|
|
Post by Elizabeth on Oct 7, 2018 19:42:31 GMT
I don't understand. Whites could be pure evil and some shouldn't even exist like Hitler and Stalin. So how are whites elite or considered to be? People are just people. ...black, white, brown, and blue with Mohawks. Shrug
|
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Aug 15, 2019 11:24:48 GMT
But if some points arose far from the center, why should they be diminished, or lower? There should be no difference between a center and its periphery, I guess. The periphery constitutes a center, and vice versa. (In a foundation of the balance.) However, a balance doesn't always mean something good. The balance has its own weak points. By what fundamentalists (in the sociology) wanted we could achieve something like this:   Each point of reality is a context, each context is a point. If I use the above example of the picture. Sensory reality is one context, virtual reality is another context. Each context is a point of reality which fundamentally diverges from eachother. Virtual comes from the empirical and in turn we model the empirical from the virtual. The variation of contexts, one virtual and one empirical, results in extremes thus leading to a form of cognitive dissonance (tearing of psyche) and contradiction. The division of empirical reality into a virtual reality observes a split in the point of awareness, where reality as composed of physical and abstract phenomenon effectively is divided further. The standard contemplative nature of reality is fundamentally projected into an empirical form which is not fully empirical but in a dimension of awareness that exists along side it. This splitting causes an imbalance. Another example, can be observing the nature of physical exercise. Is it primarily for aesthetics (body building) or a practical endeavor (martial art/labor)? The splitting of the two causes an imbalance where a man may appear as fit but have no practical skill. Think of a fit person who has no skill in anything. Or a man may have a practical skill but no real aesthetics (implying good health). Think of a carpenter who has skills with his hands but is overweight, or the martial arts instructor which cannot lift a small weight without tiring. The problem, in the modern world is a seperation between these two contexts, which exist as points of awareness considering both body building/fitness and martial arts/labors are actually ways of observing the world which form our lives. The seperating of these points of awareness causes an imbalance, and can be rectified through finding a balance or synthesing the opposites back to a center point between the two. The carpenter must loose weight, to increase endurance, to gain physical skill and the martial artist must become stronger and not rely strictly on "skill". Simultaneously the fit person or "body builder" must learn some skill to apply his/her strength too, such as carpentry or martial arts. Problems occur because of an imbalance, this imbalance is a seperation of contexts. "Each point of reality is a context, each context is a point. If I use the above example of the picture. Sensory reality is one context, virtual reality is another context. Each context is a point of reality which fundamentally diverges from eachother. Virtual comes from the empirical and in turn we model the empirical from the virtual. The variation of contexts, one virtual and one empirical, results in extremes thus leading to a form of cognitive dissonance (tearing of psyche) and contradiction". - I should notice here: by this picture I didn't want to demonstrate contradictions between "vitrual" and "empirical" realities/contexts. No, just anime fans and the fans of... well... drinking lots, using drugs culture don't fit to each other. They are from parallel dimensions.But yes, I do agree what you say. Actually, I liked movies like "Who Framed Roger Rabbit" with a famous Jessica Rabbit in it. I think she looked sexy while it was too obvious too confuse here. The same I guess have a too huge place now in a porn addiction aspect: in addiction to hentai.The division of empirical reality into a virtual reality observes a split in the point of awareness, where reality as composed of physical and abstract phenomenon effectively is divided further. The standard contemplative nature of reality is fundamentally projected into an empirical form which is not fully empirical but in a dimension of awareness that exists along side it. This splitting causes an imbalance. - But, however, the same processes are working in our veins and nerves. The nerves that connected and directed to brain act like AC, I mean, an alternating current. Imbalance is a good way to start something to move, or, I should say, to wake something up to do something. Maybe a mechanical reason was a pusher of our life; it happened just by an accident, and a life appear to exist.Another example, can be observing the nature of physical exercise. Is it primarily for aesthetics (body building) or a practical endeavor (martial art/labor)? The splitting of the two causes an imbalance where a man may appear as fit but have no practical skill. Think of a fit person who has no skill in anything. Or a man may have a practical skill but no real aesthetics (implying good health). Think of a carpenter who has skills with his hands but is overweight, or the martial arts instructor which cannot lift a small weight without tiring. Hmm... a bright example. We need to pimp our muscles. What about the brain muscles of ours?The problem, in the modern world is a seperation between these two contexts, which exist as points of awareness considering both body building/fitness and martial arts/labors are actually ways of observing the world which form our lives. The seperating of these points of awareness causes an imbalance, and can be rectified through finding a balance or synthesing the opposites back to a center point between the two. The carpenter must loose weight, to increase endurance, to gain physical skill and the martial artist must become stronger and not rely strictly on "skill". Simultaneously the fit person or "body builder" must learn some skill to apply his/her strength too, such as carpentry or martial arts. Problems occur because of an imbalance, this imbalance is a seperation of contexts.Anyway, it's obvious that you try to explain it in a dialectical way. I have no objection here for using this method, but why dialectic? Why an analysis and a synthesis here is what must be this way? - Imbalance is an absent of a balance in some scales. There's no "imbalance" without some interpretation. Each time we're using an interpretation, we do a separation act of a context, don't we? |
|
