|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Mar 5, 2019 22:35:27 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Mar 7, 2019 19:52:09 GMT
Vortex Math causes vertigo
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Mar 7, 2019 19:57:30 GMT
Vortex Math causes vertigo Vertigo happens only when one is going "up".
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Mar 7, 2019 20:02:38 GMT
Vortex Math causes vertigo Vertigo happens only when one is going "up". Up => to heavens? or Down => to hell?
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Mar 8, 2019 20:25:02 GMT
Vertigo happens only when one is going "up". Up => to heavens? or Down => to hell? Elaborate.
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Mar 8, 2019 21:09:33 GMT
Actually, vortex Math is awesome. The subject is too similar to clocktable (I mean not digital form of may watches; wristwatches in 50-90s).
|
|
ckyap
New Member
Posts: 42
Likes: 12
Country: Malaysia
Ancestry: Asian Jewish
Politics: Monarchist
Religion: Tao Buddheo-Christian
Relationship Status: single
Age: 42
|
Post by ckyap on Mar 9, 2019 2:30:17 GMT
don't know exactly what it's for but could be used to sculpt roofs and other structures, otherwise it's just plain cool. thx. can you do this in 3d?
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Mar 9, 2019 4:10:32 GMT
don't know exactly what it's for but could be used to sculpt roofs and other structures, otherwise it's just plain cool. thx. can you do this in 3d? Numbers exists as dynamic entities, hence are qualities. All acts of quantification result in an inherent quality to go with it. For example all duality observes a polarity where an inherent active tension exists between forces (ex: man and woman go back and forth in a power play called "romance".) A triad observes a medial state which balances out the dualism by a common bond. (Ex: introduce child and the relationship is mediated further...either the man and woman join further thought the child or diverge because of it)
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Mar 9, 2019 4:11:52 GMT
Actually, vortex Math is awesome. The subject is too similar to clocktable (I mean not digital form of may watches; wristwatches in 50-90s). It is interesting because it just justifies what I have been arguing that numbers are directional qualities and as such geometry is inherently intertwined.
|
|
ckyap
New Member
Posts: 42
Likes: 12
Country: Malaysia
Ancestry: Asian Jewish
Politics: Monarchist
Religion: Tao Buddheo-Christian
Relationship Status: single
Age: 42
|
Post by ckyap on Mar 9, 2019 4:52:40 GMT
I notice this effect with music, not all music sounds the same transposed up or down but must hit that exact tone to sound like summer or spring, its creepy how numbers or values of things influence our subconscious. in malaysia we believe in numbers which sound auspicious and on numerically significant days. my sister was married on 6 friday june 2006, yeah I'm a firm believer in the power of quantities especially when multiplied or powered.
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Mar 9, 2019 8:15:30 GMT
Actually, vortex Math is awesome. The subject is too similar to clocktable (I mean not digital form of may watches; wristwatches in 50-90s). It is interesting because it just justifies what I have been arguing that numbers are directional qualities and as such geometry is inherently intertwined. That's correct. I thought about it too - that it is similar to your thought in some way. But, grounding on not wide info about your works (poorly, I'm still not involved myself to the process of understanding), I think that your views sympathize to not circle only (in planimetry vortex math), but more vary - on... hmm... dimensions, starting from stereometry and going further. Also, is there any link between your philosophy and postmodern philosophy (I mean using slang, using their methods like Derrida's "deconstruction" or any other ones)?
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Mar 9, 2019 16:38:59 GMT
It is interesting because it just justifies what I have been arguing that numbers are directional qualities and as such geometry is inherently intertwined. That's correct. I thought about it too - that it is similar to your thought in some way. But, grounding on not wide info about your works (poorly, I'm still not involved myself to the process of understanding), I think that your views sympathize to not circle only (in planimetry vortex math), but more vary - on... hmm... dimensions, starting from stereometry and going further. Also, is there any link between your philosophy and postmodern philosophy (I mean using slang, using their methods like Derrida's "deconstruction" or any other ones)? Look at the Egypt-Philosophy thread.
Philosophy fundamentally comes down to a question over the nature of measurement (hence quantitative and qualitative values at the practical ethical level) and as such what I argue strictly addresses either directly or by proxy the nature of postmodern philosophy as strictly a value system premised on the continual progression of "language" which effectively "mirrors" the progressive nature of facts in science.
In trying to "fit in" with the public materialistic mindset philosophy mimiced the nature of the "wheel of science" which continually dissolves facts into further "facts" with any prior "facts" effectively being negated by the new ones. Hence most scientific facts are strictly just spontaneously localization of certain relations we use to guide how we percieve the world; hence ourselves.
The problem occurs that this "progression" causes a continual divergence within the group and individual perspectives, evidenced in not just the identity crisis of the modern person but group incoherence and the generation gap.
The difference is that they applied this to "language"...hence the mass confusion.
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Mar 11, 2019 18:12:22 GMT
That's correct. I thought about it too - that it is similar to your thought in some way. But, grounding on not wide info about your works (poorly, I'm still not involved myself to the process of understanding), I think that your views sympathize to not circle only (in planimetry vortex math), but more vary - on... hmm... dimensions, starting from stereometry and going further. Also, is there any link between your philosophy and postmodern philosophy (I mean using slang, using their methods like Derrida's "deconstruction" or any other ones)? Look at the Egypt-Philosophy thread.
Philosophy fundamentally comes down to a question over the nature of measurement (hence quantitative and qualitative values at the practical ethical level) and as such what I argue strictly addresses either directly or by proxy the nature of postmodern philosophy as strictly a value system premised on the continual progression of "language" which effectively "mirrors" the progressive nature of facts in science.
In trying to "fit in" with the public materialistic mindset philosophy mimiced the nature of the "wheel of science" which continually dissolves facts into further "facts" with any prior "facts" effectively being negated by the new ones. Hence most scientific facts are strictly just spontaneously localization of certain relations we use to guide how we percieve the world; hence ourselves.
The problem occurs that this "progression" causes a continual divergence within the group and individual perspectives, evidenced in not just the identity crisis of the modern person but group incoherence and the generation gap.
The difference is that they applied this to "language"...hence the mass confusion.
I must say you're thinking incredible! Speaking with you is the same as to speak with a great philosopher (I swear). And there's something interesting in your words from Kabbalah side. There are the similar talks about egoism self-eating (=perceiving the world & ourselves), and about lack of language another forms of expressing; or feeling of a lack of it. Mass confusion - is something, I'd say, that perfectly described what we have today.
|
|