|
Post by jonbain on Sept 24, 2019 23:07:22 GMT
Trying to understand Planetology is always going to be an open-ended debate. We can never be certain, because there are just too many variables. Anyone who denies this, is not being rational.
I have not formally constructed an article for this reason, and time constraints. But I have established what I take to be the most plausible theory.
Long scale changes beyond 1 million years are irrelevant and likely too complex to properly understand with accuracy.
Cycles of ice-ages and wet ages of approximately 100 000 years have been established in fairly neat cycles from data obtained from the Vostok ice-core.
We are currently in the last thousand years of such a cycle. Ocean levels are very high, and as we reach the hottest point, the entire planet suddenly freezes over with ocean levels 'suddenly' dropping radically.
So why?
It seems that the CO2 and other greenhouse gasses reach a critical point and, a bit like a thermostat, a sudden switch is triggered.
The most likely scenario is that CO2 (&ggasses) are the by- product of life forms. When a planet is hot, more of these life forms produce more CO2 which causes the classic global warming. But more importantly, life-forms which absorb CO2 become weaker in this part of the cycle.
So it seems that humans are not all that special, and it could have been bears or some type of ocean life that could have triggered previous cycles of warming and ice-age.
But because these details are well below sea-level, there is even the distinct possibility that humans could have been the culprits 100 000 years ago too. Simply lots of fires would have this effect.
Humans are the current antagonist as well as the best potential cure. We have gobbled 90% of fish from the sea over the last 200 years which means that we have also stopped fish from fertilizing the oceans - and thus there has been a sudden dropping off of zoo-plankton.
These are the creatures that could absorb our CO2.
So the only solution is to replenish the oceans, which is a monumental task.
I have more detail, but I want this to be readable and debatable.
|
|
|
Post by jonbain on Feb 4, 2021 16:50:24 GMT
always nice to know that others find the exact same answers
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Feb 4, 2021 17:58:11 GMT
Hell. Those academics who refused your works then were stupid freaks. You find out alone things they spend years to discover.
|
|