|
|
Post by DKTrav88 on Oct 13, 2018 4:02:27 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Elizabeth on Oct 13, 2018 23:01:19 GMT
Wow I like the article. However, I don't need proof personally to know that the people from scripture existed. Shrug
|
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 23, 2018 12:01:53 GMT
It doesn't. It proves that certain events took place, and that certain people existed. Which is something that people generally don't argue about.
Which human species were Adam and Eve? Try to answer this question and you'll see that archaeology doesn't suggest in any place that the Bible is reliable source. Besides, how does the existence of Jesus prove that God exists?
|
|
|
|
Post by DKTrav88 on Oct 23, 2018 17:18:17 GMT
It doesn't. It proves that certain events took place, and that certain people existed. Which is something that people generally don't argue about. Which human species were Adam and Eve? Try to answer this question and you'll see that archaeology doesn't suggest in any place that the Bible is reliable source. Besides, how does the existence of Jesus prove that God exists? I try to ignore stupid questions shrug |
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 24, 2018 15:24:37 GMT
It doesn't. It proves that certain events took place, and that certain people existed. Which is something that people generally don't argue about. Which human species were Adam and Eve? Try to answer this question and you'll see that archaeology doesn't suggest in any place that the Bible is reliable source. Besides, how does the existence of Jesus prove that God exists? I try to ignore stupid questions  I, on the other hand, try to avoid commenting stupid ideas, but I fail miserably. |
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 26, 2018 19:43:52 GMT
Which part of my post(s) are you referring too? I hope it's not a stupid question this time. Atheism is stupid in general I see the lamp of your intelect doesn't cast much light, so I'll end here, eating apple and drinking cola. |
|
|
|
Post by DKTrav88 on Oct 26, 2018 19:48:57 GMT
Atheism is stupid in general I see the lamp of your intelect doesn't cast much light, so I'll end here, eating apple and drinking cola. It is the sport of a fool to do mischief. If you are not willing to change your mind, then there was never a need for us to have a discussion. |
|
|
|
Post by Elizabeth on Oct 27, 2018 3:32:12 GMT
It doesn't. It proves that certain events took place, and that certain people existed. Which is something that people generally don't argue about. Which human species were Adam and Eve? Try to answer this question and you'll see that archaeology doesn't suggest in any place that the Bible is reliable source. Besides, how does the existence of Jesus prove that God exists? Anyway, you'd be surprised how many people don't believe that certain people existed and then would argue over it. You as far as I know, you believe Jesus existed while being atheist, while another atheist I know would argue nonstop with me that He never existed. I'd personally leave such things at an agree to disagree kind of thing but even little things can be hard to convince people with I think Shrug |
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 27, 2018 9:05:41 GMT
It doesn't. It proves that certain events took place, and that certain people existed. Which is something that people generally don't argue about. Which human species were Adam and Eve? Try to answer this question and you'll see that archaeology doesn't suggest in any place that the Bible is reliable source. Besides, how does the existence of Jesus prove that God exists? (I'm attempting to bring this thread back to topic since Diamond is going of into other threads and into Protestantism which no one cares about.) Anyway, you'd be surprised how many people don't believe that certain people existed and then would argue over it. You as far as I know, you believe Jesus existed while being atheist, while another atheist I know would argue nonstop with me that He never existed. I'd personally leave such things at an agree to disagree kind of thing but even little things can be hard to convince people with I think Shrug It still doesn't say anything about Bible being reliable. |
|
|
|
Post by Elizabeth on Oct 27, 2018 16:05:05 GMT
(I'm attempting to bring this thread back to topic since Diamond is going of into other threads and into Protestantism which no one cares about.) Anyway, you'd be surprised how many people don't believe that certain people existed and then would argue over it. You as far as I know, you believe Jesus existed while being atheist, while another atheist I know would argue nonstop with me that He never existed. I'd personally leave such things at an agree to disagree kind of thing but even little things can be hard to convince people with I think Shrug It still doesn't say anything about Bible being reliable. I wasn't talking about that but ok let's see what the article says. I see it says that the bible is a credible history source. "Reading such assertions made me curious to find out how many other recent archaeological discoveries lend credibility to the historical veracity of the Bible" |
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 27, 2018 20:23:50 GMT
It still doesn't say anything about Bible being reliable. I wasn't talking about that but ok let's see what the article says. I see it says that the bible is a credible history source. "Reading such assertions made me curious to find out how many other recent archaeological discoveries lend credibility to the historical veracity of the Bible" And I say it's not, because.... ...read my questions from my first post here. |
|
|
|
Post by Elizabeth on Oct 29, 2018 19:01:26 GMT
So as we already know, archaeologists are just people who prove what happened in history as true by the things they find. The thing that concerns me is that nonreligious people sometimes disregard their work. I remember studying in history about people of the past and any religions they had. Jesus was mentioned in this history. Yet some still don't believe He existed even though He's part of history. Just odd...
|
|
|
|
Post by Διαμονδ on Oct 29, 2018 19:49:55 GMT
So as we already know, archaeologists are just people who prove what happened in history as true by the things they find. The thing that concerns me is that nonreligious people sometimes disregard their work. I remember studying in history about people of the past and any religions they had. Jesus was mentioned in this history. Yet some still don't believe He existed even though He's part of history. Just odd... @romeo the archaeologist. If I'm not mistaken  |
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 1, 2018 8:46:40 GMT
Διαμονδ , will be one day I hope.  Interestingly, I don't see much of the "religious spirit" among the professors. But I won't continue this discussion, I already stated what I wanted to say. No need for me to participate in a bidding who has more to say.
|
|
|
|
Post by Διαμονδ on Nov 1, 2018 22:25:40 GMT
My comments on this topic moved to another topic. arktos.boards.net/thread/3635/randomIf the opinion of an atheist for religious people does not mean anything then uncomfortable religious facts for them is either a subject for criticism or an undesirable element for their eyes. I'm just doing an exchange of opinions for scientifically progressive purposes. Shrug My subjective opinion. |
|
