminate each other in order to survive is to claim that existence destroys itself in order to exist. This (for the dual/linear perspective typical) contradiction impedes the awareness that the combination possibilities of existence are infinite.
The ways the interrelations of the constellations of ConsciousNess are observed, reveal also the patterns and dynamics of the observers Selfrealisation attempts.
ConsciousNess is a self-complementary continuum stimulated by Will & Love. 4 Will & Love are the strong force of ConsciousNess.
Will is the force of creation and Love the force that relates (unites) its manifestations.
Will has no cause, nor can it be deduced from effects – Will is cause and effect, both are united through Love.
Will is absolute – unless subjected to morals & purpose, or otherwise adulterated.
Will cannot be willed, as there are no two Wills.
Seeking the origins of Will and the construction plans of creation is seeking to avoid self-responsibility.
There are lots of talks about free will, usually motivated by the hope to get wishes fulfilled, but where there is Will there are neither wishes nor hopes.
Where Will is divided, weaknesses arise.
The force of Will & Love might be measured through weaknesses, but woe him who tries to measure it.
The force of Will & Love expresses as harmony, beauty & joy – the lack of it as discontinuity, sadness and filth.
Will & Love is also the force of imagination & inspiration – both are essential for self-design.
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Oct 7, 2019 16:54:40 GMT
Interesting post, elaborate further on "reflection" and "projection". Are you claiming reflection would be equivalent to self reflection of the point of consciousness (cycle as absolute whole) and projection as self projection of the point of consciousness (line as relative points of awareness)?
Or reflection as passive reception and projection active form?
|
|
|
Post by thesageofmainstreet on Oct 7, 2019 20:07:59 GMT
2 Reflections & Projections are time/space relativities of the inter/extrapolation of ConsciousNess. There are three principal Reflection/Projection modes – the alternating, whose manifestations complement each other – the contrary, where they contrast each other, and the dualistic R/P, whose manifestations appear separate. The alternating R/P is typical for the Orient, whereas the contrary R/P has been dominating the Egyptian, Mesopotamian and Hellenic cultures and became the foundation of the dualistic R/P that determines the Occident and its cultures. (Orient & Occident represent here R/P systems as well as cerebral & global hemispheres) Every R/P mode has a characteristic time/space and corresponding life- & death rites. In the alternating R/P the dissolving body (soma) is left to earth, fire, water or air, while the psyche is kept alive with rituals – particularly where it is believed to be essential for the re-incarnation of the soma aspect. In the contrary R/P the body receives a space, or room, furnished with life-utensils, while (notably in Egypt) symbols and data-cards (Stele) are employed to keep the diseased present. With the doubling of the R/P field, that space is perceived as another world (or dimension) wherein the deceased has to justify his existence to the gods in charge of it – i.e. of the measures and values it is composed of. In Dualism the times & spaces of the living & the dead are not only divided, but also fractured by the counter-dynamics of its R/P fields. Thus the dead wind up in heavens above and hells below, while the spaces of the living get subdivided into sections for you & me, pasts & futures, inner & outer worlds, one for psyche and one for soma, in short: times & spaces for everything they fear from death – and hope from it as well, since their existence is not only determined by their fear of death, but also by their fear of life. Existence is to realize ConsciousNess. In the alternating R/P system, existence appears as a change and in the contrary as an action/reaction that triggers in Dualism feedback-emotions (mostly in form of fear) and promotes notions like existence being a fight, or even a will, of survival. However, fear is not will, but weakness. Fear restricts the interactivity of psyche & soma. (mind & body) The myriad varieties of psyche-soma relativities and the ways they affirm and express themselves, demonstrate the innumerable Selfrealisation possibilities of ConsciousNess and its lust & joy of existence. In undivided R/P systems the lust & joy of existence are revered with sex, art & war, and in some cultures with the sacrifice of the body to the feast of life. In the Occident, where the separation of life & death culminated in the sacrifice of the son of its god, and where the lust & joy of existence got corrupted by a religion that thrives on misery and merchant-emotions, not only lust & joy degenerated, but also the understanding that when the body dissolves, there remains that which is reflected & projected as its life and death. Thus there is the death of those whose existence is determined by fear & hope – and the death of those who associate it with the death of the dogs. There is the death of the one who consumes himself in the fire of Selfrealisation and there is the dissolution of the one who determines his life as well as his death. To him existence is the Great Ritual and death the crown of it. Who designs his life with death in sight, can be certain of a rich life as well as of a rich death. Survival concepts may intensify the experience of existence through emotions like fear & hope – but they also confine it into a time/space with a deadly exit. 3 The constellations of the manifestations of ConsciousNess are interactive; their reciprocal changes maintain the balance of existence. Every constellation comprises poles that determine its time/space. The poles unite in Here/Now, which thus functions also as transformation point of the manifestation. The formation- & dissolution phases of the constellations are concurrent. When a constellation dissolves, its components become part of another constellation. The transition phase is commonly called “nothing” and interpret as absence of existence. However, there is no absence of existence, but only an absence of its coherence, or an (local time/space)interruption of its continuity. To claim that the components of existence eliminate each other in order to survive is to claim that existence destroys itself in order to exist. This (for the dual/linear perspective typical) contradiction impedes the awareness that the combination possibilities of existence are infinite. The ways the interrelations of the constellations of ConsciousNess are observed, reveal also the patterns and dynamics of the observers Selfrealisation attempts. ConsciousNess is a self-complementary continuum stimulated by Will & Love. 4 Will & Love are the strong force of ConsciousNess. Will is the force of creation and Love the force that relates (unites) its manifestations. Will has no cause, nor can it be deduced from effects – Will is cause and effect, both are united through Love. Will is absolute – unless subjected to morals & purpose, or otherwise adulterated. Will cannot be willed, as there are no two Wills. Seeking the origins of Will and the construction plans of creation is seeking to avoid self-responsibility. There are lots of talks about free will, usually motivated by the hope to get wishes fulfilled, but where there is Will there are neither wishes nor hopes. Where Will is divided, weaknesses arise. The force of Will & Love might be measured through weaknesses, but woe him who tries to measure it. The force of Will & Love expresses as harmony, beauty & joy – the lack of it as discontinuity, sadness and filth. Will & Love is also the force of imagination & inspiration – both are essential for self-design. Will Has to Be Armed With a High IQ; the Only Other Choice Is to Let Yourself Be PersecutedWhat do you think of Schopenhauer's theory, in The World As Will and Idea? He didn't need to be so pessimistic and passive about it. Be aware of the Will trying to control you, but try to control it yourself or divert it rather than foolishly block it or slavishly give in to it. It also affects reasoning. However, the weakling emotions of fad-addicted nerds can't be the Will; they must be something else, just as there is a Will to Power, Activity, Participation, and Command, there is an entirely separate Death Wish. John Nash blocked his Will from childhood until marriage, and look what happened to him. The enemies of the mind made him addicted to mind-candy, which made him sick, like those boys who turned into pigs in Pinocchio.
|
|
|
Post by jonbain on Oct 7, 2019 21:07:44 GMT
ever yet more endless sophistry
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Oct 7, 2019 21:56:47 GMT
ever yet more endless sophistry Not really, I understand quite a few points. Do I agree with it all? No, but that does not negate certain points.
Jon...how is your theory not sophistry?
Still waiting for the Newton / Aristotelian Logic answer....sophist.
|
|
|
Post by waechter418 on Oct 10, 2019 21:37:41 GMT
Everyone is (ought to be) his own creator and has as such infinite self-design possibilities – each of them having, when motivated by the Will & Love to realize oneself, the potential to bring about a self-image wherein all creations complement each other.
Self-design is practiced in every R/P system and an option for him who is unable to realize himself in Dualisms and has difficulties with the Selfrealisation envisioned and practiced in the Orient.
There is active and passive self-design, the active projects and the passive reflects a self-image, both complement each other through Will & Love.
In the reflection Will & Love may be localized (reasoned, moralized, etc), but that brings about reaction-images which are not complementary.
In the projection is no space for reasons and morals – however there might be a lack of Will & Love that weakens the reflection.
To weak self-images strong projections may appear as a threat– but that should not restrain the projection, otherwise the force of Will & Love gets dispersed. The same happens when the projection is tested, since the test affects the reflection - moreover, there is no test for perfection. Nor is the projection to be charged with expectations, as they get amplified by the reflection, causing divisions and multiplications that interrupt the interactivity of micro- and macro cosmos and fracture the self-image.
The projection has to be free of emotions, reasons and other restrains, in order to enable the reflection to complement the self-image according to its Will & Love.
Self-design enhances the awareness of the Selfrealisation process. The awareness gets impaired when the self-image lacks lust and joy, is loaded and distorted with emotions, mistreated with causalities and moralities, subjugated to parasitical selfrealisation-attempts and/or infected with the possession virus.
Disorder arises when the Self-designer, instead of exercising his will, represents and executes the wills of “others” – adopts handed down identity rites – or subjugates himself to commercial, religious, ideological and collective identification schemes.
Self-design is subject to Will & Love, the strong force of ConsciousNess. The lack of it could be regarded as a personal debility-period, were there not the many representatives of the weak forces who, for lack of own images & orders, attach themselves to those of the strong. A relationship (in collective-images represented by rulers and serfs) that seems inevitable, since the strong and the weak forces are complementary and attempts to change this relativity are its balance-mechanisms in order for everything to remain as it is. But the self-designer ought not to rely on such “auto-controls”, as he is responsible for every aspect of his order – and his weak and their weaknesses are part of it.
One manner of self-design is to arrange the components of the self-image according to their capability to complement each other. In such case it is of little consequence what its reference points are called, or which shapes, scales and quantities they present, as every unity is infinite. Nevertheless, it is recommendable to keep the reference points interchangeable and in small numbers, in order to have a flexible and clear self-image.
In rigid structures a reference point might receive disproportionate attributes and thus a priority that provokes comparisons which impede the interactivity of the components and the harmony of the self-image.
Ill ordered self-images may be rearranged with sex and drugs – but with care, as sex can alter the pole positions of the psyche-soma-relativity, whereas every drug has a particular potential and amplifies the intentions it is taken with.
Drugs can also be used to stimulate the imagination that helps furnishing the self-image – which ought to be splendorous, as it intensifies the awareness.
To claim a self-image being objectively true, is a lie and a fatal one, not because it hides an objective truth – as some of its gurus claim – but because it paralyses the creativity and makes the creator a victim, or prisoner, of his creation.
In the Occident it has become fashionable to import and copy Oriental self-design techniques and corresponding images, despite that they are based on cosmologies that differ profoundly from those of the Occident; moreover, every microcosm is bound to its macrocosm (& vice versa) and mixing cosmologies or R/P systems brings about confusion.
Self-design with the help of teachers and teachings seems to be the easiest, but is more complicated, since most of them have rules and restrictions regarding Selfrealization, not to mention, that every teacher has and represents a particular self-image. Moreover, how is one to realize oneself through the images of others, if ones does not know one’s own? And there is of course the risk of getting caught in parasitic images and in the traps of self-denial – that is: to be something else than one is.
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Oct 10, 2019 22:28:25 GMT
How does one make a choice without each choice, as the polarization of some prior pole, beimg subject to the law of polarization?
Law is created, but this in itself is law and as such intrinsically an empty circle.
Polarity exists through choice, and choice through polarity, both are one and the same necessitating free will as an act of submittance to Divine Law.
To assume and be imprinted (reflect) and to project assumed patterns (project) necessitates further dualisms as variations of this dualisms (passive/active, female/Male, 0/1, black/ white, evil/good, down/up...etc.) where polarity as the simultaneous assuming and being assumed that results in the forms.
A person assuming an image and projecting that image as a variaton observes the image as polar point diverging from the prior image.
The same occurs with the persons awareness before and after assuming the object, a polarization occurs. The polarization of polarization effectively is what gives rise to form, starting with the assumption of assumptions and the voiding of void...leading to a circularity.
To argue any form of creativity alone, as expressing freedom, is to not only root freedom in its antithetical quality of destruction as well, but also make freedom as subject to a law of perpetual cycles.
Freedom necessitates law that one both submits to and manifests.
|
|
|
Post by Elizabeth on Oct 12, 2019 3:26:15 GMT
So are you saying we are all gods from the moment we got sight, hearing and everything else?
|
|
|
Post by waechter418 on Oct 12, 2019 17:40:56 GMT
How does one make a choice without each choice, as the polarization of some prior pole, beimg subject to the law of polarization? Law is created, but this in itself is law and as such intrinsically an empty circle. Polarity exists through choice, and choice through polarity, both are one and the same necessitating free will as an act of submittance to Divine Law. To assume and be imprinted (reflect) and to project assumed patterns (project) necessitates further dualisms as variations of this dualisms (passive/active, female/Male, 0/1, black/ white, evil/good, down/up...etc.) where polarity as the simultaneous assuming and being assumed that results in the forms. A person assuming an image and projecting that image as a variaton observes the image as polar point diverging from the prior image. The same occurs with the persons awareness before and after assuming the object, a polarization occurs. The polarization of polarization effectively is what gives rise to form, starting with the assumption of assumptions and the voiding of void...leading to a circularity. To argue any form of creativity alone, as expressing freedom, is to not only root freedom in its antithetical quality of destruction as well, but also make freedom as subject to a law of perpetual cycles. Freedom necessitates law that one both submits to and manifests. As it takes me ages to formulate my views satisfyingly, permit me to quote from chapter 23 of my website:
The polarisation dynamic arises from dualities and is thus innate to every R/P system. In the contrary R/P mode it is more pronounced and when latter applied to Dualism an auto-division/multiplication ensues which is in LAL under the aegis of the Egyptian war-god Ra-Hoor-Khu, and actually manifests in the fragmentation of the religious, social, moral, political, economical & most other frameworks that have been constituting the Occident. Personifying the polarisation dynamic, Ra-Hoor-Khu can also be regarded as its persona juridical who searches and destroys that which impedes the Selfrealisation. The persona juridical manifests in every R/P system and is generally considered a persona problematical as it evokes that which it is to eliminate. Eliminating dualities with dualities, Ra-Hoor-Khu may also be considered a short path of Selfrealisation in Dualism.
|
|
|
Post by waechter418 on Oct 12, 2019 17:49:42 GMT
So are you saying we are all gods from the moment we got sight, hearing and everything else? I am not that silly !
|
|
|
Post by waechter418 on Oct 12, 2019 17:59:11 GMT
10
Every manifestation of ConsciousNess contains an unknown factor, which – when known – becomes another manifestation - thus multiplicity is born. Multiplicity is the cradle of differentiation – differentiation is subject to the R/P modes - their viewpoints cause restrictions - restriction retards Selfrealisation. Attempts to reverse this process are many and differ according to the R/P modes - but rarely seem to make it past Ego.
Ego is a close circuit that consists of 8 R/P poles with 2 viewpoints which relate the poles in a cube-like manner. When the two viewpoints check each other, a pseudo-self-consciousness comes about that has deceived Homo in all hemispheres & ages and been the cause of most of his troubles – particularly concerning his Selfrealisation quest. The worldwide increasing popularity of Ego is probably because its two viewpoints are used as time/space coordinates, whereas its pseudo-self-consciousness appears as a kind of unity. Ego is also subject to the polarization-dynamic of Ra-Hoor-Khu, who, due to his Egyptian origin, represents moreover the contrary R/P mode, which enables to eliminate one of the two viewpoints and thus turn Ego into a R/P dynamic that relates itself through one viewpoint at a time (not to be confused with the Point of View of SelfConsciousNess).
The Ego mode of Ra-Hoor-Khu is only applicable in Dualism; it makes him who understands to handle the two sides (or viewpoints) as one, to the ruler of its dimension (and destroys the inapt user). Ego is the favored operation field of the Self-designer and the Warrior, as it enables to eliminate that which opposes and to crystallize that which supports the Selfrealisation.
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Oct 12, 2019 19:01:22 GMT
How does one make a choice without each choice, as the polarization of some prior pole, beimg subject to the law of polarization? Law is created, but this in itself is law and as such intrinsically an empty circle. Polarity exists through choice, and choice through polarity, both are one and the same necessitating free will as an act of submittance to Divine Law. To assume and be imprinted (reflect) and to project assumed patterns (project) necessitates further dualisms as variations of this dualisms (passive/active, female/Male, 0/1, black/ white, evil/good, down/up...etc.) where polarity as the simultaneous assuming and being assumed that results in the forms. A person assuming an image and projecting that image as a variaton observes the image as polar point diverging from the prior image. The same occurs with the persons awareness before and after assuming the object, a polarization occurs. The polarization of polarization effectively is what gives rise to form, starting with the assumption of assumptions and the voiding of void...leading to a circularity. To argue any form of creativity alone, as expressing freedom, is to not only root freedom in its antithetical quality of destruction as well, but also make freedom as subject to a law of perpetual cycles. Freedom necessitates law that one both submits to and manifests. As it takes me ages to formulate my views satisfyingly, permit me to quote from chapter 23 of my website:
The polarisation dynamic arises from dualities and is thus innate to every R/P system. In the contrary R/P mode it is more pronounced and when latter applied to Dualism an auto-division/multiplication ensues which is in LAL under the aegis of the Egyptian war-god Ra-Hoor-Khu, and actually manifests in the fragmentation of the religious, social, moral, political, economical & most other frameworks that have been constituting the Occident. Personifying the polarisation dynamic, Ra-Hoor-Khu can also be regarded as its persona juridical who searches and destroys that which impedes the Selfrealisation. The persona juridical manifests in every R/P system and is generally considered a persona problematical as it evokes that which it is to eliminate. Eliminating dualities with dualities, Ra-Hoor-Khu may also be considered a short path of Selfrealisation in Dualism. 1. Define Occident again as it is a variation of "accident". 2. It appears, the Egyptians where anthropomizing universal principles for the masses while simultaneously arguing consciousness stems from universal self referencing laws that are not limited to an anthropomorphic nature alone. 3. Agreed: division and multiplication occur simultaneously, the individuation of a point is a paradox. If one point Inverts to two points it automatically divides and multiplies at the same time, thus all whole numbers and fractions/fractals are isomorphisms of the other. The point is the beginning of observation as that which is intrinsically empty and formless thus "assumes" or is imprinted by images. Emptiness of mind or blank slate is synonymous. Object assumed, in turn is a simultaneous point of awareness thus as "assumed" it is imprinted by the images assumed by the point of awareness. Example: I assume a piece of clay. In assuming it, I filter it through the assumptions of a form (statue). Thus in accepting the clay and I give form to it into a statue where the clay is formed by me. The convergence of the empty mind and the relatively formless clay, negate eachother leaving the statue as the morphing of two points of reality much in the same manner two points negate themselves into a line. 4. Ra-Hoor-Khu, as an anthropormization of negation (destruction), appears as a reflection of "Set" which also is an anthropormization of the principle of negation (destruction). Elaborate further. ***The Dualism Of Dualisms Necessitates Negation (Destruction) As Having A Quadratic Nature. Agree/disagree/maybe to the above?
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Oct 12, 2019 19:07:44 GMT
10 Every manifestation of ConsciousNess contains an unknown factor, which – when known – becomes another manifestation - thus multiplicity is born. Multiplicity is the cradle of differentiation – differentiation is subject to the R/P modes - their viewpoints cause restrictions - restriction retards Selfrealisation. Attempts to reverse this process are many and differ according to the R/P modes - but rarely seem to make it past Ego. Ego is a close circuit that consists of 8 R/P poles with 2 viewpoints which relate the poles in a cube-like manner. When the two viewpoints check each other, a pseudo-self-consciousness comes about that has deceived Homo in all hemispheres & ages and been the cause of most of his troubles – particularly concerning his Selfrealisation quest. The worldwide increasing popularity of Ego is probably because its two viewpoints are used as time/space coordinates, whereas its pseudo-self-consciousness appears as a kind of unity. Value placement on the polarity of materialism over transcendentalism where the image is given authority? Ego is also subject to the polarization-dynamic of Ra-Hoor-Khu, who, due to his Egyptian origin, represents moreover the contrary R/P mode, which enables to eliminate one of the two viewpoints and thus turn Ego into a R/P dynamic that relates itself through one viewpoint at a time (not to be confused with the Point of View of SelfConsciousNess). The Ego mode of Ra-Hoor-Khu is only applicable in Dualism; it makes him who understands to handle the two sides (or viewpoints) as one, to the ruler of its dimension (and destroys the inapt user). Ego is the favored operation field of the Self-designer and the Warrior, as it enables to eliminate that which opposes and to crystallize that which supports the Selfrealisation. True Ego seeks to dominate all things (destroy), including itself? It seeks death of all as a death of the self allowing for "all"?
|
|
|
Post by waechter418 on Oct 12, 2019 21:17:58 GMT
As it takes me ages to formulate my views satisfyingly, permit me to quote from chapter 23 of my website:
The polarisation dynamic arises from dualities and is thus innate to every R/P system. In the contrary R/P mode it is more pronounced and when latter applied to Dualism an auto-division/multiplication ensues which is in LAL under the aegis of the Egyptian war-god Ra-Hoor-Khu, and actually manifests in the fragmentation of the religious, social, moral, political, economical & most other frameworks that have been constituting the Occident. Personifying the polarisation dynamic, Ra-Hoor-Khu can also be regarded as its persona juridical who searches and destroys that which impedes the Selfrealisation. The persona juridical manifests in every R/P system and is generally considered a persona problematical as it evokes that which it is to eliminate. Eliminating dualities with dualities, Ra-Hoor-Khu may also be considered a short path of Selfrealisation in Dualism. 1. Define Occident again as it is a variation of "accident". 2. It appears, the Egyptians where anthropomizing universal principles for the masses while simultaneously arguing consciousness stems from universal self referencing laws that are not limited to an anthropomorphic nature alone. 3. Agreed: division and multiplication occur simultaneously, the individuation of a point is a paradox. If one point Inverts to two points it automatically divides and multiplies at the same time, thus all whole numbers and fractions/fractals are isomorphisms of the other. The point is the beginning of observation as that which is intrinsically empty and formless thus "assumes" or is imprinted by images. Emptiness of mind or blank slate is synonymous. Object assumed, in turn is a simultaneous point of awareness thus as "assumed" it is imprinted by the images assumed by the point of awareness. Example: I assume a piece of clay. In assuming it, I filter it through the assumptions of a form (statue). Thus in accepting the clay and I give form to it into a statue where the clay is formed by me. The convergence of the empty mind and the relatively formless clay, negate eachother leaving the statue as the morphing of two points of reality much in the same manner two points negate themselves into a line. 4. Ra-Hoor-Khu, as an anthropormization of negation (destruction), appears as a reflection of "Set" which also is an anthropormization of the principle of negation (destruction). Elaborate further. ***The Dualism Of Dualisms Necessitates Negation (Destruction) As Having A Quadratic Nature. Agree/disagree/maybe to the above? P.S: i do not speculate about empties but about manifestations of ConsciousNess (The particular spelling is to emphasize the relativity of Conscious: purposeful, aware – and Ness: being, existence)
|
|