|
Post by Elizabeth on Jun 18, 2018 2:30:52 GMT
Dear atheists, is this a statement you agree with or what thoughts do you have on this? In my opinion it's false. A prophet is someone who claims to see the future and often I hear atheists claim to me that my beliefs will come to nothing. It's a prophesy that was made in the end.
|
|
|
Post by DKTrav88 on Jun 18, 2018 3:40:47 GMT
Yep, they are trying to predict the future just as much. Saying what you believe won't come to fruition is a declaration that they know the future
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 18, 2018 12:59:45 GMT
Atheism is about not believing in any gods. Period. No further explanation is needed, because it ends exactly after my first sentence here.
Besides, originally the prophets were people who talked on someone's behalf, especially in Ancient Greece as far as I know. And not necessarily on behalf of any gods, but on behalf of other people who were higher in the hierarchy but the prophets were more charismatic.
Atheism is not an organisation neither.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 18, 2018 20:24:27 GMT
Atheism is needed as much as religion.
Look up, if there were no atheists, there would be zero religion persons. Religion is the cultural phenomenon, a step in the history.
If there's none unreligious people, then everyone believe in God, but it doesn't mean that everyone goes to Heaven. So, the ones who didn't believe in God (they were sinners, and their sins are the sign of their non-believing in God), were atheists. Therefore, there were atheists in past. Before any religion there were just atheists. Even an infant before being baptized (or an adult) is an atheist. Hence, in the era of unreligious people there were atheists, that is a contradiction. That's why atheism exists before any religion, and it means - there were no atheism too, because there were no religion before it. So, God came and divided everyone to believers and non-believers. If you're a believer, there's at least one atheist. You must care about him, because if he becomes a believer, there will be no believers, and it makes everything goes wrong.
Atheists are prothets to their delusioned brothers. ZD
|
|
|
Post by fschmidt on Jun 18, 2018 21:20:35 GMT
A prophet is someone who claims to see the future and often I hear atheists claim to me that my beliefs will come to nothing. It's a prophesy that was made in the end. Actually a prophet is someone who claims to know some truth that can't be objectively verified. The founding prophet of Atheism was Plato who proclaimed the existence of universal absolute truth based on faith. This is the core faith of Atheism. Plato also described the future prophets of Atheism as the philosophers in "The Republic". Today all Atheists consider themselves to be prophets, able to see truth in their own mind without verification in reality. This thinking produced Leftism, the political branch of Atheism.
|
|
|
Post by Elizabeth on Jun 18, 2018 22:58:35 GMT
A prophet is someone who claims to see the future and often I hear atheists claim to me that my beliefs will come to nothing. It's a prophesy that was made in the end. Actually a prophet is someone who claims to know some truth that can't be objectively verified. The founding prophet of Atheism was Plato who proclaimed the existence of universal absolute truth based on faith. This is the core faith of Atheism. Plato also described the future prophets of Atheism as the philosophers in "The Republic". Today all Atheists consider themselves to be prophets, able to see truth in their own mind without verification in reality. This thinking produced Leftism, the political branch of Atheism. Well, someone who calls themselves a prophet is making prophesies about things to come. Whether or not they come to pass just will let us know the how truthful it was if it can be verified later. Or how skillful he is in what he claims
|
|
|
Post by fschmidt on Jun 18, 2018 23:49:33 GMT
Actually a prophet is someone who claims to know some truth that can't be objectively verified. Well, someone who calls themselves a prophet is making prophesies about things to come. Whether or not they come to pass just will let us know the how truthful it was if it can be verified later. Or how skillful he is in what he claims The Hebrew meaning of the word is spokesman. biblehub.com/hebrew/5030.htmThe accuracy of prediction is a test of whether the prophet is really inspired by God according to Deuteronomy 18:22. So the Atheist prophets are spokesmen for the religion of Atheism, but not for God because their predictions don't come true.
|
|
|
Post by Διαμονδ on Jun 19, 2018 10:25:16 GMT
Atheism is needed as much as religion. Look up, if there were no atheists, there would be zero religion persons. Religion is the cultural phenomenon, a step in the history. If there's none unreligious people, then everyone believe in God, but it doesn't mean that everyone goes to Heaven. So, the ones who didn't believe in God (they were sinners, and their sins are the sign of their non-believing in God), were atheists. Therefore, there were atheists in past. Before any religion there were just atheists. Even an infant before being baptized (or an adult) is an atheist. Hence, in the era of unreligious people there were atheists, that is a contradiction. That's why atheism exists before any religion, and it means - there were no atheism too, because there were no religion before it. So, God came and divided everyone to believers and non-believers. If you're a believer, there's at least one atheist. You must care about him, because if he becomes a believer, there will be no believers, and it makes everything goes wrong. Atheists are prothets to their delusioned brothers. ZD Atheism is belief in the absence of God!
|
|
|
Post by Elizabeth on Jun 20, 2018 7:47:44 GMT
Atheism is about not believing in any gods. Period. No further explanation is needed, because it ends exactly after my first sentence here. Besides, originally the prophets were people who talked on someone's behalf, especially in Ancient Greece as far as I know. And not necessarily on behalf of any gods, but on behalf of other people who were higher in the hierarchy but the prophets were more charismatic. Atheism is not an organisation neither. Atheists are a group of people as religious people are a group of people. Can't organization just mean a group though?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 20, 2018 8:11:07 GMT
Atheism is about not believing in any gods. Period. No further explanation is needed, because it ends exactly after my first sentence here. Besides, originally the prophets were people who talked on someone's behalf, especially in Ancient Greece as far as I know. And not necessarily on behalf of any gods, but on behalf of other people who were higher in the hierarchy but the prophets were more charismatic. Atheism is not an organisation neither. Atheists are a group of people as religious people are a group of people. Can't organization just mean a group though? Group and organization are not the same things.
|
|
|
Post by DKTrav88 on Jun 20, 2018 8:13:36 GMT
Atheists are a group of people as religious people are a group of people. Can't organization just mean a group though? Group and organization are not the same things. There are organized groups atheists that go out of their way to try to disprove the existence of God though
|
|