|
Post by greatestiam on Mar 22, 2019 19:57:05 GMT
If governments controlled disposable income of the .1 %, would poverty end? The rich presently control our security of the person in our socio economic demographic position. They control the constitution and our social contracts. Security of the person is everyone’s number one goal in life, and the rich control ours. I think I would rather have my security of my person be in the hands of my government, than be in the hands of some rich person. They are strange and have forgotten their duty to those who are beneath them, demographically speaking. I believe it to be a crime for a rich country to impose poverty onto its citizens. Gandhi ji and others voiced the same notion. Our rich owners are abusing their power and I think that using a small % of their disposable income would solve many problems, --- that they have created, --- by poisoning our collective environments. Thoughts? Regards DL imgur.com/DiDyO2e
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Apr 7, 2019 16:08:33 GMT
@gratestiam
- No need to believe. It is. Poverty is, probably, the best way to control anyone. If you a have a thing that is needed urgently for a one, then you're controlling him.
There's good to take out 'control' over people. Anything that let us controlled themselves, not by anyone else is good. The same principle, as for me, is the same definition as freedom.
|
|
|
Post by greatestiam on Apr 10, 2019 12:36:48 GMT
@gratestiam - No need to believe. It is. Poverty is, probably, the best way to control anyone. If you a have a thing that is needed urgently for a one, then you're controlling him. There's good to take out 'control' over people. Anything that let us controlled themselves, not by anyone else is good. The same principle, as for me, is the same definition as freedom. The right answer on poverty. Thanks. As to freedom. We all gave that foolish notion up the moment we decided to put security over freedom by creating and following laws.
We do not trust free people to do the right things and freedom, as Socrates said is not really possible for us. He said it with a question. Who will make your shoes. IOW, we all need each other and cannot be free from each other.
Regards DL
Regards DL
|
|
PISTON1246
Full Member
Posts: 361
Likes: 90
Ethnicity: I HAVE ANCESTORS OF DIFFERENT SKIN COLOR AND EYE COLOR AND I MET SOME OF THEM WHILE THEY WERE STILL LIVING
Politics: REGISTERED VOTER
Religion: ISLAM
|
Post by PISTON1246 on Apr 12, 2019 20:08:51 GMT
ANAXAGORAS THE QURAN IS THE GOVERNING BOOK IN ISLAM AND IT SPEAKS OF THE TORAH BEING GIVEN THROUGH MOSES PEACE BE UPON HIM. I DO NOT HAVE MY FIRST QURAN TO GIVE YOU THE QUOTE WHERE IT SAID MUSLIMS ARE TO OBEY THE TORAH BUT I GIVE YOU MY WORD I DID READ THAT THERE BEFORE. I REGRET GIVING THAT QURAN TO SOMEONE'S LIBRARY BECAUSE I WANT TO READ IT AGAIN.
SURAH 6 VERSE 159 SAYS NOT TO FORM A SECT OR DIVISION IN THE RELIGION AND I HAVE HEARD SOMEONE WHO SAYS THEY ARE SUNNI WHICH IS A SECT SAY THEY GO BY THE SUNNAH.
ARE YOU MUSLIM? DO YOU READ THE QURAN?
BEING IN A SECT SUCH AS SUNNI OR SHIITE FOR EXAMPLE MEANS YOU DISOBEY THE QURAN TO SOME EXTENT.
|
|
|
Post by jonbain on Apr 17, 2019 21:21:34 GMT
If governments controlled disposable income of the .1 %, would poverty end? The rich presently control our security of the person in our socio economic demographic position. They control the constitution and our social contracts. Security of the person is everyone’s number one goal in life, and the rich control ours. I think I would rather have my security of my person be in the hands of my government, than be in the hands of some rich person. They are strange and have forgotten their duty to those who are beneath them, demographically speaking. I believe it to be a crime for a rich country to impose poverty onto its citizens. Gandhi ji and others voiced the same notion. Our rich owners are abusing their power and I think that using a small % of their disposable income would solve many problems, --- that they have created, --- by poisoning our collective environments. Thoughts? Regards DL imgur.com/DiDyO2eGovts are just the puppets of the rich. Poverty is primarily caused by over-population, though that might depend on how you define poverty. The problem with the rich is that they think that inheriting money makes them smart. The French and Russian aristocracies learnt the hard way that it actually just makes them a target for the frustrated multitudes. Most political thinking attempts to solve human problems on the grand scale, and it just contrives to mostly do nothing at all except shift the goalposts, rearrange the deckchairs, and give the illusion of purpose. Individualism and promoting dialog of a logical nature between individuals makes tiny but meaningful steps to improving the human condition.
|
|
|
Post by greatestiam on Apr 23, 2019 22:33:55 GMT
ANAXAGORAS THE QURAN IS THE GOVERNING BOOK IN ISLAM AND IT SPEAKS OF THE TORAH BEING GIVEN THROUGH MOSES PEACE BE UPON HIM. I DO NOT HAVE MY FIRST QURAN TO GIVE YOU THE QUOTE WHERE IT SAID MUSLIMS ARE TO OBEY THE TORAH BUT I GIVE YOU MY WORD I DID READ THAT THERE BEFORE. I REGRET GIVING THAT QURAN TO SOMEONE'S LIBRARY BECAUSE I WANT TO READ IT AGAIN. SURAH 6 VERSE 159 SAYS NOT TO FORM A SECT OR DIVISION IN THE RELIGION AND I HAVE HEARD SOMEONE WHO SAYS THEY ARE SUNNI WHICH IS A SECT SAY THEY GO BY THE SUNNAH. ARE YOU MUSLIM? DO YOU READ THE QURAN? BEING IN A SECT SUCH AS SUNNI OR SHIITE FOR EXAMPLE MEANS YOU DISOBEY THE QURAN TO SOME EXTENT.
I am a Gnostic Christian and hold no supernatural belief and do not respect those who have gone into intellectual and especially moral dissonance by worshiping vile and immoral gods like Yahweh and Allah and their homophobic and misogynous religions.
Have you examined the morals those religions preach and do you think they are moral?
Regards DL
|
|
PISTON1246
Full Member
Posts: 361
Likes: 90
Ethnicity: I HAVE ANCESTORS OF DIFFERENT SKIN COLOR AND EYE COLOR AND I MET SOME OF THEM WHILE THEY WERE STILL LIVING
Politics: REGISTERED VOTER
Religion: ISLAM
|
Post by PISTON1246 on Apr 26, 2019 16:22:05 GMT
ANAXAGORAS THE QURAN IS THE GOVERNING BOOK IN ISLAM AND IT SPEAKS OF THE TORAH BEING GIVEN THROUGH MOSES PEACE BE UPON HIM. I DO NOT HAVE MY FIRST QURAN TO GIVE YOU THE QUOTE WHERE IT SAID MUSLIMS ARE TO OBEY THE TORAH BUT I GIVE YOU MY WORD I DID READ THAT THERE BEFORE. I REGRET GIVING THAT QURAN TO SOMEONE'S LIBRARY BECAUSE I WANT TO READ IT AGAIN. SURAH 6 VERSE 159 SAYS NOT TO FORM A SECT OR DIVISION IN THE RELIGION AND I HAVE HEARD SOMEONE WHO SAYS THEY ARE SUNNI WHICH IS A SECT SAY THEY GO BY THE SUNNAH. ARE YOU MUSLIM? DO YOU READ THE QURAN? BEING IN A SECT SUCH AS SUNNI OR SHIITE FOR EXAMPLE MEANS YOU DISOBEY THE QURAN TO SOME EXTENT.
I am a Gnostic Christian and hold no supernatural belief and do not respect those who have gone into intellectual and especially moral dissonance by worshiping vile and immoral gods like Yahweh and Allah and their homophobic and misogynous religions.
Have you examined the morals those religions preach and do you think they are moral?
Regards DL
I READ THE BOOKS. THE TORAH AND QURAN AND THINK THEY ARE VERY MORAL. GOD DECIDES WHAT IS MORAL AND RIGHT. THERE IS ONLY ONE GOD. GOD OR ALLAH OR DIOS IS DIFFERENT WORDS IN DIFFERENT LANGUAGES THAT MEAN THE SAME THING TO ME. I HAVE NOT MET A HOMOSEXUAL WITH GOOD MORALS. HOMOSEXUALITY IN ITSELF IS IMMORALITY.
|
|
|
Post by greatestiam on Apr 26, 2019 18:20:42 GMT
I am a Gnostic Christian and hold no supernatural belief and do not respect those who have gone into intellectual and especially moral dissonance by worshiping vile and immoral gods like Yahweh and Allah and their homophobic and misogynous religions.
Have you examined the morals those religions preach and do you think they are moral?
Regards DL
I READ THE BOOKS. THE TORAH AND QURAN AND THINK THEY ARE VERY MORAL. GOD DECIDES WHAT IS MORAL AND RIGHT. THERE IS ONLY ONE GOD. GOD OR ALLAH OR DIOS IS DIFFERENT WORDS IN DIFFERENT LANGUAGES THAT MEAN THE SAME THING TO ME. I HAVE NOT MET A HOMOSEXUAL WITH GOOD MORALS. HOMOSEXUALITY IN ITSELF IS IMMORALITY.
Then tell us why your factitious god created them.
Try normal writing instead of screaming. It is good manners.
Regards DL
|
|
|
Post by thesageofmainstreet on Apr 30, 2019 16:44:32 GMT
If governments controlled disposable income of the .1 %, would poverty end? The rich presently control our security of the person in our socio economic demographic position. They control the constitution and our social contracts. Security of the person is everyone’s number one goal in life, and the rich control ours. I think I would rather have my security of my person be in the hands of my government, than be in the hands of some rich person. They are strange and have forgotten their duty to those who are beneath them, demographically speaking. I believe it to be a crime for a rich country to impose poverty onto its citizens. Gandhi ji and others voiced the same notion. Our rich owners are abusing their power and I think that using a small % of their disposable income would solve many problems, --- that they have created, --- by poisoning our collective environments. Thoughts? Regards DL imgur.com/DiDyO2e------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- We Have the Best Ideologies Daddy's Money Can BuyIt shouldn't be given to the lazy, stupid, worthless, and violent poor, either. Preppy Progressives are unconscious agents of the Right Wing they were born in. They intentionally make wealth distribution a giveaway to different parasites in order to trick the excluded majority into opposing it.
|
|