Clovis Merovingian
Prestige/VIP 
Elder
Posts: 2,689 
Likes: 1,757
Meta-Ethnicity: Anglo-American
Ethnicity: Deep Southerner
Country: My State and my Region are my country
Region: The Deep South
Location: South Carolina
Ancestry: Gaelic (patrilineal), English, Ulster Scots/Scots Irish, Scottish, German, Swiss German, Swedish, Manx, Finnish, Norman French/Quebecois (distantly), Dutch (distantly)
Taxonomy: Borreby/Alpine/ Nordid mix
Y-DNA: R-S660/R-DF109
mtDNA: T1a1
Politics: Conservative
Religion: Christian
Hero: Andrew Jackson, Thomas Jefferson, James K. Polk
Age: 30
Philosophy: I try to find out what is true as best I can.
|
Post by Clovis Merovingian on Apr 19, 2019 5:52:40 GMT
Mauritania is a country in which chattel slavery based upon race (Arab masters and black African slaves) still exists. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery_in_Mauritania The government denies that this is case and says that slavery is "totally finished ... all people are free", and that talk of it "suggests manipulation by the West, an act of enmity toward Islam, or influence from the worldwide Jewish conspiracy." However, Amnesty International estimates that 43,000 people still live in slavery in Mauritania. This site estimates that 90,000 were enslaved in 2018. www.globalslaveryindex.org/2018/data/country-data/mauritania/ |
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Apr 19, 2019 17:22:08 GMT
Here, here. If they're not whiteys they can't do slavery. Claiming that "you're improving master/slave system" is built upon rhetoric, cheating argument. The same is in Hegel's philosophy there and there.
We can say that the banks do slavery, but nobody will care, 'cause the banks are untouchables (in elite sense).
Whiteys don't fight for they own rights. And this should be the reason of all the violence that is going on against white people. In my school and many schools in my region we'd been told that non-white people were superior than us; that we had to be afraid of them, because they could strike us, etc.
Surely, it was nothing, but an act of provocation, and the real sinners were provocateurs, not that non-whites of which we'd been told.
The only path as seen by me as the most straight and fruitful is to teach our children to analyze, to determine, and to avoid any contacts of provocateurs.
In 2004-2005 in Ukraine there were holding elections of two candidates. One of them was a supporter of barely Russian culture in Ukraine, the other one was against it. The true was in that there were no real struggle between Russian and Ukrainian cultures; that confrontation was aimed as a political source, a thing for debates... So, I'd say politics may appear some kind of ruiners of any culture, trying to play on a folk's feelings. That's why I never uphold any such political view as something good.
History shows us a big role of using tastes for shaking men's pockets.
|
|
Clovis Merovingian
Prestige/VIP
Elder
Posts: 2,689
Likes: 1,757
Meta-Ethnicity: Anglo-American
Ethnicity: Deep Southerner
Country: My State and my Region are my country
Region: The Deep South
Location: South Carolina
Ancestry: Gaelic (patrilineal), English, Ulster Scots/Scots Irish, Scottish, German, Swiss German, Swedish, Manx, Finnish, Norman French/Quebecois (distantly), Dutch (distantly)
Taxonomy: Borreby/Alpine/ Nordid mix
Y-DNA: R-S660/R-DF109
mtDNA: T1a1
Politics: Conservative
Religion: Christian
Hero: Andrew Jackson, Thomas Jefferson, James K. Polk
Age: 30
Philosophy: I try to find out what is true as best I can.
|
Post by Clovis Merovingian on Apr 20, 2019 5:14:46 GMT
Here, here. If they're not whiteys they can't do slavery. Claiming that "you're improving master/slave system" is built upon rhetoric, cheating argument. The same is in Hegel's philosophy there and there. We can say that the banks do slavery, but nobody will care, 'cause the banks are untouchables (in elite sense). Whiteys don't fight for they own rights. And this should be the reason of all the violence that is going on against white people. In my school and many schools in my region we'd been told that non-white people were superior than us; that we had to be afraid of them, because they could strike us, etc. Surely, it was nothing, but an act of provocation, and the real sinners were provocateurs, not that non-whites of which we'd been told. The only path as seen by me as the most straight and fruitful is to teach our children to analyze, to determine, and to avoid any contacts of provocateurs. In 2004-2005 in Ukraine there were holding elections of two candidates. One of them was a supporter of barely Russian culture in Ukraine, the other one was against it. The true was in that there were no real struggle between Russian and Ukrainian cultures; that confrontation was aimed as a political source, a thing for debates... So, I'd say politics may appear some kind of ruiners of any culture, trying to play on a folk's feelings. That's why I never uphold any such political view as something good. History shows us a big role of using tastes for shaking men's pockets. What I don't understand is why nobody in the media seems to give a shite that there is literally a country where people own blacks. In the 50's through the 90s the media would never shut up about apartheid in South Africa but for some reason ignored something that was far worse in Mauritania and survives to this day. |
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Apr 20, 2019 5:38:21 GMT
Here, here. If they're not whiteys they can't do slavery. Claiming that "you're improving master/slave system" is built upon rhetoric, cheating argument. The same is in Hegel's philosophy there and there. We can say that the banks do slavery, but nobody will care, 'cause the banks are untouchables (in elite sense). Whiteys don't fight for they own rights. And this should be the reason of all the violence that is going on against white people. In my school and many schools in my region we'd been told that non-white people were superior than us; that we had to be afraid of them, because they could strike us, etc. Surely, it was nothing, but an act of provocation, and the real sinners were provocateurs, not that non-whites of which we'd been told. The only path as seen by me as the most straight and fruitful is to teach our children to analyze, to determine, and to avoid any contacts of provocateurs. In 2004-2005 in Ukraine there were holding elections of two candidates. One of them was a supporter of barely Russian culture in Ukraine, the other one was against it. The true was in that there were no real struggle between Russian and Ukrainian cultures; that confrontation was aimed as a political source, a thing for debates... So, I'd say politics may appear some kind of ruiners of any culture, trying to play on a folk's feelings. That's why I never uphold any such political view as something good. History shows us a big role of using tastes for shaking men's pockets. What I don't understand is why nobody in the media seems to give a shite that there is literally a country where people own blacks. In the 50's through the 90s the media would never shut up about apartheid in South Africa but for some reason ignored something that was far worse in Mauritania and survives to this day. It really doesn't matter what's going up in Africa. In 90's it was one sickness, but many countries there were in scruit and terrible conditions almost always. The plan of opening a new page of history for the new oppression against white is that what they did. You said truly that it was media hysteria. What a fool believes media?.. Media has become a function of legitimization of an action. If media shew something, judges or 'intellectuals' would talk just like it was the ultimate truth. Aparteid or another shit - is just one of trillion seasickness of our planet. We can throw (let 'em go) all our forces to stop it, or we can be more rational by giving a voice to people whose fathers has built the country and has written the constitution. Poorly, we don't have any our own countries now. Our voices are speechless, and our opinions are shitted. Struggle is the only key to obtain lands again. |
|
