|
|
Post by kneltpompaiye on Nov 7, 2017 23:58:47 GMT
The Human BILINE (Human Abiogenesis/Bilineity Theory)
The relation of a body to other bodies and the function of the body in any Ordered System determine the varying form and specific characteristics of its varying species of which perform complementary functions
Though there is noticeable similarities between a human and an ape, human is never an offshoot of an ape
The homogeneous form of distinct species is a proof of basic chemical structure, never of common ancestry, while the slight variation in, and variation on pigmentation stem from the ecology of the Abiogenesis Environment.
Human, like all other distinct species have Multi-Abiogenesis-Stimulation Port (Multi-Ancestral Origin) called BILINE
The Abiogenesis Humans had a very short life-span. The life-span of humans began to increase when they developed the instinct for copulation and, began to share their gens through offspring
The point of instinctive infatuation of human species X(s) of distinct BILINE (Xa,Xb,Xc,Xd,Xe,Xf,Xg,Xh,Xi) and copulation with Y(s) of different sequence and BILINE (Yj,Yk,Yl,Ym,Yn,Yo,Yp,Yq,Yr) and the production of offspring with variation in pigmentation (Xaj,Yaj,Xbk,Ybk,Xcl,Ycl..) and the variation in and On pigmentation that stem from recursively refractive copulation of offspring with one another ( through which humans have populated the earth) up until the moment of humans’ proclivity for Pigment Retention and Dispersion is called the HUMIXBREEDATION Process Age
|
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 11, 2017 19:36:49 GMT
I'm afraid I have to disagree. We come from the species known as Australopitecus, there more subspecies in different periods of time. The line was still continuing while from one of australopitecus the specie homo was established. Long story man, but your majestic spread of... something even unable to plainly understand is just a bunch of pointless words with no meaning. It's like me posting on pornographic forum:
"Hey, just imagine all these awesome ceramics coming from China and all over the world depending on the culture and period of time. They are for 19.99$ for a cup, and 30.99$ for a plate. They were made in different shapes, depending on our customer's wish...".
Yeah, I'm afraid I have to say that your text has no meaning by far, unless you will start to provide arguments to support your theory. Otherwise, I may start to talk that women have penises, and expect everybody to actually take me seriously.
|
|
|
|
Post by brucefenton on Nov 12, 2017 11:51:11 GMT
Humans are primates, all primates have a very small monkey in East Asia as an ancestor around 45 million years ago. Suck it up, facts are facts.
|
|
|
|
Post by Διαμονδ on Nov 12, 2017 11:58:51 GMT
Humans are primates, all primates have a very small monkey in East Asia as an ancestor around 45 million years ago. Suck it up, facts are facts. It's not a very proven fact !  |
|
|
|
Post by Lone Wanderer on Nov 18, 2017 8:55:31 GMT
Humans belong to Great apes family and it does not mean we are from the apes. We and other great apes (bonobos, chimpanzees, gorillas, and orangutans) share common ancestors. It's all about the evolution. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ApeUnlike cool religious stories, in a scientific classification and point of view, humans are just another species. Not more special than other species. We just evolved in our own way. |
|
sculptor
Full Member
Posts: 121
Likes: 20
Meta-Ethnicity: Homonid
Ethnicity: Sapiens Sapiens
Country: United Kingdon of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Region: South
Location: Brighton
Ancestry: Homo Sapiens
Taxonomy: Mammalian
mtDNA: From mt EVE
Politics: Left
Religion: None
Relationship Status: MYOB
Hero: My Grandmother
Age: too old
Philosophy: Always
|
Post by sculptor on Jul 11, 2019 22:28:24 GMT
Humans are primates, all primates have a very small monkey in East Asia as an ancestor around 45 million years ago. Suck it up, facts are facts. It's not a very proven fact ! It is exactly a proven fact. Utterly irrefutable Though the genus comes from Africa, not Asia |
|
gater
Junior Member
Posts: 91
Likes: 22
|
Post by gater on Nov 29, 2019 3:17:02 GMT
Humans belong to Great apes family and it does not mean we are from the apes. We and other great apes (bonobos, chimpanzees, gorillas, and orangutans) share common ancestors. It's all about the evolution. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ApeUnlike cool religious stories, in a scientific classification and point of view, humans are just another species. Not more special than other species. We just evolved in our own way. Exactly right - we didn't come from apes, although we have a common ancestors. We see primates in the wild today that band together, and form tribes. Just as we did millions of years ago. We are the same as them, although we have evolved to what we are now.
|
|
|
|
Post by jonbain on Dec 3, 2019 23:23:51 GMT
Humans belong to Great apes family and it does not mean we are from the apes. We and other great apes (bonobos, chimpanzees, gorillas, and orangutans) share common ancestors. It's all about the evolution. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ApeUnlike cool religious stories, in a scientific classification and point of view, humans are just another species. Not more special than other species. We just evolved in our own way. "just evolved in our own way" describes how science just brushes under the carpet the gaping black-hole in their narrative - we are RADICALLY different from ALL other creatures on the Earth. Even though there is some sort of connection we actually share more psychological features with Dolphins, cats, dogs and horses than we do with apes. Its only if you look at the physical surface and refuse to acknowledge the more relevant psychological issues that you draw a straight line where there is none. If the only fossils you had were a shark and a dolphin you would conclude that the dolphin evolved out of a shark, and that the tail just "randomly mutated" or it just "evolved in its own way". The fact is that in order for evolution to be a real science, it would be provable in a laboratory that inanimate matter can randomly mutate into living matter. Even when contrived in perfect conditions it cannot do this. That evolutionists still pretend they are scientists, is testimony to their lack of rigor in method. And thus ALL their esoteric claims collapse a posteriori, as a matter of lacking ethics in terms of epistemological authenticity. |
|
