DEAR BLM ACTIVISTS

Black Lives Matter = BLM.. I think

There's something interesting about speech acts as they are discussed in 'linguistic philosophy'. Some of phrases can be taken by someone as sorta action. For example, if I had come to the forum and loudly type 'I LOVE ELIZABETH!', and some of participants would have guessed my message as a reveal of my love to Elizabeth. But what is never done to this phrase - it can be accepted as both truth and false. So, such phrases can't help us if the case if we start to consider them as phrase with a 'special message'.

The secret of such phrases is in two spare adds to the phrases. Firstly, we start considering something behind it, secondly, considering something behind it means that something is linked with what are considering about. If A is a speech act, this means that someone (probably, the one who does all this routine) add ->B, so we get A->B, and B means that 'there's something inside an 'A' that causes B.

(A^x)->B

The statement x->B is usually dropped. But this statement is the main one. If A, and x->B, and A is truth, and x->B is supposed to be truth by the routine maker, than ... then nothing. There's no conclusion from A and x->B to something. That's why this mind-discussion is false.

So, you all can ask me: for why I wrote it? I'll explain - the very first statement in the start of the post is very close to the speech act phrase. We can't say whether it is a speech act or no in every case, but some of are able to be them. We can notice such claims in political or social life very often.