shazou
Full Member
Posts: 231
Likes: 92
Meta-Ethnicity: Austronesian
Ethnicity: Filipino
Country: Philippines
Location: Makati
Ancestry: 1/2 North Ilocano 1/2 Central Luzonian
Taxonomy: Sudsinid-Protomalayid + residual Gracile Mediterranid
Y-DNA: C-M130
mtDNA: B4a1a3a
Politics: Apolitical
Relationship Status: Single
Hero: René Descartes
Age: 38
Philosophy: Cartesian
|
Post by shazou on Jul 21, 2019 19:30:30 GMT
explain..
poll will be added..
|
|
|
|
Post by Elizabeth on Jul 26, 2019 21:23:23 GMT
True. A person who knows math knows it's true
|
|
Clovis Merovingian
Prestige/VIP 
Elder
Posts: 2,689 
Likes: 1,757
Meta-Ethnicity: Anglo-American
Ethnicity: Deep Southerner
Country: My State and my Region are my country
Region: The Deep South
Location: South Carolina
Ancestry: Gaelic (patrilineal), English, Ulster Scots/Scots Irish, Scottish, German, Swiss German, Swedish, Manx, Finnish, Norman French/Quebecois (distantly), Dutch (distantly)
Taxonomy: Borreby/Alpine/ Nordid mix
Y-DNA: R-S660/R-DF109
mtDNA: T1a1
Politics: Conservative
Religion: Christian
Hero: Andrew Jackson, Thomas Jefferson, James K. Polk
Age: 30
Philosophy: I try to find out what is true as best I can.
|
Post by Clovis Merovingian on Jul 27, 2019 4:01:43 GMT
It's an objective fact. Math is not one of those interpretive subjects like Literature, Art, etc. The answer is the answer.
|
|
|
|
Post by DKTrav88 on Jul 27, 2019 6:00:09 GMT
2 apples plus 3 apples equals 5 apples
If you add a 2 next to a 3, you have 23
But, everyone should know what 2+3 is and that it isn't adding a 2 next to a 3.
|
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 27, 2019 11:35:40 GMT
2 apples plus 3 apples equals 5 apples If you add a 2 next to a 3, you have 23 But, everyone should know what 2+3 is and that it isn't adding a 2 next to a 3. wow, the tenacity and the eagerness with how u explain, like really striving for others to realize you are not dumb. |
|
|
|
Post by joustos on Jul 27, 2019 16:37:04 GMT
explain..
poll will be added..
2+3 = 5. This is an analytical judgement: it is necessarily (or undoubtedly) true. Demonstrably:
2=(1+1) Definition 3= (1+1+1) Definition 5 = (1+1+1+1+1) Definition 5 = (1+1) + (1+1+1), or vice-versa by the law of commutation; Q.E.D.
|
|
|
|
Post by jamespullman on Jul 27, 2019 17:39:50 GMT
Some are not that sure....
|
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 28, 2019 12:19:59 GMT
not surprised to see fundamental christians barging in to show tehy have something left in there upper story. Its even more funny. u all 3 are blondes
|
|
|
|
Post by joustos on Jul 28, 2019 14:58:51 GMT
Some are not that sure.... Is (2+2) = 5? [(1+1) + (1+1)] =? (1+1+1+1+1) No; they = 4 since, by definition: 4= 1+1+1+1 or (1+1)+(1+1) |
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Jul 29, 2019 21:01:32 GMT
We don't know what deities we aim in this formula. Either 2, 3, or 5 are plain numbers, or this is myriads of numbers (enormously large numbers)? (2 + 3 = 4) A1. 2 <=> 2 (two has two curves) A2. 3 <=> 2 (three has two curves) A3. 2 + 2 = 4 (Russel and Whitehead did prove it) P1. 2 + 3 = 5 (change: first number on A1) P2. 2 + 2 = 5 (change: second number on A2) P3. (a = b) -> (b = a) (an algebraic truth) P4. (2 + 2 = 5) -> (5 = 2 + 2) (change: a/2+3; b/5) P5. 5 = 2 + 2 (MP: P4, P2) P6. {(a = b) ^ (b = c)} -> (a = c) (transition) P7. {(2 + 3 = 5) ^ (5 = 2 + 2)} -> (2 + 3 = 2 + 2) (change: a/2+3; b/5; c/2+2) P8. p -> {q -> } (tautology) P9. (2 + 3 = 5) -> {(5 = 2 + 2) -> [(2 + 3 = 5)^(5 = 2 + 2)]} (change...)
P10. 5 = 2 + 2 -> [(2 + 3 = 5) ^ (5 = 2 + 2)] (MP: P9, P5)
P11. (2 + 3 = 5) ^ (5 = 2 + 2) (MP: P10, P2)
P12. 2 + 3 = 2 + 2 (MP: P7, P11)
P13. {(2 + 3 = 2 + 2) ^ (2 + 2 = 4)} -> (2 + 3 = 4) (change: using P6)
P14. (2 + 3 = 2 + 2) -> {(2 + 2 = 4) -> [(2 + 3 = 2 + 2)^(2 + 2 = 4)]} (change: using P8)
P15. 2 + 2 = 4 -> (2 + 3 = 2 + 2 ^ 2 + 2 = 4) (MP: P14, P11)
P16. 2 + 3 = 2 + 2 ^ 2 + 2 = 4 (MP: P15, A3)
P17. 2 + 3 = 4 (MP: P13, P16) |
|
