|
Post by fortharris on May 2, 2019 10:08:20 GMT
ForgivenessWe have a Father-son relationship with the Father, and like our earthly fathers though a crude example, the Father does not hold grudges with his sons. We may err in different ways and even rebel against him, but the Father acknowledging our limited minds and scope of understanding only looks upon us with the hope of helping us grow and mature in the ways of life. The Father, who has a piece of himself in his sons, the spirit fragment of the Father that dwells in all of us, even as our earthly fathers have a piece of themselves in their sons, can only hope to see them flourish and see things as he himself sees them. He has already forgiven all our sins and trespasses. So why then are we required to seek forgiveness when we stray? Whatever sins we may commit the Father has already forgiven. We ask for God’s forgiveness in order to receive the conditioning of our hearts, the feeling of being forgiven, and knowing by faith that he does not hold it against us. The Father’s forgiveness is not even conditional, based on whether we forgive others or not. We do not have an unforgiving father. When we stray, make mistakes, or even consciously do the wrong things on our journey towards perfection, we need not let them hold us down, cause us to lose hope nor despair; it is the Father’s desire that we seek forgiveness and receive that conditioning which does away with the guilt, and encourages us to strive forward towards the goal of becoming Godlike. And just as the Father forgives us to make way for our growth so are we required to forgive others in order not to hinder their spiritual growth. We equally receive that same conditioning when we receive forgiveness from our fellow men, not that God’s forgiveness depends on it. The Father’s love for his sons is infinite; there is no sin that he cannot forgive as long as we have the desire to practice righteousness, and dare to be perfect. References: Mark 10:15 (we are however required to grow to maturity) Luke 17:3–4 Luke 15:11–32 Just like the parable of the rich man and the talents, we are required to grow in truth — not hide it in the ground nor guard it. The Father’s forgiveness is truly unconditional. And just as the Father forgives all our sins so are we required to be boundless in forgiveness towards one another, not only because it is the will of God, but because in this life man can only hope to ascend, and nothing should stand in his way. You will soon come to realize that the will of God is not arbitrary — the will of God is necessity. Reference: Matthew 25:14–30 (do not take a parable beyond its central idea)
|
|
|
Post by greatestiam on May 2, 2019 19:08:27 GMT
ForgivenessWe have a Father-son relationship with the Father,
If so, god is showing himself to be as much of a deadbeat dad with us as he was with Jesus when he dropped him off with Mary after cuckolding Joseph.
This song expresses quite well my thinking about how rude of an a hole god is.
Regards DL
|
|
|
Post by fortharris on May 3, 2019 7:46:04 GMT
ForgivenessWe have a Father-son relationship with the Father,
If so, god is showing himself to be as much of a deadbeat dad with us as he was with Jesus when he dropped him off with Mary after cuckolding Joseph.
This song expresses quite well my thinking about how rude of an a hole god is.
Regards DL
That is a beautiful song. Firstly, God has never ceased to communicate with man, he is constantly sending prophets, eventually sending his son. But will you believe, pay heed to his word, or rather crucify him because he speaks the truth? Man has been told repeatedly that only love will heal the world, but how many practice this? If the lady singing this song will reach out to express love to one soul a day, do you not think that earth will heal? Sing the song of forgiveness, rather than un-forgiveness? Speak to God right where you stand now, be honest about how you truly feel about him, dedicate your heart to him and see if he will not manifest his presence in your life. He says that his hands are outstretched looking for the one who will receive him.
|
|
|
Post by greatestiam on May 18, 2019 14:21:09 GMT
What a weird reply given that your own bible says that it is not up to me whether I believe or not.
Your bible tells me that god decides who he will give the grace to believe and who he will not give it too.
If your genocidal son murdering god is so selective, you might wonder why he chose to not have me believe.
Personally, given your satanic god's morals, I am pleased to not believe in such a satanic god.
I found a moral one. Why haven't you?
Regards DL
|
|
|
Post by thesageofmainstreet on May 18, 2019 19:33:25 GMT
ForgivenessWe have a Father-son relationship with the Father,
If so, god is showing himself to be as much of a deadbeat dad with us as he was with Jesus when he dropped him off with Mary after cuckolding Joseph.
This song expresses quite well my thinking about how rude of an a hole god is.
Regards DL
Sanctifying the Weasel Desire to Get Off the Hook
Atonement is absurd and shows what a lousy father God is. Imagine a boss whipping his son for the poor performance of his employees and expecting them to stop malingering out of pity for the son.
|
|
|
Post by greatestiam on May 19, 2019 20:33:25 GMT
thesageofmainstreet
It is even worse.
We are all children of god, to the sheeple that is, yet they do not mind that their god would punish the innocent son instead of the guilty one.
Now that takes a lot of brain and morality killing by the lying religious con men to have good honest people swallow such garbage without throwing it back up.
Regards DL
|
|
|
Post by thesageofmainstreet on May 19, 2019 21:23:39 GMT
thesageofmainstreet It is even worse. We are all children of god, to the sheeple that is, yet they do not mind that their god would punish the innocent son instead of the guilty one. Now that takes a lot of brain and morality killing by the lying religious con men to have good honest people swallow such garbage without throwing it back up. Regards DL Render Therefore Unto CaesarIt is a strange kind of psychology involved, as if they are secretly pleased by Jesus getting punished so brutally for his sissyboy, doormat, turn-the-other-cheek sermons. I also notice something strange in the fascination of Rightists with the bloodbath at Omaha Beach in Saving Private Ryan. These drooling blowhards had no problem with flag-waving Bush's capital treason in begging his Daddy to get him out of having to fight the Communists; it's almost if they get pleasure out of seeing an American sacrifice himself as long as he wasn't born rich.
|
|
|
Post by greatestiam on May 20, 2019 11:29:55 GMT
thesageofmainstreet
The U.S. and American's are likely the most insecure country and people on the planet. Insecure animals, if you look at the animal world in total, are always the worse behaved.
Their having the worse jail stats of the free world gives us a large hint that they are the most insecure and least well behaved nation and people on earth.
To give Americans a bit of credit, they took on that insecurity by promoting themselves as the guardians of democracy and the rest of the free world elected to have it so.
I don't think Americans back then realized how they were going to screw their own people, over the long run, by having them be the most insecure on earth.
Regards DL
|
|
|
Post by thesageofmainstreet on May 20, 2019 20:08:46 GMT
thesageofmainstreet The U.S. and Americans are likely the most insecure country and people on the planet. Insecure animals, if you look at the animal world in total, are always the worse behaved. Their having the worse jail stats of the free world gives us a large hint that they are the most insecure and least well behaved nation and people on earth. To give Americans a bit of credit, they took on that insecurity by promoting themselves as the guardians of democracy and the rest of the free world elected to have it so. I don't think Americans back then realized how they were going to screw their own people, over the long run, by having them be the most insecure on earth. Regards DL There's Nothing Humanitarian About Defending Sub-HumansThe hereditary plutocracy hates and fears all other White people. Don't blame real Americans for the insecurity of the illegitimate economic, educational, media, and political elitists. They have no right to be in charge of anything; the only way they can survive is to distract, harass, and humiliate everyone else. The hereditary plutocracy encourages naturally criminal races to go wherever their jungle-instincts take them. Without that selective permissiveness, we would have a low incarceration rate. As for the Whigger trash, the Preppy Republic could solve the narcotics problem by poisoning the drug supply, but Wall Street makes too much money laundering drug money. Real Americans don't care about being a role model for foreign countries. Existing only in broadcasts, such virtue-signaling propaganda gets us in wars to save useless foreigners and kill off the bravest of the working class; the gutless elitists' own spoiled brats and no-talent flunkies who run away to college never have to risk their lives for the moralistic imperialism they pretend represents American opinion.
|
|
|
Post by greatestiam on May 21, 2019 15:12:15 GMT
Real Americans no longer exist.
Regards DL
|
|
|
Post by thesageofmainstreet on May 21, 2019 16:44:12 GMT
Real Americans no longer exist. Regards DL We Won't Live Free Until the 1% Live in Fear Our illegitimate hereditary ruling class certainly hopes that real Americans are a thing of the past. Otherwise, we would send the Preppy scumbags back to the crumbling castles of Europe where they belong. "Serfs Up!" would terrify them.
|
|
|
Post by greatestiam on May 21, 2019 19:56:23 GMT
Real Americans no longer exist. Regards DL We Won't Live Free Until the 1% Live in Fear Our illegitimate hereditary ruling class certainly hopes that real Americans are a thing of the past. Otherwise, we would send the Preppy scumbags back to the crumbling castles of Europe where they belong. "Serfs Up!" would terrify them. All we would be doing is exchanging one set of oligarchs for another.
Remember the French Revolution?
What is required is for Americans, if there are any, to put a fair tax law in place instead of what is presently in place.
No one in a free land should live in fear. All should live in fair.
Pardon my French.
Regards DL
|
|
|
Post by thesageofmainstreet on May 22, 2019 19:10:24 GMT
We Won't Live Free Until the 1% Live in Fear Our illegitimate hereditary ruling class certainly hopes that real Americans are a thing of the past. Otherwise, we would send the Preppy scumbags back to the crumbling castles of Europe where they belong. "Serfs Up!" would terrify them. All we would be doing is exchanging one set of oligarchs for another.
Remember the French Revolution?
What is required is for Americans, if there are any, to put a fair tax law in place instead of what is presently in place.
No one in a free land should live in fear. All should live in fair.
Regards DL
Twist Every Preppy's Smirking Lips Until They BleedDon't pay any attention to the HeirHeads' historians. Whether they pretend to be Left Wing or Right Wing, they're all scribbling elitist snobs. The French Revolution was the hereditary 2% using the 98% to kill off the 1%. The self-declared privilege of inheritance is the cancer that inevitably destroys all civilizations. It must be surgically removed. There's no way to live with that tumor, as the rulers want you to believe. The misleading "Power Corrupts; Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely" was written by someone who would have been an ignored nobody without his family's money, Lord Acton. Always consider the source; only then can you realize that it a deceptive way to discourage change and give us a slogan for submission to the status quo. Let's give the spoiled brats who call us "jealous whiners" something to whine about it when we force them to compete fairly. Hillary would be no more than a waitress, the Kennedys and Bushes would be bartenders. An inheritance tax of 100% would eliminate the need for any income taxes at all. Leftover wealth is unearned and must be confiscated. Why would you rather tax the living than tax the dead?
|
|
|
Post by greatestiam on Jun 1, 2019 19:55:35 GMT
All we would be doing is exchanging one set of oligarchs for another.
Remember the French Revolution?
What is required is for Americans, if there are any, to put a fair tax law in place instead of what is presently in place.
No one in a free land should live in fear. All should live in fair.
Regards DL
Twist Every Preppy's Smirking Lips Until They BleedDon't pay any attention to the HeirHeads' historians. Whether they pretend to be Left Wing or Right Wing, they're all scribbling elitist snobs. The French Revolution was the hereditary 2% using the 98% to kill off the 1%. The self-declared privilege of inheritance is the cancer that inevitably destroys all civilizations. It must be surgically removed. There's no way to live with that tumor, as the rulers want you to believe. The misleading "Power Corrupts; Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely" was written by someone who would have been an ignored nobody without his family's money, Lord Acton. Always consider the source; only then can you realize that it a deceptive way to discourage change and give us a slogan for submission to the status quo. Let's give the spoiled brats who call us "jealous whiners" something to whine about it when we force them to compete fairly. Hillary would be no more than a waitress, the Kennedys and Bushes would be bartenders. An inheritance tax of 100% would eliminate the need for any income taxes at all. Leftover wealth is unearned and must be confiscated. Why would you rather tax the living than tax the dead? Because the living make the laws and not the dead.
Do you believe in the Golden Rule?
Would you like your family wealth to just go to the state instead of your family and friends when you die?
If not, which is what most people will answer, what makes you think that living wills would not become the order of the day for the rich?
Your answers are why I prefer a decent tax system, including an inheritance tax.
Regards DL
|
|
|
Post by thesageofmainstreet on Jun 1, 2019 21:41:06 GMT
Twist Every Preppy's Smirking Lips Until They BleedDon't pay any attention to the HeirHeads' historians. Whether they pretend to be Left Wing or Right Wing, they're all scribbling elitist snobs. The French Revolution was the hereditary 2% using the 98% to kill off the 1%. The self-declared privilege of inheritance is the cancer that inevitably destroys all civilizations. It must be surgically removed. There's no way to live with that tumor, as the rulers want you to believe. The misleading "Power Corrupts; Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely" was written by someone who would have been an ignored nobody without his family's money, Lord Acton. Always consider the source; only then can you realize that it a deceptive way to discourage change and give us a slogan for submission to the status quo. Let's give the spoiled brats who call us "jealous whiners" something to whine about it when we force them to compete fairly. Hillary would be no more than a waitress, the Kennedys and Bushes would be bartenders. An inheritance tax of 100% would eliminate the need for any income taxes at all. Leftover wealth is unearned and must be confiscated. Why would you rather tax the living than tax the dead? Because the living make the laws and not the dead.
Do you believe in the Golden Rule?
Would you like your family wealth to just go to the state instead of your family and friends when you die?
If not, which is what most people will answer, what makes you think that living wills would not become the order of the day for the rich?
Your answers are why I prefer a decent tax system, including an inheritance tax.
Regards DL
If We Have to Do It on Our Own, So Must Richkids
Your combining things that don't fit together in order to get the conclusion required by those whose inherited wealth gives them the power to control minds and replace logic with obedience to their will. The first contradiction proves that they should be cut off at age 18 or cut down. They get in our way; your first sentence proves it is our way. So we, the living, must not led the dead pick winners and losers in our generation. We must not let hereditary power set up the dead's favorites halfway to the finish line.
The opposite of Statist is Selfist. It is dishonest to oppose the dead's rule by pretending that the State doesn't represent us, the living.
As for what I would like from a selfish perspective, that doesn't mean anything. I would like sex on demand from my employees as part of my plutocratic privileges ("which is what most people would answer"). What I would like others to do to me and to all the rest of us (which is what you slur as "the State") is the only honest question.
Living wills would be outlawed; that's more extortionist bluffing that we can easily make go away. Only a slavish coward would let HeirHead Affirmative Action sneak around in order to push us around.
Inheritance tax must be 100% or it will still cause the concentration of wealth that is fatal to the future of all of us. It is anti-social for anyone to use his money that way, which makes it criminal. So "it's his money" is more pushy nonsense. By the way, if it had a point, it would also mean that we can punish the HeirDad cheats with weapons bought "with our own money."
|
|