It is appalling how badly thought through the big bang theory is.
(1)
If all the matter in the universe were concentrated into
an object the size of a galaxy, then the force and subsequent
velocity from that force, that is required to make it go 'bang'
would be radically in excess of light-speed.
But according to this theory, such a velocity is impossible.
In fact, even if the matter in the universe were in 1/3rd
its current volume, its escape velocity would be greater than
light-speed. Thus it would have to have been expanding faster than
its own laws allowed it to when it was 1/3rd its current volume.
...
(2)
If all the matter in the universe were in one concentrated point it
would in essence just be a gigantic 'black-hole'. But according to
relativistic physics - nothing escapes the black-hole. So once more,
it could simply not go bang, because of Einstein's laws.
The relativistic universe would have been still-born.
...
(3)
Even we ignore the previous reasons, their 'singularity' would
be surrounded by their 'event horizon' - where time has stopped
due to all the excessive gravity. So AGAIN, it could not go
bang without time moving.
...
These are simplified points of a very detailed study which exposes
numerous other flaws in contemporary atheist cosmology.
I do not disagree with ALL modern cosmology, and I do not dispute
the given age of God's Universe as 14 billion years, neither do
do I dispute the expansion / inflation theoretical observations.
What I am saying is that Einstein's theories are illogical - they
contradict themselves, and they are NOT in keeping with basic
observations in astronomy.
I attempt to reconcile much of modern cosmology and astronomy
into a model that has no basic contradictions. This is the essence of it:
LOGIC.
More here:
www.flight-light-and-spin.com/proof/proof-against-big-bang.htm